SodaHead Celebrates Green Week

Question US

Australia to implement mandatory internet censorship. What do you think of this?

XENON23 October 31, 2008 12:41:32

"AUSTRALIA will join China in implementing mandatory censoring of the internet under plans put forward by the Federal Government.

The revelations emerge as US tech giants Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, and a coalition of human rights and other groups unveiled a code of conduct aimed at safeguarding online freedom of speech and privacy.

The government has declared it will not let internet users opt out of the proposed national internet filter.

The plan was first created as a way to combat child pronography and adult content, but could be extended to include controversial websites on euthanasia or anorexia.

Communications minister Stephen Conroy revealed the mandatory censorship to the Senate estimates committee as the Global Network Initiative, bringing together leading companies, human rights organisations, academics and investors, committed the technology firms to "protect the freedom of expression and privacy rights of their users".

Mr Conroy said trials were yet to be carried out, but "we are talking about mandatory blocking, where possible, of illegal material."

The net nanny proposal was originally going to allow Australians who wanted uncensored access to the web the option of contacting their internet service provider to be excluded from the service.

Human Rights Watch has condemned internet censorship, and argued to the US Senate "there is a real danger of a Virtual Curtain dividing the internet, much as the Iron Curtain did during the Cold War, because some governments fear the potential of the internet, (and) want to control it"

Groups including the System Administrators Guild of Australia and Electronic Frontiers Australia have attacked the proposal, saying it would unfairly restrict Australians' access to the web, slow internet speeds and raise the price of internet access.

EFA board member Colin Jacobs said it would have little effect on illegal internet content, including child pornography, as it would not cover file-sharing networks.

"If the Government would actually come out and say we're only targeting child pornography it would be a different debate," he said.

The technology companies' move, which follows criticism that the companies were assisting censorship of the internet in nations such as China, requires them to narrowly interpret government requests for information or censorship and to fight to minimise cooperation.

The initiative provides a systematic approach to "work together in resisting efforts by governments that seek to enlist companies in acts of censorship and surveillance that violate international standards", the participants said.

In a statement, Yahoo co-founder and chief executive Jerry Yang welcomed the new code of conduct.

"These principles provide a valuable roadmap for companies like Yahoo operating in markets where freedom of expression and privacy are unfairly restricted," he said.

"Yahoo was founded on the belief that promoting access to information can enrich people's lives, and the principles we unveil today reflect our determination that our actions match our values around the world."

Yahoo was thrust into the forefront of the online rights issue after the Californian company helped Chinese police identify cyber dissidents whose supposed crime was expressing their views online.

China exercises strict control over the internet, blocking sites linked to Chinese dissidents, the outlawed Falun Gong spiritual movement, the Tibetan government-in-exile and those with information on the 1989 Tiananmen massacre.

A number of US companies, including Microsoft, Cisco, Google and Yahoo, have been hauled before the US Congress in recent years and accused of complicity in building the "Great Firewall of China".

The Australian Christian Lobby, however, has welcomed the proposals.

Managing director Jim Wallace said the measures were needed.

"The need to prevent access to illegal hard-core material and child pornography must be placed above the industry's desire for unfettered access," Mr Wallace said."

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24568137-2862,...
I think this...
I think that....
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Comment
  • +4 raves tibetsun November 01, 2008 00:53:06
    tibetsun

    I think that....

    Once censorship starts, it will spread to other areas of the internet--they never seem to know, or care about limits. Australia's new leader has made some statements regarding other nationalities, and religions--that they should be more Christian. Sound familiar?
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • T-Time1 November 01, 2009 13:29:59
    T-Time1

    I think this...

    is Pathetic that the people have allowed it!! Time to get ready for the big fight America!!
  • +3 raves
    Foo Master Angie November 04, 2008 17:02:07
    Foo Master Angie

    I think that....

    It's great to live in a country, where we have the right to freedom of speech written down. Now, let's make sure we're all willing to fight for that right, when (that's right, WHEN) the time comes.
  • +2 raves
    sally November 03, 2008 05:06:02
    sally

    I think that....

    That's scary. I agree with them wanting to block child pornography sites, but this could definitely lead to some undesirable extremes.
  • +3 raves
    chiglet - Daedric Sigil Mag... November 03, 2008 04:04:26
    chiglet - Daedric Sigil Mage, Smirotiel

    I think that....

    there's gonna be a lot of underground internet coming to Australia
  • +2 raves
    crsone November 02, 2008 21:36:53
    crsone

    I think that....

    this is hard to believe, and if true, shocking from an advanced democracy.
  • +1 raves
    XENON23 crsone November 02, 2008 23:07:41
    XENON23
    What, This shocks you?
  • T-Time1 crsone November 01, 2009 13:25:08
    T-Time1
    all thier guns have been confiscated as well as in the UK!
  • +2 raves
    i812 November 02, 2008 19:59:14
    i812

    I think that....

    i think that is what we are all headed for. just give the d=bags time to work it out so it will look like they are working for you and trying to save you from yourself.
  • +3 raves
    Dwight Mann November 02, 2008 00:17:19
    Dwight Mann

    I think that....

    I think that it will limit a free persons choices, and allow Øbamas to campaign unfettered, and damage what ever they want, wantonly, just as the media does today
  • +3 raves
    no Kidding November 01, 2008 15:20:55
    no Kidding

    I think this...

    I have net associates in K.L. Indonesia, They have massive government censorship. My fear is the slippery slope effect when countries of the free world slowly start censoring based upon an open ended policy today Child porn tomorrow the world.
  • +3 raves
    Jacqui November 01, 2008 05:48:52
    Jacqui

    I think that....

    I will fight this draconian regime for as long as it has legs to stand on!!
    Kevin Rudd better keep an eye on Melbourne and be prepared for what we are going to rain down on him!!!!
    Censorship in Australia?! I don't think so!
  • +3 raves
    Howard Beale II November 01, 2008 03:13:50
    Howard Beale II

    I think this...

    Add Japan to the list in addition to China and Australia. As of December, the Japanese government is going to start deleting blogs and arresting blog owners. Fascism sucks!
  • +1 raves
    meeee November 01, 2008 02:26:12
    meeee

    I think this...

    leave it free we have a right to say and read what we wiant.
  • +4 raves
    tibetsun November 01, 2008 00:53:06
    tibetsun

    I think that....

    Once censorship starts, it will spread to other areas of the internet--they never seem to know, or care about limits. Australia's new leader has made some statements regarding other nationalities, and religions--that they should be more Christian. Sound familiar?
  • +1 / -1 raves
    Diane October 31, 2008 20:23:26
    Diane

    I think that....

    The internet has done much good, but it also has it's down side. Obviously China would control their governmental news. Austrailia's intent seems to much less inhibitive and probably much needed. Child porn is wrong in so many ways. We will have our access controlled soon, too. Because our criminal laws have very little meaning anymore, there has to be a way to control people in another sense. I, though, feel that an eye for an eye is a great way to keep people in line.
  • +1 / -2 raves
    Jon October 31, 2008 16:13:07
    Jon

    I think this...

    is bogus, but maybe Australia and china have more security issues, than the US, when it comes to the Internet. However, I think it would be a good idea, if the USA was to do it, as well.
  • +1 raves
    Dave Sawyer ♥ Child of God ♥ October 31, 2008 14:57:54
    Dave Sawyer ♥ Child of God ♥

    I think this...

    If I agreed that illegal and immoral were always the same, great! But I fear that things will be made illegal to suit some special interests.
  • +2 raves
    barkbark-247 October 31, 2008 14:56:57
    barkbark-247

    I think this...

    WERE NEXT .... and for sure if osama hussein get's in....communist scumbag
  • +2 raves
    Mike (the original sodahead... October 31, 2008 14:51:33
    Mike (the original sodahead 'Mike')

    I think this...

    Thank God I don't live in Australia where speech is a privilege rather than a right.
  • +1 raves
    Jacqui Mike (t... November 01, 2008 05:54:32
    Jacqui
    Mike, do you mind if I steal that line?
    it represents a terrifying picture for Australia....when I have grown up with the echo of
    "Thank god we live in Australia, where we are free!"
    ringing in my ears!!
    -Now it seems my generation is going to be the ones fighting for it!!
  • +2 raves
    Mike (t... Jacqui November 01, 2008 21:32:58
    Mike (the original sodahead 'Mike')
    Please feel free. Far too many people accept the principle that government grants us things rather than government exists to protect us from losing things that are natural rights.
  • T-Time1 Mike (t... November 01, 2009 13:27:34
    T-Time1
    and gun ownership is no more!! In a 2 week period all guns from Australia were confiscated!
  • +3 raves
    FireBalls-STAND UP united October 31, 2008 14:51:17
    FireBalls-STAND UP united

    I think this...

    Wrong Idea

    But hay if we keep puting dems in office it will be here soon
  • +2 raves
    daehados October 31, 2008 13:35:20
    daehados

    I think this...

    This is wrong on so many levels. First of all, censorship is evil. Secondly, it won't work. It's pretty clear that this is proposed by someone with a series-of-tubes style understanding of the technology.
  • +3 raves
    MOM October 31, 2008 12:55:04
    MOM

    I think this...

    moderated...
  • +5 raves
    daehados MOM October 31, 2008 13:37:24
    daehados
    I agree that parents should try to shield their kids from harmful content on the internet. But it remains a task for parents; not for the government.
  • +3 raves
    MOM daehados October 31, 2008 13:41:49
    MOM
    moderated...
  • +3 raves
    daehados MOM October 31, 2008 13:45:15
    daehados
    I only know of one Internet filtering technology that actually works: Parents' watchful eyes :)
  • +2 raves
    MOM daehados October 31, 2008 13:51:35
    MOM
    moderated...
  • +1 raves
    troy82 - Christ is returnin... October 31, 2008 12:50:52
    troy82 - Christ is returning, Today!

    I think that....

    I think it is a wonderful idea, but will be used more for governmental control of news just like in China. Sad part is, oboma already has "mind control" over the msm and how many followers,don't tell me he would'nt like to look into this system! governmental news china sad oboma mind msm followersdont
or
Cancel