Bill Murray says that we should be personally responsible, and part of that responsibility, is for each one should help another, without waiting for government. Is he right

by GINGERBREAD Posted 2012/02/10 16:59:12

Related Topics: Murray, Government

2 votes
Read all 25 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

	This is what the Tea Partiers have been saying. Government should get out of the way and let everyone take care of each other
	Just imagine? If the government would only get out of the way, we can take care of each other. Then we can tell the lazy people to go to work and stop depending on someone to feed you.
	This is how private charities worked before the government got in the charity business.
	No, the government knows better on how to help everyone.
	Undecided (Please leave a comment)

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	This is what the Tea Partiers have been saying. Government should get out of the way and let everyone take care of each other	1 vote	50%
	Just imagine? If the government would only get out of the way, we can take care of each other. Then we can tell the lazy people to go to work and stop depending on someone to feed you.	0 votes	0%
	This is how private charities worked before the government got in the charity business.	0 votes	0%
	No, the government knows better on how to help everyone.	0 votes	0%
	Undecided	1 vote	50%

Add a comment above

Striker 2012/02/10 18:17:26 (edited)

Undecided

+2
I'll help family and friends all I can. I would save someone from drowning if I could, but if he turns out to be a proponent of Force I'll throw him back in and walk away. No way will I help my enemies who don't respect our Right to Life. That includes this (or any) GOVERNment.

reply
GINGERB... to Striker 2012/02/10 19:51:26

+1
Any time you take government money, that gives them the right to tell you how to spend it. This is the biggest problem that nobody seems to understand. They think that it's okay to take government money, without the government wanting a quid-pro-quo.

reply
Striker to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 19:58:31

+1
all I take is my own SS money which Gov stole from us in the first place.

reply
GINGERB... to Striker 2012/02/10 21:36:28

+1
Forget it. There is no money in the SS. The government has already spent that a long time ago. There is no "LOCKED BOX"

reply
Striker to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 21:39:29

+1
You're right, and anyone with an ounce of sense ought to know that. It's gonna be tough when the deposits no longer arrive. It's my only income. And people wonder why I would want this government to disappear!

reply
GINGERB... to Striker 2012/02/10 21:43:35

+1
Yep, I foresee the whole PONZI SCHEME crashing down on all of us, in a not too distant future. Then who will these ^%$#$%ing politicians going to blame?

reply
Striker to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 21:48:39 (edited)

+1
With any luck at all, Gov will become history and their jobs will disappear along with them. Then they might be on unemployment but with nobody to pay them. Such is what they deserve. There are a few good ones, not nearly enough.

reply
GINGERB... to Striker 2012/02/10 21:50:17

+1
Yep, that I can agree with, but unfortunately, not enough.

reply
Striker to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 21:54:15

+1
Not even close. Most everyone is all excited about vote2012, but without replacing most of Congress, it will be meaningless. For 232 years now it's been mostly more-of-the-same, that can't continue much longer.

reply
MHBL to Striker 2012/02/10 21:56:12
Striker to MHBL 2012/02/10 21:58:06

How could I possibly disagree with that? !!!!!!!!!!!!

reply
MHBL to Striker 2012/02/10 21:59:53 (edited)
Striker to MHBL 2012/02/10 22:07:36

LOL, Force makes the world go round... and round... and round...
and it always turns left

reply
GINGERB... to MHBL 2012/02/10 22:08:32

+1
If it became a law that the politicians would have to use their own money, all of this would stop in a HONG KONG minute. Every politicians enjoys spending every body's money, but not theirs

reply
Striker to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 22:09:51

And guess who would have to pass that law! LOL

reply
GINGERB... to Striker 2012/02/10 22:13:46

+1
Hey, that's a very good idea. Let's pass a law that anytime the politician decide to spend our money, they have to give up 20% of their salary. It's called spreading the wealth, which most of them are for.

reply
Striker to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 22:33:41

Well here's the deal. THEY pass the laws, we only get to obey them! But yes indeed let's spread their wealth - show me the way!

reply
GINGERB... to Striker 2012/02/10 22:50:32

just an idea, Hey you think we can get these politicians to pass that law?

reply
Striker to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 23:12:30 (edited)

LOL, why would they pass any law which stalls their gravy train?

reply
GINGERB... to Striker 2012/02/11 02:03:30

+1
Hope springs eternal I guess

reply
MHBL to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 22:10:07
GINGERBREAD 2012/02/10 17:04:54

This is what the Tea Partiers have been saying. Government should get out of ...

+1
THAT has been the problem. The government is using our tax money to bribe the people into voting for them. I'm saying that the government has no business in "HELPING" anyone. business or individuals. Because, when they do this, they can pick and choose which ones they will help. In private charities, the people ministering the charity can judge whether an individual really needs help or is that individual is just in for the ride.

reply
MHBL to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 21:58:24
GINGERB... to MHBL 2012/02/10 22:04:16

+1
If any one out there believe that this government is out to "HELP" anyone needs to have someone pee in their ear and get a new set of brains. The reason this government, or any government is "HELPING" anyone, should realise that the only ones they help is themselves

reply
MHBL to GINGERB... 2012/02/10 22:05:15