The future for the obama and Holder is
BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA….. RE-ELECT AS PRESIDENT OR BE TRIED FOR TREASON?
Old Salt
2012/08/16 15:06:28
|
|
|||||
|
148 votes
|
|
74% | ||
|
32 votes
|
|
16% | ||
|
21 votes
|
|
10% | |||
“OPSEC”
OPERATIONAL SECURITY – HAS OUR PRESIDENT PUT AMERICAN MILITARY, OUR ALLIES AND
OUR FRIENDS AT RISK FOR HIS OWN PERSONAL GLORY?
OPSEC'S number
one rule... NEVER let the enemy know your intentions, your operations. Maintaining
OPSEC means the difference between a successful operation and failure. Not only
for any “specific mission,” but any and ALL that will follow in the future! When
OPSEC is violated, enemies gain the upper hand.
President
Barrack H. Obama did more than just violate OPSEC on the raid of OSAMA BIN
LADEN, he released information of a Pakistani doctor who was captured and now
is serving a 33 year prison sentence in the jails of Pakistan. By refusing to
wait for announcing OBL’s death, the President exposed it to other terrorist whose names
and information was captured on the computer files by the Seal Team 6 raid,
giving them time to “run and hide!”
Within days
of the President’s announcement of killing OBL, Hollywood was invited into the
White House so that they could receive a briefing on exactly how the raid took
place. What kind of sources we had, what kind of methods we used… Why, ALL for
the purpose of making a Hollywood movie to be shown in time for the President’s
re-election?
Before
commenting on this blog, watch the attached video produced by current and
former TOP military and Secret Service members.
Then….. WHAT SAY YOU, Soda Head
Member? Old Salt
Read More: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedd...
Top Opinion
-
Demonic Rat Hunter 2012/08/16 15:21:57AS COMMANDER AND CHIEF, WE NEED TO TRY HIM FOR TREASON!
I can certainly understand why Republicans would do this, that's obvious.
The president has every right to claim victory.
"Admiral Bill McRaven, commander of the raid, said: "At the end of the day, make no mistake about it, it was the president of the United States that shouldered the burden for this operation, that made the hard decisions, that was instrumental in the planning process, because I pitched every plan to him."
As for your comment about ''I can certainly understand why Republicans would''........
Many top Democrats including Diane Feinstein says the Leaks are coming from the White House.
I was a SSG under the 1st SOC (Ft. Bragg) and am unimpressed with the statements of the interviewees in this video.
It was incumbent upon the President to break the news immediately after the operation - as the news would have been broken, with an opportunistic spin by some other interested party otherwise. This would contribute to a greater breach in security and who knows what else.
The fact that the President took a fair amount of credit was palpable, in that Osama would not have gotten killed at all - if it had not been for the decision of the President. The Commander-in-Chief was privy and decisive on every aspect of the operation, and took a very serious and calculated risk. The decision to kill Osama Bin Laden was an easy decision - but the details of how to do it and the execution of the operation was not.
I know for a fact that some operators (soldiers) in this event were trained to hastily gather paperwork, computers, photos, etc. for the purposes of intelligence - and this was done. In fact, this information has been helpful in the taking down of several other key members of Al Qaeda and various Qutbist ideo...
I was a SSG under the 1st SOC (Ft. Bragg) and am unimpressed with the statements of the interviewees in this video.
It was incumbent upon the President to break the news immediately after the operation - as the news would have been broken, with an opportunistic spin by some other interested party otherwise. This would contribute to a greater breach in security and who knows what else.
The fact that the President took a fair amount of credit was palpable, in that Osama would not have gotten killed at all - if it had not been for the decision of the President. The Commander-in-Chief was privy and decisive on every aspect of the operation, and took a very serious and calculated risk. The decision to kill Osama Bin Laden was an easy decision - but the details of how to do it and the execution of the operation was not.
I know for a fact that some operators (soldiers) in this event were trained to hastily gather paperwork, computers, photos, etc. for the purposes of intelligence - and this was done. In fact, this information has been helpful in the taking down of several other key members of Al Qaeda and various Qutbist ideologues.
As far as the alleged 'leaks' from the White House - it's largely speculation - and all of the information put out regarding this operation was information that could be deduced anyway by anyone familiar with military SOP.
None of this was haphazardly handled. It is the responsible duty of the administration to present to the public tactical-yet-credible information that will purposefully manipulate whatever enemy may listen - to further actions that will cause their own capture. These CIA officers should already know this.
...and this is what happened - shortly after this raid - predictable events transpired that enabled this administration and military to advance this war on terror in OUR favor. In short, the enemy predictably further entrenched themselves into a trap.
These criticisms - on this video - are short-sighted and sophomoric and I can hardly believe that they are coming from any legitimate and experienced sources.
As far as a 'kill list' -
There has always been a kill list. There are enemies of liberty and justice who quite simply must die. There has been a kill list since Eisenhower and there are covert operations designed to address them.
This video underestimates the tactical benefit of psychological operations and falls prey to the very politics that it alleges to decry.
It is my opinion that Bush could have gotten bin Laden, but chose not to do it for political reasons - namely, for the expansion of Homeland Security and who knows what other deal he may have concocted. When intelligence came to us about Bin Laden - and his whereabouts, the reaction of the command was one of surprise when the mission was deep-sixed.
All in all, I cannot find fault in this Presidents' handling of this operation and his methodology with regards to it's dissemination to the public.
First off...the raid was cancelled 3 times as the powers behind him felt that if things did not go exactly right...it would be bad for his re-election. Miss Valerie makes his decisions.
Secondly...Now why would Obama say " NO...DON"T KILL HIM".
Oh yes...he must have been under such pressure to make such a decision ..poor guy. After all, he only murdered 3,000 innocent people.
Obama did not plan it. Where do you get your info? They had to teach him how to salute fallen soldiers and you think he helped plan a raid?????
AND YOU VOTE?
I was a SSG under the 1st SOC (Ft. Bragg) and am unimpressed with the statements of the interviewees in this video.
It was incumbent upon the President to break the news immediately after the operation - as the news would have been broken, with an opportunistic spin by some other interested party otherwise. This would contribute to a greater breach in security and who knows what else.
The fact that the President took a fair amount of credit was palpable, in that Osama would not have gotten killed at all - if it had not been for the decision of the President. The Commander-in-Chief was privy and decisive on every aspect of the operation, and took a very serious and calculated risk. The decision to kill Osama Bin Laden was an easy decision - but the details of how to do it and the execution of the operation was not.
I know for a fact that some operators (soldiers) in this event were trained to hastily gather paperwork, computers, photos, etc. for the purposes of intelligence - and this was done. In fact, this information has been helpful in the taking down of several other key members of Al Qaeda and various Qutbist ideo...
I was a SSG under the 1st SOC (Ft. Bragg) and am unimpressed with the statements of the interviewees in this video.
It was incumbent upon the President to break the news immediately after the operation - as the news would have been broken, with an opportunistic spin by some other interested party otherwise. This would contribute to a greater breach in security and who knows what else.
The fact that the President took a fair amount of credit was palpable, in that Osama would not have gotten killed at all - if it had not been for the decision of the President. The Commander-in-Chief was privy and decisive on every aspect of the operation, and took a very serious and calculated risk. The decision to kill Osama Bin Laden was an easy decision - but the details of how to do it and the execution of the operation was not.
I know for a fact that some operators (soldiers) in this event were trained to hastily gather paperwork, computers, photos, etc. for the purposes of intelligence - and this was done. In fact, this information has been helpful in the taking down of several other key members of Al Qaeda and various Qutbist ideologues.
As far as the alleged 'leaks' from the White House - it's largely speculation - and all of the information put out regarding this operation was information that could be deduced anyway by anyone familiar with military SOP.
None of this was haphazardly handled. It is the responsible duty of the administration to present to the public tactical-yet-credible information that will purposefully manipulate whatever enemy may listen - to further actions that will cause their own capture. These CIA officers should already know this.
...and this is what happened - shortly after this raid - predictable events transpired that enabled this administration and military to advance this war on terror in OUR favor. In short, the enemy predictably further entrenched themselves into a trap.
These criticisms - on this video - are short-sighted and sophomoric and I can hardly believe that they are coming from any legitimate and experienced sources.
As far as a 'kill list' -
There has always been a kill list. There are enemies of liberty and justice who quite simply must die. There has been a kill list since Eisenhower and there are covert operations designed to address them.
This video underestimates the tactical benefit of psychological operations and falls prey to the very politics that it alleges to decry.
It is my opinion that Bush could have gotten bin Laden, but chose not to do it for political reasons - namely, for the expansion of Homeland Security and who knows what other deal he may have concocted. When intelligence came to us about Bin Laden - and his whereabouts, the reaction of the command was one of surprise when the mission was deep-sixed.
All in all, I cannot find fault in this Presidents' handling of this operation and his methodology with regards to it's dissemination to the public.
Ryan started his lie fest by claiming the Janesville Assembly plant closed “in 2009″.
For lie #2, he stated: “I remember President Obama visiting it when he was first running, saying he’ll keep that plant open. One more broken promise.”
For lie #3 he blamed Obama’s “terrible” energy policies for the closure of the plant stating “One of the reasons that plant got shut down was $4 gasoline. You see, this costs jobs. The president’s terrible energy policies are costing us jobs.”
In reality, the plant closed in 2008 while George W. Bush was still in office.
MSNBC’s The Ed Show put together the following chronology of the real events surrounding the closure of this Wisconsin plant:
January 20, 2001: George W. Bush took the oath of office as the 43rd President of the United States. He is re-elected in 2004 to serve through Jan. 20, 2009.
February 2008: Sen. Barack Obama campaigns for president at the Janesville Assembly plant.
June 3, 2008: GM announces it will close the Janesville Assembly plant in 2010, citing high gas prices and a sluggi...
Ryan started his lie fest by claiming the Janesville Assembly plant closed “in 2009″.
For lie #2, he stated: “I remember President Obama visiting it when he was first running, saying he’ll keep that plant open. One more broken promise.”
For lie #3 he blamed Obama’s “terrible” energy policies for the closure of the plant stating “One of the reasons that plant got shut down was $4 gasoline. You see, this costs jobs. The president’s terrible energy policies are costing us jobs.”
In reality, the plant closed in 2008 while George W. Bush was still in office.
MSNBC’s The Ed Show put together the following chronology of the real events surrounding the closure of this Wisconsin plant:
January 20, 2001: George W. Bush took the oath of office as the 43rd President of the United States. He is re-elected in 2004 to serve through Jan. 20, 2009.
February 2008: Sen. Barack Obama campaigns for president at the Janesville Assembly plant.
June 3, 2008: GM announces it will close the Janesville Assembly plant in 2010, citing high gas prices and a sluggish economy. U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan writes a letter urging GM to keep the plant open.
June 20, 2008: GM announces additional layoffs at the Janesville Assembly plant.
June 28, 2008: Gas prices peak at $4.12 per gallon in the U.S., a record that still stands.
September 15, 2008: Financial services firm Lehman Brothers files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history.
October 23, 2008: GM announces it will move up the closure of the Janesville Assembly plant from 2010 to Dec. 23, 2008. Merry Christmas!
December 23, 2008: last SUV rolled off the line at the GM Janesville Assembly plant.
January 20, 2009: President George W. Bush leaves office after eight years. Barack Obama is sworn in as the 44th President of the United States.
August 16, 2012: GOP vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan makes a series of false statements about the Janesville Assembly plant closure.
'Blame Bush' and your tattered 'Race Card' not acceptable.
Hang bush first, then we'll talk about Obama.
Bush didn't start a war without congress' blessing. Case Closed
Dems are pointing the finger at the 0bama regime for leaked intel. Case Pending. Your guy is going down along with his falling support.
Bush started that war with lies to congress and it's been proved. Bush will go down.
It's cut & paste propaganda from MSNBS. He did however double it's exposure since hardly no one pays any attention to MSNBS.
Say hallo to your new Commander in Chief, Romney
Or ask Obama's electioneers why it was OK to put porta potties on the grounds of a law enforcement memorial during the 2008 election at an Obama ralley
Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) on or about March 1977.
Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.
Now comes the best part! Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii , where he died.
Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.
The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.
The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or ...
Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama's current SSN) on or about March 1977.
Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.
Now comes the best part! Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii , where he died.
Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.
The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.
The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo
Soetoro simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not
receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig's Connecticut SSN for Obama.
As you can see, Congress, Social Security or any of them are doing anything about it, just covering it up.
well we can see what side of the road their loyalties lie ..
he has violated his oath of office (more than once ). and has committed treason against the const . but congress does nothing .
after repeated demands to the states reps for his impeachment ,they do nothing ,,( not even a return e-mail saying F...YOU ...! )
well it seems were heading for a martial law state (believed before the elections ).. and they get their seats for 15 yrs .. the const is nullified ..so what have they to loose ?
go look at what happens when martial law is declared ( the prez can do this w/ out congress ) ...and who retains power & for how long !!
lock & load BABBIES !
o one seems to mind what has been done to any et al GOP.
LOL Whaaaaaaa