Here's the commander of KG Peiper, a German officer who's troops killed Americans that had surrendered, at Malmady.
Here's Nixon shaking hands and smiling at Mao (Nixon must have been a Communist), not Cho...
Still think that O'Reilly has any relevance?
[edit] Oh, look, someone doesn't like that I called Loufa-boy a moron. At least I did not mention Andrea Makris [end edit]
[add edit]
Bill O'Reilly takes on a Nobel Laureate, and is wrong (as usual)...
Bill-o lies about Shawn Hornbeck, saying he probably enjoyed being kidnapped and abused...
Chuck Scarborough (no liberal, he) discusses more lies of "Hostile Work Environment" O'Reilly...
I am going to have it done to myself to see what all the fuss is about.
Hearing someone belittle torture gives me a wish to see it tried on him.
Pom-Pom Pelosi was one of the first members of Congress ever briefed on the interrogation tactics.
She knew about it and she agreed to it. She lied, She lied, She lied.
Read it here:
http://voices.washingtonpost....
I read your Bush-Bashing, Pompous-Assed Post, below, which naturally lacked any substantiation to support the rhetoric you spewed...
...and to think, I was beginning to believe YOU, TOO! That is, unitl I read "Winghunter's" documented response to yours, which became graphically apparent that HE BUSTED YOUR NUTZ !!! LOL (no pun intened)
...and You talk about "Creditability" and "The Facts". Puleeez
Say what you mean, mean what you say... and if you can't back up what you say, then STFU!
There are so many on here like you, who go on-and-on about "this issue" and "that issue". You write thousands of words, without documentation, in an attempt to prove your position.
You simply 'Parrot' what you can vaguely reassemble from what you heard on one of those "Report" shows you watched, late at night, on the COMEDY CENTRAL Channel and You deem it as trustworthy information and REAL Journalism!
This is why the Conservatives, the Right, Traditionalist, or whatever you want to call them, DO NOT have any respect for you and do not listen to you. You can't prove what you hatefully SPEW!
When you are confronted to answer a simple, straight forward question, you can't give a simple, straight forwar...
I read your Bush-Bashing, Pompous-Assed Post, below, which naturally lacked any substantiation to support the rhetoric you spewed...
...and to think, I was beginning to believe YOU, TOO! That is, unitl I read "Winghunter's" documented response to yours, which became graphically apparent that HE BUSTED YOUR NUTZ !!! LOL (no pun intened)
...and You talk about "Creditability" and "The Facts". Puleeez
Say what you mean, mean what you say... and if you can't back up what you say, then STFU!
There are so many on here like you, who go on-and-on about "this issue" and "that issue". You write thousands of words, without documentation, in an attempt to prove your position.
You simply 'Parrot' what you can vaguely reassemble from what you heard on one of those "Report" shows you watched, late at night, on the COMEDY CENTRAL Channel and You deem it as trustworthy information and REAL Journalism!
This is why the Conservatives, the Right, Traditionalist, or whatever you want to call them, DO NOT have any respect for you and do not listen to you. You can't prove what you hatefully SPEW!
When you are confronted to answer a simple, straight forward question, you can't give a simple, straight forward ANSWER!
I have read Thousands of words on here, from the empty Pumpkinheads, like you. You all keep saying the same thing over and over and it still continues to look like this...
You would not know real journalism if it hit you on the head like a 47 story steel building in six seconds. Go cry to your mommy lil bozo.
You sound like a ticking time bomb about to blow, with your words of anger and hatred like "ass-wipe pompous asses" and "lying sack of pig feces". Does your Mama know you talk like that? I hope we don't hear about you going "Postal" on the 6:00 evening news...
Forget about the Red pill, take the one below...
now, v-dude... if you would have read my post just above where you did your 'oratorical cannonball', you would have read my comment:
"Does it really matter what O'Reilly's 'opinion' is ?"
yeah, v-d, that was from me... OU812? ( 6th post above )
v-d, this is not making you look very good to the ladies on here...
First off, Nancy P. Does it really matter what she was "briefed" since she couldn't very well hold a press conference and spill the beans.
What matters the most are the law breakers that not only condoned but apparently ordered this illegal behavior and they are trying to get out of it by pointing a finger at Nancy. While she is no ones hero, that does nothing to take away the blame from the real villains here with their pathetic attempt to somehow pass the buck.
The Washington Post is owned by some Korean crackpot named Moon who thinks he's the second coming of Christ. Why not go all the way and join the moonies selling flowers? You would be the perfect follower: dumb obiedient and eager to please. Good luck!
You are just a plethora of information! A cornucopia of knowledge!
You shouldn't be waisting your time on SH... you should be playing "WHO WANTS TO BE A MILLIONAIRE" where you could win some $$$$$$ for all of that Trivial Pursuit information.