Barack Obama is an illegal fraud in the White House!

Yankee Traveler 2012/06/30 13:33:40

American politicians and the media are
lying to the American people. They do so because they hope that their
complicity in the greatest fraud in U.S. history will be overtaken by
events, that is, the 2012 election. It is the Big Stall to cover up the
Big Lie.

In the Russian language there is a term
called "vranyo." It is loosely defined as telling a white lie or a
semi-truth. It may contain fantasy or involve the suppression of
unpleasant parts of the truth.

In regard to Obama's ineligibility and
his alleged felonies, politicians and the media expect the American
people to respond in this way:

"You know that you are lying, I know
that you are lying, and you know that I know that you are lying, but we
both smile and nod in agreement."

Barack Obama, according to Article II,
Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution, is an illegal President.
The law requires a candidate for the Presidency to be a "natural born
citizen," that is, a second generation American, a U.S. citizen, whose
parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate's birth.

Obama's father was a citizen of Kenya
and a British subject at the time of his birth, which made him forever
ineligible for the Presidency. For the same reason, Florida Republican
Senator Marco Rubio is ineligible for the Presidency and Vice Presidency
because his parents were Cuban citizens, not U.S. citizens at the time
of his birth.

There is no ambiguity, although those who wish to undermine the Constitution would like the American people to think otherwise.

The difference
between "citizen," that is, born in the U.S. and "natural born citizen"
has been clear since the adoption of the U.S. Constitution on September
17, 1787.

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 states:

"No Person except a natural born
Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption
of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;
neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have
attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a
Resident within the United States."

A first draft of what would become
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, submitted by Alexander Hamilton to the
Constitutional Convention on June 18, 1787 stated:

"No person shall be eligible to the
office of President of the United States unless he be now a Citizen of
one of the States, or hereafter be born a Citizen of the United States."

Fearing foreign influence on a future
President and Commander in Chief of the American military, the future
first U.S. Supreme Court Justice, John Jay, on July 25, 1787, asked the
convention presiding officer George Washington to strengthen the
requirements for the Presidency:

"Permit me to hint, whether it would be
wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of
Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to
declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the American army shall
not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen."

The term "or a Citizen of the United
States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution" referred to
loyal Americans who lived in the thirteen colonies at the time of the
Revolutionary War, thus establishing the first generation of United
States "citizens," upon which future "natural born" citizens would be
created. The Founders, under Article II, allowed these original U.S.
citizens to be eligible for the Presidency.

As understood by the Founders and as
applied to the U.S. Constitution, the term "natural born citizen"
derived its meaning less from English common law, than from the
codification of natural law described by Emerich de Vattel in his 1758
book "The Law of Nations."

They knew
from reading Vattel that a "natural born citizen" had a different
standard from just "citizen," for he or she was a child born in the
country to two citizen parents (Vattel, Section 212 in original French
and English translation).

That is the definition of a "natural
born citizen," as recognized by numerous U.S. Supreme Court and lower
court decisions (The Venus, 12U.S. 253(1814), Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S.
242 (1830), Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856), Minor v. Happersett,
88 U.S. 162 (1875) , Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F. Cas. 582 (C.C.W.D. Ark
1879), United States v. Ward, 42 F. 320 (1890); Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S.
649 (1898), Ludlam, Excutrix, & c., v. Ludlam, 26 N.Y. 356 (1863)
and more) and the framers of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the 14th
Amendment, the Naturalization Act of 1795, 1798, 1802, 1885, and our
modern 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401.

There are historical arguments
too numerous to include in a short article, which explain why the
definition of "natural born subject," as found in the English common
law, was not used as the basis of "natural born citizen" in the U.S.
Constitution because Great Britain was a monarchy and the new nation was
a constitutional republic.

Legal precedent and interpretation leave no doubt regarding the meaning of "natural born citizen."

The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)

"The citizens are the members of the
civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to
its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives
or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens."

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)

"The citizens are the members of the
civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to
its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives,
or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who
are citizens."

John Bingham, father of the 14th
Amendment, which gave citizenship to American slaves after the Civil
War, stated on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives in 1862:

"All from other lands, who by the terms
of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become
naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other
persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no
other sovereignty, are natural born citizens."

In 1866, Bingham also stated on the House floor:

"Every human being born within the
jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any
foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a
natural born citizen."

Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)

"The Constitution does not in words say
who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to
ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the
framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all
children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became
themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or
natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some
authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the
jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As
to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first."

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

"At common law, with the nomenclature of
which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never
doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its
citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were
natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or

In the first of many recent efforts to
amend the Constitutional requirement of "natural born" citizenship,
Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham introduced House Joint
Resolution 33 (1975), which clearly recognized the distinction between
"citizen" and "natural born citizen."

"Provides that a citizen of the United
States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be
ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen."

In a September 2008 Michigan Law Review
article entitled "Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause,"
Lawrence B. Solum, then John E. Cribbet Professor of Law at the
University of Illinois College of Law, wrote:

"What was the original public meaning of
the phrase that establishes the eligibility for the office of President
of the United States? There is general agreement on the core of its
meaning. Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the
United States is a natural born citizen."

If you are unwilling to accept the
exhaustive legal documentation regarding the true meaning of "natural
born" citizenship, you may also try the common sense question:

Why has every President since Martin van
Buren been a second generation American except Obama and Chester A.
Arthur, who also lied about his personal history?

According to his own autobiography
"Dreams from My Father," Barack Obama is not a "natural born citizen"
and, therefore, is an illegal President. An imposter to the very highest level! Every law that he has signed
and every appointment that he has made is invalid.

It is time has come for us to take back our country!

Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Chi~Cat 2012/06/30 13:45:58 (edited)

    obama usurper song video
    Hell, we never believed in that POS. EVAH.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest

  • Southern Man 2012/06/30 17:40:46
    Southern Man
    In 0bama I see a man appealing to the worst in Americans, while also showing complete disdain, and contempt for our nation's laws, as he tries to secure his own reelection.
    0bama is now engaged openly in creating a new form of dictatorship, as he violates and ignores the US Constitution, aided by the news and entertainment media elite who support him, and who carefully created and protect his false image. 0bama is the ultimate creation of the leftist progressive movement in America.
    0bama truly cares nothing for America, or Americans, as he seeks to remain in power only to bring about the progressive socialist utopia both he and his supporters absolutely crave.
  • jimmy Souther... 2012/07/01 15:45:20
  • The Duke 2012/06/30 17:00:58
    The Duke
    Very well presented. As I have said all along, where 0bama was born (Hawaii, Kenya, or the moon) is of no consequence. BOTH of his parents WERE NOT born in the U.S.

    It is also HIGHLY SUSPECT to me that Congress (translation: liberal Dems and possibly RINOs) made several attempts to change or remove the natural born citizenship clause PRIOR to 0bama's presidential campaign.

    Those factors, combined with all the secrecy and smoke and mirrors used by 0bama and his cohorts makes his eligibilty questionable at best.

    Unfortunately, their tactic of dodging the issue until after the November elections will most likely succeed.
  • ScottyG - Faqueue 2012/06/30 16:50:44
    ScottyG - Faqueue
    A lot of attorneys are working on it and they get blasted in every courtroom.

    This whole place is out of order.
  • Tuna 2012/06/30 16:41:02
    We have been chicagoized by the New Democrat Pah-Tay. al sharpton maxine waters bb king at the white house bb king at the white house obama white house party obama white house party
  • Souther... Tuna 2012/06/30 17:42:07
    Southern Man
    Them some ugly ass people
  • Tuna Souther... 2012/06/30 19:34:38
    The New faces of the Democrat Pah-Tay http://cdn2.dailycaller.com/2... van jones cynthia brown
  • Souther... Tuna 2012/06/30 21:38:36
    Southern Man
    2 more ugly ass faces
  • Max 2012/06/30 16:27:17
    It seems that the Congress couldn't care less if Donald Duck were running the show, as long as they get what they want. Please vote accordingly, in November, 2012.
  • Kane Fernau 2012/06/30 16:22:05
    Kane Fernau
    Leftists have hated America's exceptionalism for years and think we need to be brought down to the level of Greece. They gave us a COMMUNIST MUSLIM to do their dirty work.
  • Always Right 2012/06/30 15:51:01
    Always Right
    I agree, 0bama is not eligible to be President of the United States of America! 0bama should unseal his records, the LSM, along with the US citizens should demand it!
  • txtum#Clinton'sCovertCash 2012/06/30 14:52:11
    No argument from me Hollywood.
  • Mr.Steve 2012/06/30 14:32:17
  • Yankee ... Mr.Steve 2012/06/30 20:14:02
    Yankee Traveler
    They new about him thru the vetting process of when he first entered politics or earlier that that!!
  • Mr.Steve Yankee ... 2012/07/04 11:07:36
  • Ken 2012/06/30 14:16:01
    Every Congressman who does not support investigation of this fraud should be removed from office.
  • Yankee ... Ken 2012/06/30 20:16:15
    Yankee Traveler
    Let's remove them all and start all over! Let's hire people that want to work for us rather than against us! I mean what do any of them do for their constituency? Nothing! It's all about themselves!!
  • Theresa 2012/06/30 14:11:51
    Yes we all know this but what if anything can be done about it? Getting Mad and angry will not solve it. The likelihood of him causing Martial Law to be declared is extremely high. The use of Chinese and Russian Troops to keep him power is very possible. Short of an assassination there is no legal way of removing this blight.
  • Tuna Theresa 2012/06/30 16:48:09
    SECOND CONTINENTAL CONGRESS !!! Our government is broken, bought & paid for; time to start over. We are spending $1 Billion per DAY to rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan; we need to rebuild the USA from the ground UP.
  • Yankee ... Tuna 2012/06/30 20:22:19
    Yankee Traveler
    $hit can them all! Every last one of them!! Orange jump suits, nice silver bracelets, and matching leg irons for all, courtesy of the American taxpayer!!!
  • Theresa Tuna 2012/06/30 21:55:39
    Yes that is what a Con Con can do! Clean Slate and do over.
  • Southern Man 2012/06/30 14:00:31
    Southern Man
    The only President of my lifetime who has spent millions HIDING his past, a birth certificate that everyone says is a forgery, a SS# from a dead person in CT, a corrupt media carrying the water for him...and all along you blind little Obozo sheep believe everything they feed you. Ask your self why he is hiding everything? Ask why the lame stream media helps him hide it? The lame stream media only researches Republicans and they knew the grades of George Bush before the primary season was over. Now we can't get one single shred of info on Obozo. This isn't about left or right, black or white...it's about the rule of law and whether or not we allow people to trample our laws and constitution. Wake up people!
  • Chi~Cat 2012/06/30 13:45:58 (edited)

    obama usurper song video
    Hell, we never believed in that POS. EVAH.
  • Souther... Chi~Cat 2012/06/30 14:06:17
  • SK-pro ... Chi~Cat 2012/06/30 17:16:41
    SK-pro impeachment
    He's about as transparent as trying to look through
    load of crap
  • rustyshackelford 2012/06/30 13:38:39
  • TasselLady 2012/06/30 13:36:23
    I hate to tell you, but the ENTIRE WHITEHOUSE IS A FRAUD. Impeach all of them and start over.
  • Yankee ... TasselLady 2012/06/30 13:41:36
    Yankee Traveler
    Our government needs an enema!!!!!
  • TasselLady Yankee ... 2012/06/30 13:44:30
    Yep, because we all know our government has been full of it for years!!!!

    Give 'em the good old soap suds enema!!!!
  • The Duke TasselLady 2012/06/30 17:06:45
    The Duke
    Better yet, an enema til clear, much more effective. Just had the
    equivalent of that for a colonoscopy. It was a LOT OF FUN!!! NOT!!!!
  • TasselLady The Duke 2012/06/30 18:40:27
    Yikes! I'll be due for one of those in three years. My dad just had one done recently.
  • The Duke TasselLady 2012/06/30 20:05:16
    The Duke
    The procedure was no where near the ordeal I had thought it would
    be; basically "slept" through the whole thing. But the prep for it was
    definitely no fun.
  • TasselLady The Duke 2012/06/30 20:26:28
    I hear that. My dad said the same thing.
  • Yankee ... The Duke 2012/06/30 20:24:17
    Yankee Traveler
    Thanx for sharing!!!
  • shadow76 TasselLady 2012/06/30 13:53:16
    And if Boehnor continues to do nothing, Impeach him too!
  • Souther... shadow76 2012/06/30 14:07:54
    Southern Man
    Your right it's not just libtards that are screwing us
  • shadow76 Souther... 2012/06/30 14:22:50
    Both the leaders in the House and Senate!
  • TasselLady shadow76 2012/06/30 14:22:41
    I say get rid of all of them. This government doesn't care about the American people anymore. And when people stop whining and start standing up and demanding that our government stand down, maybe THEN we'll be able to solve some problems. Many run their mouth, but when it comes to the rest of them running that's another story altogether.
  • Souther... TasselLady 2012/06/30 15:46:28
    Southern Man
    I marched on DC I was there in Sept. 09 in fact went with a bunch of people from SH
  • TasselLady Souther... 2012/07/01 12:50:50
    There you go! At least you're trying!!!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2016/02/07 10:49:31

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals