Artificial War On Christmas Campaign Launches Fake Obama "Christmas Tree Tax" This was started under the Bush administration and it's not a tax.

Right-wing
media figures are accusing the Obama administration of seeking to impose a tax
on Christmas trees; but the
Christmas tree industry has been working since 2008 -- before
President Obama
was elected -- to partner with the Department of Agriculture and establish a marketing
campaign funded by tree growers in order to promote the
sale of fresh Christmas
trees.

On November 8, the Federal Register published
a rule establishing a program within the U.S. Department of Agriculture "to strengthen the
position of fresh cut Christmas trees in the marketplace and maintain and
expand markets for Christmas trees within the United States":

USDA received a proposal for a national
research and promotion program for Christmas trees from the Christmas Tree
Checkoff Task Force (Task Force). The program will be financed by an assessment
on Christmas trees domestic producers and importers and would be administered
by a board of industry members selected by the Secretary of Agriculture
(Secretary). The initial assessment rate will be $0.15 per Christmas tree
domestically produced or imported into the United States and could be increased
up to $0.20 per Christmas tree. The purpose of the program will be to
strengthen the position of fresh cut Christmas trees in the marketplace and
maintain and expand markets for Christmas trees within the United States.

The Task Force proposed that a referendum be
held among domestic producers and importers three years after the first
assessments begin to determine whether they favor continuation of the
program.

Led
by the Drudge
Report and Fox
Nation, right-wing media figures immediately leaped on the rule, calling it
President Obama's "Christmas
tree tax":

Gateway Pundit blogger Jim Hoft said the "Christmas Tree Tax" illustrated that "Barack Obama hates Christians."

Far
from a tax initiated by the Obama administration, the proposal to create an
assessment on tree growers to fund a research and promotion program through the USDA was begun by the industry during the Bush
administration.

In
February 2008, faced with declining sales, members of the National Christmas Tree
Association created a task force to consider
the merits of a checkoff program, which would allow the USDA to collect a fee from
growers in order to fund research into marketing Christmas trees. NCTA
officials explained:

While the fake tree industry is investing
dollars to vigorously promote their product, the Real Tree industry is pulling
back and devoting fewer funds to public relations and marketing. More than
1,000 people donated more than $900,000 for 2004 promotion and marketing
programs. By 2007, donations to the market expansion activities had dropped to
about $400,000. The erosion of funding resulted in fewer projects aimed at
positively impacting consumer attitudes about Real Trees limiting the ability
of the industry to affect the sales of Real Trees in the marketplace.



Given this continued erosion of the market share of farm-grown Christmas Trees,
an industry task force is being formed to study the possibility of a federal
marketing order that could establish a nationwide checkoff designed to support
expanded promotion, marketing and research projects.



The NCTA Board of Directors supports the industry task force study of a federal
marketing order.



Even if the industry decides to pursue a nationwide checkoff, it takes at least
a year for USDA to follow its "rule making procedures." Thus, it is highly
unlikely that a checkoff could start before 2010. In the interim, NCTA will
engage in an aggressive promotion and protection program as funds allow.



The NCTA board urges members and non-members to be involved in the discussion
and will schedule a town hall discussion at the 2008 national convention at
which time the task force will give a report.

In
April 2008, NCTA officials announced
the formation of a task force to continue studying the merits of a checkoff
program. As explained
in the Fall 2008 edition of Christmas Trees, a
leading Christmas tree magazine, fee levels are established by industry
-- not government -- and commodity growers
frequently partner with the USDA for marketing and research checkoffs:

Examples of other agricultural commodity Checkoffs include
the egg, beef, pork, mushroom, milk, and honey, etc. industries. We're all
familiar with the Dairy industry's ad campaigns; "Milk Does a Body Good" and
"Got Milk." "Pork: the Other White Meat," "Beef: It's What's for Dinner" and
"The Incredible Edible Egg" are recognizable slogans developed and funded by
Checkoff programs. These four 'big guns' collect between $45 and $91.2 million
in assessments annually.



Funding for
promotions and research comes from within each industry. Fees could be assessed
for example, in the Christmas tree industry, on a percentage of the selling
price, per cut tree or per seedling basis. The amount of the assessment, who
would participate, how the fees would be collected and how utilized, would be
determined by the industry taskforce with the input of growers and attendees at
the National Convention. Fresh imports (mainly from Canada) would be assessed
at a comparable rate. As in other agricultural industries there would be
exemptions for smaller growers. If the assessment is made on a cut tree basis,
4,000 trees has been discussed as a minimum. A percentage of the amount
collected could go to state associations in proportion to the amount paid from
within that state. The state association could utilize the funds for promotion
and research abiding by the same rules as the national Checkoff organization.
Hugh anticipates that Christmas tree assessments would be comparable to the
amount raised by the blueberry industry, which is $2 million.

Lying Sodaheads or at least very gullible.

http://tinyurl.com/dx3fz78