Quantcast

Barack Obama or Mitt Romney? Which will you choose?

Mopeder 2012/04/23 11:14:11
President Barack Obama
Willard Mitt Romney
You!
Add Photos & Videos


President Obama wants America to go forward, not backwards to the failed policies of the past. He will continue taking our country forward.

Read More: http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/who-will-be-...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • marylou5 Cindy64... 2012/05/02 17:51:16
    marylou5
    +4
    Whew, thank you!
  • Cindy64... marylou5 2012/05/02 18:49:50
    Cindy64~AFCL
    +4
    Lol you are safe GF !
  • txtumlin Annie~P... 2012/05/02 21:16:03
    txtumlin
    +3
    100% correcto Miss Annie~P! :D
  • Cindy64... txtumlin 2012/05/02 23:28:26
    Cindy64~AFCL
    +2
    lol lol
  • sue Cindy64... 2012/04/30 17:08:36
    sue
    +3
    John Adams would never have endorsed the kind of religious discrimination you propose. Insults and all caps don't make what you say more compelling. You could learn a lot from your ancestor, who was indeed a wise and thoughtful man.
  • Cindy64... sue 2012/04/30 20:34:44
    Cindy64~AFCL
    +6
    Adams would NOT care for someone like you who will vote for someone who is bent on destroying the great country he fought for from people like Obama who is a tyrant . This is what my ancestor fought for !! John Adams fought against being suppressed by tyrants who were taking away their freedoms and RIGHTS !! I am sure he would like what I am doing and be very proud of me for I am willing to FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY FOR GOD AND COUNTRY ..ARE YOU WILLING TO DIE FOR YOUR COUNTRY TO SAVE OUR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS. I WOULD FOR MY GRANDCHILDREN. AND ALL THE CHILDREN IN THIS COUNTRY!! ..THIS IS WHY I AM A PATRIOT AND YOU ARE NOT... BUT ONE OF OBAMA'S SHEEP !! I too am doing the same thing fighting against a BIG Tyrant ( Dictator) Called Obama !!! I am a very proud American but many are NOT so proud to what Obama has done ..He is the SHAME of America !!
    It is so VERY SAD you are to BLIND to see it many others on here all have shown you on here and you just keep the blinders on and listen to the LIES of Obama and of the media and NEVER hear the TRUTH !! There is EVIL in the White House anyone who is 100% bent on destroying America and HURTING the people is pure EVIL in my book!! Do not give back to me if I am a racist NO I have two black & haft white grandkids ..just like ( I am just saying.. you have NOT said so) Obama is haft black and white!! Well you just do NOT get it all I am NOW truly done with you !!
  • sue Cindy64... 2012/04/30 21:34:34
    sue
    +1
    Please identify any reason that Obama is more of a "tyrant" than any other recent president. Name one way that Obama is "destroying the country" that no other president has done before.

    Please identify any reason why it would be ok to discriminate against a political candidate because of his religion (a religion he doesn't even follow, but which you have ascribed to him!) How can you not see that this is unconstitutional?
  • Cindy64... sue 2012/04/30 22:51:29 (edited)
    Cindy64~AFCL
    +6
    I just shown you one reson above!! And by the way Obama pushing the health care on everyone that was unconstitutional!! Now tell me who is unconstitutional !! obama is unconstitutional http://wtfobama.net/wp-conten... GOOD BYE YOU JUST DO NOT GET IT I GUESS YOU CAN NOT THINK !!!!
  • Annie~P... sue 2012/05/01 03:19:00
    Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel
    +5
    Please identify how any other POTUS comes close to being a coercive tyrant like Obama.
  • sue Annie~P... 2012/05/01 06:51:36
    sue
    +1
    I do not think any of our presidents have been tyrants. Congress has enough power to stop that (or even stop anything from happening like now).

    There are plenty of reasons to not like Obama. However, sweeping statements calling him a "tyrant", a "marxist", etc. are silly, especially in light of the fact that he hasn't proven to be very different from any other president we've ever had. He is continuing many of Bush's policies, which whether you like that or not, makes him not very different from Bush. Even the Patriot Act was continued, and Bush's plan for the draw down fro Iraq was followed to a T.

    By point is that he isn't that different. And the screaming poster of "tyrant" accusation can never name one policy that makes Obama so different to warrant these over the top statements.
  • Annie~P... sue 2012/05/01 22:53:52
    Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel
    +5
    Then you sue are either misinformed or naive!
  • sue Annie~P... 2012/05/02 07:39:18
    sue
    +1
    Well, I can name a lot of reasons how Obama is not that different than other presidents, and you have yet to name one way in which his is more of a "tyrant" or more of a "Marxist" than other presidents.
  • sara sue 2012/05/06 13:28:53
    sara
    +1
    He turned his back on our ally Israel telling them to give up land to the terrorist Palestinians. He tried to force Obama care down our throats before the people could even make an informed decision. He threatened seniors that they wouldn't get their social security checks unless the senate allowed him to increase spending. He went into Libya on questionable approval. He withdrew from Iraq against advice so he could say he ended the war in Iraq & now they're embroiled in a civil war with a puppet US Gov't. If it wasn't for a house Republican majority reigning him in we probably would have been involved in a war. I predict we will go to war with Iran due to Obama trying to force out the Islamic Gov't. America is a joke all over the world because of this inept baffoon trying to make friends with Islam. He says America isn't a christain nation but the fact is he's a sham, trying to kiss these Islamic terrorists Azzes. He's a traitor to everything America stands for & an evil blight on the USA
  • sue sara 2012/05/06 15:15:59
    sue
    THe land the settlements are on is not land that Israel was supposed to be on. It would be like if you went to Canada and then claimed the land you were on belonged to the US -- and then broght the army.

    Seniors were about to miss collecting their checks, because congress threatened to shut down the government (the first time) and not raise the debt ceiling causing the US to default on its loans (the second time). Seriously? I can't believe you even put this out there, because congress cost everybody a lot of money we don't have in all their stupid posturing.

    He withdrew from Iraq using the plan that Bush created with the military and which Obama also agreed to use. Do you actually read anything about the stuff you post? Bush and Obama did meet about this to make sure it was smooth, but the agreement and timeline was set up with Iraq under Bush.

    And as for Iran, if you notice, Obama is for using sanctions. It's the right that is hawking for war.

    Libya is greyer. The US is a signatory to NATO, and Congress approved the NATO resolution on using force in Libya. They did not, however, approve US troops specifically. No US troops were landed there, and after the initial intervention, the US did not lead the missions. So, was it NATO? Hard to tell.

    The US was not founded as "Christi...
    THe land the settlements are on is not land that Israel was supposed to be on. It would be like if you went to Canada and then claimed the land you were on belonged to the US -- and then broght the army.

    Seniors were about to miss collecting their checks, because congress threatened to shut down the government (the first time) and not raise the debt ceiling causing the US to default on its loans (the second time). Seriously? I can't believe you even put this out there, because congress cost everybody a lot of money we don't have in all their stupid posturing.

    He withdrew from Iraq using the plan that Bush created with the military and which Obama also agreed to use. Do you actually read anything about the stuff you post? Bush and Obama did meet about this to make sure it was smooth, but the agreement and timeline was set up with Iraq under Bush.

    And as for Iran, if you notice, Obama is for using sanctions. It's the right that is hawking for war.

    Libya is greyer. The US is a signatory to NATO, and Congress approved the NATO resolution on using force in Libya. They did not, however, approve US troops specifically. No US troops were landed there, and after the initial intervention, the US did not lead the missions. So, was it NATO? Hard to tell.

    The US was not founded as "Christian" nation. We have no national religion, and in fact, the constitution specifically forbids one, and protects religious expression of all kinds. If you look at US law, only two of the ten commandments are even illegal. In what way are our laws "Christian" or "Biblical"? While the population is majority Christian, there are as many ways to be Christian as there are to be Muslim. As for terrorists, if what you say is even remotely true, why would Obama have been so much more successful in dismantling El Qaeda leadership than the previous administration?
    (more)
  • Singerar Cindy64... 2012/04/30 22:23:13
    Singerar
    +1
    Did you know that John Adams was a raging alchoholic and didn't know his NAME half the time? Do your research!
  • Cindy64... Singerar 2012/04/30 22:49:21 (edited)
    Cindy64~AFCL
    +5
    What are you one of Sue's friends..I bet you are!! !! Oh yes you are a LIB you are soooooo WRONG!!
    John Adams (October 30, 1735 (O.S. October 19, 1735) – July 4, 1826) was an American Founding Father, lawyer, statesman, diplomat and political theorist. A leading champion of independence in 1776, he was the second President of the United States (1797–1801). Hailing from New England, Adams, a prominent lawyer and public figure in Boston, was highly educated and represented Enlightenment values promoting republicanism. A Federalist, he was highly influential and one of the key Founding Fathers of the United States. He was NOT a raging alchoholic ! why I hate libs liberals no brain
  • Singerar Cindy64... 2012/04/30 23:03:26
    Singerar
    +1
    Ahhhhh, more pictures. I see you like pictures.
  • Singerar Singerar 2012/04/30 23:16:44
    Singerar
    +1
    Take Jefferson's primary rival, John Adams. According to a descendant of his, "To the end of John Adams' life, a large tankard of hard cider was his morning draught before breakfast." Get the man to the Betty Ford Center!

    How do we know the founding fathers as a group drank a lot? Well, for one thing, we have records of their imbibing. In 1787, two days before they signed off on the Constitution, the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention partied at a tavern. According to the bill preserved from the evening, they drank 54 bottles of Madeira, 60 bottles of claret, eight of whiskey, 22 of porter, eight of hard cider, 12 of beer and seven bowls of alcoholic punch.

    That's more than two bottles of fruit of the vine, plus a few shots and a lot of punch and beer, for every delegate. Clearly, that's humanly impossible. Except, you see, across the country during the Colonial era, the average American consumed many times as much beverage alcohol as contemporary Americans do. Getting drunk - but not losing control - was simply socially accepted.
  • Annie~P... Singerar 2012/05/01 03:22:00 (edited)
    Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel
    +5
    More made up, rewritten regressive history Singerar? So once again nothing but regressive insults cause you have nothing else?
  • Singerar Annie~P... 2012/05/01 16:53:20
    Singerar
    +1
    Oh my, all you have to do is take any tour in Boston or DC to find about about the drinking habits of some of our illustrious fore fathers. Also, since you obviously have a computer or a library near by...you can check out the facts there also.
    Live in your la la land all you want. History doesn't change.
    Read about Jefferson....that one was a Pistol!!!
  • Annie~P... Singerar 2012/05/01 22:56:52
    Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel
    +3
    And thats all you are focused on?
  • Singerar Annie~P... 2012/05/02 00:19:08
    Singerar
    +1
    That's all Cindy is focused on... Go hassle her.
  • Annie~P... Singerar 2012/05/02 06:21:16
    Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel
    +5
    Hassle? You mean like what you and your 2 buddies have been doing here ?
  • Cindy64... Annie~P... 2012/05/02 23:29:22
    Cindy64~AFCL
    +3
    Yeah REALLY !!!
  • Singerar Annie~P... 2012/05/03 02:28:27
    Singerar
    What two buddies?
  • txtumlin Singerar 2012/05/05 22:41:35
    txtumlin
    +2
    You were the one that brought up the 'raging alcoholic' card. Not Cindy, yet you spew, quote;

    "That's all Cindy is focused on... Go hassle her." Unquote.

    YOU are the instigator, not Cindy.
  • Singerar txtumlin 2012/05/05 23:08:06
    Singerar
    I just gave her a fact...
  • marylou5 Singerar 2012/05/02 01:57:23
    marylou5
    +5
    That information didn't originate in Boston...that's a California re-write!
  • Singerar marylou5 2012/05/03 02:28:53
    Singerar
    Nope
  • Cindy64... Annie~P... 2012/05/02 04:05:45
    Cindy64~AFCL
    +5
    YEP They love to make up things !!
  • Annie~P... Cindy64... 2012/05/02 06:28:04
    Annie~Pro American~Pro Israel
    +5
    Thats what regressives are the best at, rewriting history. No wonder Texas took over the 'overseeing' of text book writing even though the committee was half regressive. At least they didn't have total freedom to jack around with everything. Yep, a couple of times when regressives didn't get their way when text books were being written, they stumped out of the room like spoiled, entitled little kids. Too bad they didn't just quit!! Our children would have been better off if they had.
  • Cindy64... Annie~P... 2012/05/02 14:49:08
    Cindy64~AFCL
    +3
    Boy ...I agree with you 100% you are so RIGHT and true about the text books . The regressives are just that nothing but to me anti-amercan and bent on destroying america ..this is why the love Obama !!
  • txtumlin Cindy64... 2012/05/05 22:43:53
    txtumlin
    +2
    Right again, Miss Cindy!
  • Cindy64... txtumlin 2012/05/05 23:47:02
    Cindy64~AFCL
    +1
    Thanks dear friend!! :-)
  • txtumlin Annie~P... 2012/05/05 22:42:59
  • marylou5 Singerar 2012/05/02 01:53:09
    marylou5
    +3
    And besides they did not have central heat...they were clever and did it from the inside..... out :-)
  • Singerar marylou5 2012/05/03 02:31:35
    Singerar
    +2
    I don't understand what you are saying. This blog got flooded so I have no idea what you are responding to. Sorry.
  • Eastexn25 Singerar 2012/05/04 20:54:28
    Eastexn25
    +2
    Jefferson?? LOL a slave owner who impregnated his female slaves.... Kept the blacks in their place didn't he? A 'statesman' any Democrat of today would be proud of!
  • Singerar Eastexn25 2012/05/04 20:58:59
    Singerar
    +1
    What are u talking about? I know Jefferson was a whore.
    I dispise him.

    Pistol...down south is a Negative connotation. Not a good one. At least where I'm from.
  • Eastexn25 Singerar 2012/05/04 21:27:24
    Eastexn25
    +2
    My bad then, but you were quoting Jefferson to besmirch JQ Adams. In my opinion Jefferson was far more the immoral pariah than Adam's ever was.
    'Being a pistol' here in Texas at least, is a reference for someone having a lot of energy or spunk and it is usually a positive.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/19 11:50:18

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals