Quantcast

Armed citizens descend on gun banning, New Mexico Mayor

snipe 2011/09/28 01:53:44
What is it about the second Amendment that Liberal Politicians don't understand?



When Ruidoso, New Mexico Mayor Ray Alborn issued an order
banning the carrying of firearms in city owned buildings last month,
he couldn’t have imagined he would be faced with nearly 100 armed,
irate gun owners at the next meeting of the city council.

But 2nd Amendment supporters from all over
the nation came to the little town to express their outrage at Mayor
Alborn’s ham-handed affront to law abiding American citizens.


And express themselves they did as speakers went one by one to the microphone, “…most of them with their guns holstered by their sides.”


“You are just as much a tyrant for
requiring someone to surrender their civil rights to carry a firearm in
order to participate in their government as you are in asking them to
surrender their right to vote or anything else,” said one of the
meeting attendees.


Executive Director of Gun Owners of America, Larry Pratt made the trip to Ruidoso to inform Alborn that “almost all of the mass murders in our country have occurred in areas just like you’re fixing to set up, in gun free zones…”


Like so many liberal political hacks,
Alborn is convinced that guns belong only is the hands of the police,
as officers are exempt from his edict.


Also typical of his breed is Alborn’s
whining lament threatening resignation if his wishes are not followed.
“My responsibility is the health, safety and welfare of our [city]
employees so if we’re not going to be able to do these kinds of things
I’m not sure I want to be sitting in this seat,” he said upon being
confronted with the actual will of the people he was elected to
represent.


Frankly, someone should inform Mayor
Alborn that his real “responsibility” is upholding the Constitution
of the state of New Mexico and securing the rights guaranteed by that
document to the people of his city.


Although the Ruidoso city council chose to
table the vote on Mayor Alborn’s gun-banning measure, two things were
made clear at the recent meeting: the right to keep and bear arms
might have surpassed Social Security as the dangerous third rail of
American politics; and when faced with overwhelming odds, a smart
police officer will not opt for enforcing an unpopular,
unconstitutional rule. For though the “No Guns Allowed” signs were
clearly posted on meeting room doors, no one paid them any notice and
not one of the attending officers said a single word about
it.


http://www.coachisright.com/armed-citizens-descend-on-gun-ban...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • *Danno* JYD - SWMTPP 2011/10/07 22:26:15
  • Ron in Oregon 2011/10/07 21:02:18
    Ron in Oregon
    +1
    Thank God I live in an open-carry state or i can carry concealed.
  • SocratesIII 2011/10/06 18:39:36
    SocratesIII
    +1
    Viva la Revolucion. Hehe
  • dick 2011/10/06 18:27:05
    dick
    +3
    What a shame another whining Liberal threatens to resign Oh well no loss! 2nd amendment

    when we depend on the government for protection we are making the first mistake!
  • Charles E 2011/10/05 13:43:06
    Charles E
    +3
    The fine citizens of Ruidoso should accept the mayors offer to resign.
    If he doesn't (he probably won't since he is a liberal) the voters should help him out at the next election. Along with every council member who did not vote to reject, rather than table, his edict.
  • lalouisiane 2011/10/03 23:10:36
    lalouisiane
    +4
    Maybe the dishonorable mayor should read the Constitution. He does seem confused on what his job is.

    I'd have to say, "Good riddance!" to that hopefully former mayor.
  • Pug For Huck 2011/10/01 20:35:23
    Pug For Huck
    +4
    He's a dried up old has-been and needs to step aside for someone with some sense.
  • Autarchic 2011/10/01 17:08:34
    Autarchic
    +4
    Good for them not saying a word about people with guns!
  • avalanche 2011/10/01 02:29:21
    avalanche
    +3
    Victims are like misery, they love company.
    I've never known an armed victim.
  • gunner 2011/10/01 02:02:26
    gunner
    +5
    They pulled this same gun ban all over Iowa. No such oposition ensued. Praise to the people who stood up to this Napoleon wanna be.
  • Nanjing03 2011/09/30 21:49:35
    Nanjing03
    +2
    I think that what a lot of people forget is that "gun control" is a relatively new phenomenon in America. It was practically unheard of until the middle of the 20th century. Its earliest widespread use was to prevent freed African-Americans from being armed after the Civil War and during Reconstruction period in the years that followed. "Jim Crow" laws included such gun control until the 1920s. Gun control was used in New York because people were fearful of Irish immigrants and likewise in Chicago because of Italian immigrants. Widespread gun control at a draconian level came about in the 60s and 70s. Is it any wonder that there was a backlash against those useless controls in the late 80s and 90s and that we are now witnessing a sharp decline of violent crime and gun accidents because of CCW reforms and the training that goes with it?
  • Charles E Nanjing03 2011/10/05 13:58:45
    Charles E
    Since you mentioned the "Civil War", 1865 with the end of that long and bloody conflict and the shooting of a president would have been the perfect time to create a national gun ban and possibly repeal the Second Amendment. Neither of these events occurred.

    Could there possibly be a better argument against gun control?
  • Nanjing03 2011/09/30 21:36:56
    Nanjing03
    +4
    Hey Mayor Alborn, if the 2nd Amendment doesn't mean anything to you, try this on for size. Today, 41 states now have a provision for "shall issue" concealed carry permits, 6 states, including Maryland, offer the more arbitrary and unworkable "may issue," and 3 states simply allow law abiding citizens to carry without a permit. Those numbers may have shifted slightly in favor of more lax gun laws because of their proven success.

    Now, in the "shall issue," states, according to the U.S. Department of Justice studies through their own National Institute of Justice /Bureau of Justice Statistics, and the FBI Uniform Crime Report, every year for the last two decades, there are fewer violent crimes and fewer gun accidents where law abiding citizens are allowed to keep and bear arms. Essentially, according to NIJ/BJS and the FBI, more guns = less crime. Naturally, the rates of decreasing violent crime and gun accidents vary according to the length of time a "shall issue" state had concealed carry in place and the percentage of citizens who choose to exercise the option. Regardless, the declining violent crime and declining gun accidents more than just correlate to the "shall issue" policies of those states.

    Just as the DOJ, NIJ/BJS, and the FBI are the hallmarks in researc...
    Hey Mayor Alborn, if the 2nd Amendment doesn't mean anything to you, try this on for size. Today, 41 states now have a provision for "shall issue" concealed carry permits, 6 states, including Maryland, offer the more arbitrary and unworkable "may issue," and 3 states simply allow law abiding citizens to carry without a permit. Those numbers may have shifted slightly in favor of more lax gun laws because of their proven success.

    Now, in the "shall issue," states, according to the U.S. Department of Justice studies through their own National Institute of Justice /Bureau of Justice Statistics, and the FBI Uniform Crime Report, every year for the last two decades, there are fewer violent crimes and fewer gun accidents where law abiding citizens are allowed to keep and bear arms. Essentially, according to NIJ/BJS and the FBI, more guns = less crime. Naturally, the rates of decreasing violent crime and gun accidents vary according to the length of time a "shall issue" state had concealed carry in place and the percentage of citizens who choose to exercise the option. Regardless, the declining violent crime and declining gun accidents more than just correlate to the "shall issue" policies of those states.

    Just as the DOJ, NIJ/BJS, and the FBI are the hallmarks in research and statistics credibility, politically motivated entities like the Brady Campaign to Prevent Handgun (formally Handgun Control, Inc.), the oddly named Violence Policy Center, and Michael Bloomberg's Mayors Against Illegal Handguns rely on discredited studies that were rejected elsewhere, or by pulling numbers out of thin air to craft an argument while they attempt to smugly and piously stand in the way of continuing reforms. Gun control was a failure. Gun control is dead. It’s time to bury it once and for all.
    (more)
  • newhon63 2011/09/30 20:41:44
    newhon63
    +2
    Sounds to me like this Mayor wants to open a cooridor so more illegals can come bouncing across the borders unchallenged.
  • Joves the Instigator 2011/09/30 02:29:01
    Joves the Instigator
    +4
    LOL! I love it when some politician thank they would get away with this in an open carry state. Here in Az there may have been more of us show up armed. Hell we are allowed to carry sidearms into the state house still. Just not court rooms, which I think is reasonable.What Im waiting for is some of our left leaning politicians to try and change our sidearm laws. They would not like our citizen response.
  • Andrew 2011/09/30 00:06:18
    Andrew
    +1
    That's tough considering especially where illegal's can cross over.
  • texasred 2011/09/29 22:42:26
    texasred
    +5
    Good for them! And this is exactly what citizens are going to have to continue doing in order to keep the government from trampling all over our rights.
  • Dennis 2011/09/29 22:14:08
    Dennis
    +3
    And yet ANOTHER example that liberalism is a disease.
  • CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2011/09/29 20:29:34
    CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    +5
    The day they try to take our guns is the day the police get a hundred million phone calls saying "Our house was just robbed and they took all my guns."
  • Evan 2011/09/29 19:03:17
    Evan
    +3
    A government that is afraid of it's people does not want them to have guns. It's called a Democracy...which actually is overrated, as I prefer a Rebublic to mob rule.
  • ronbo51 2011/09/29 17:39:49 (edited)
    ronbo51
    +9
    Shareperson who lives in this house does not have a gun please rob them

    place these signs on either side of his house and watch what he says!!!!
    WHAT A CERTIFIED DIPSTICK!!!!
  • SoCalEx-Dem 2011/09/29 16:08:30
    SoCalEx-Dem
    +4
    Damn, just when you need a video, no one had a camera or a phone. I would have wanted to see this play out.
  • schjaz 2011/09/29 15:24:38
    schjaz
    +1
    how strange. i live very near Ruidoso and i didn't hear of this.
  • Purple ... schjaz 2011/09/30 03:56:06
    Purple Pinto ~PWCM~JLA
    +3
    I didn't either and we're in Los Lunas. You would have thought one of the Albuquerque stations or Villanucci would have caught on to this.

    Hmm. ??
  • avalanche Purple ... 2011/10/01 02:30:59
    avalanche
    +4
    So much for the main stream media.
  • Purple ... avalanche 2011/10/01 03:04:59
    Purple Pinto ~PWCM~JLA
    +4
    I did find it after clicking through to the original blog, but it certainly didn't make as much headline as it should have.
  • avalanche Purple ... 2011/10/01 03:14:05
    avalanche
    +2
    Truth is becoming a phased out fad, if you want to know the truth, you must seek it.
  • Purple ... schjaz 2011/10/01 03:04:22
    Purple Pinto ~PWCM~JLA
    +3
    Here it is from KRQE. Didn't make much of a fuss over it, but it did make the news.

    http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/...
  • DDevlin780 2011/09/29 14:57:08
    DDevlin780
    +6
    Never thought I would need a gun until they started talking about taking away my right to own one. Now I have a rifle and a pistol and I practice a lot so I won't miss.
  • Brian Tristan MacQuillan 2011/09/29 06:14:24
  • T Bevan 2011/09/29 04:49:18
    T Bevan
    +4
    Gentlemen , my hat is off to you..

    www.lcsun-news.com/las_cruces...

    Lock & Load....

    Who all elected this fool?
  • Lynn 2011/09/29 04:32:33
    Lynn
    +6
    What part of "shall not be infringed" does Ray Alborn not understand?
  • MandaLynne 2011/09/29 04:01:29
  • Charles E MandaLynne 2011/10/05 14:02:14
    Charles E
    +2
    Another good post, fine lady.
  • MandaLynne Charles E 2011/10/05 14:09:02
    MandaLynne
    +1
    Thank you kindly.
  • Todd *RP 2012* 2011/09/29 02:57:14
    Todd *RP 2012*
    +5
    You'd think anyone in New Mexico, liberal or not, would have better sense than this.
    go figure.
    keep your powder dry and your head on a swivel folks.
  • Catnip 2011/09/29 02:20:54
  • WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA 2011/09/29 02:17:10
    WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA
    +4
    Another idiot politician.
  • Eddie 2011/09/29 01:17:14
    Eddie
    +3
    Let em ban all the guns they want in town as long as us ol boys out here in the country can still keep our hunting rifles and such we'll be just fine. We only go to town to buy groceries and stuff anyway. City people are crazy. They probably don't need to have guns on em' anyway. Probably shoot their fool selves trying to get it out of the holster before they can get to the bad guy anyway.
  • DS in Oak Ridge NC 2011/09/29 00:20:16
    DS in Oak Ridge NC
    +6
    City-owned buildings is a broad net to cast, and the Mayor experienced a major misfire / cartridge jam by making rules that were all about his power and not the town's safety. It is not uncommon for guns to be restricted from Schools or specific-purposed sites, but this was a ham-handed move to curtail / eliminate 2nd Amendment RIghts in Ruidoso.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 06:16:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals