Are you trying to reduce your carbon footprint?

by urwutuis Posted 2009/12/14 21:42:51

Read all 23 opinions

No matter what you hear global warming is a fact. Whether it is a natural planet cycle or the burning of fossil fuels would it not be wise to reduce carbon no mater what the cause?

More polls by urwutuis

Conservative in California 2009/12/15 04:55:16

I try to reduce energy bills, but I have never given a second's thought to my carbon footprint. If anyone ever mentioned in conversation their carbon footprint, I'd probably laugh in their face at how ridiculous they sounded.

reply
Bear 2009/12/15 04:51:21

+1
Get lost, gorefish.

reply
urwutuis to Bear 2009/12/15 22:44:27 (edited)

Yet another uninformed oil company stooge.

reply
Ladnar 2009/12/15 02:09:58

+1
Sure, we can our do our voluntary part to make out planet cleaner without falling for all the shrill and hysterical over the top lies of the global warmists and intruding Liberal legislation.

reply
urwutuis to Ladnar 2009/12/15 22:45:05

Do you think industry will do it on their own?

reply
Ladnar to urwutuis 2009/12/15 22:57:58

Whether they do or not, I don’t think it’s the place for a bunch of shrill liars to impose draconian restrictions for dubious ends.

reply
squid 2009/12/15 00:40:55

+2
It's a fact that our cooling planet is suffering from global warming. And hurdurf.

reply
Bear to squid 2009/12/15 04:52:56

+2
Wanna buy a global warming shovel?

reply
kmay 2009/12/15 00:15:47 (edited)

+3
NO!!! GW isn't fact. It is normal climate change.

reply
urwutuis to kmay 2009/12/15 22:45:46

Warming is climate change.

reply
NetRanger 2009/12/14 23:10:52

+2
I certainly am. Regardless of the Global Lie perpetrated by people only concerned with padding their bottom line using the Global Warming Hoax (now renamed "Climate Change"), I, on the other hand, think that reducing my carbon footprint will also reduce my "financial footprint". Waste is waste and I like having efficient modes of transportation (Like a motorcycle that *AVERAGES* 92mpg - No, thats not a misprint. Over 19,000 miles, 92mpg.) Reducing your carbon footprint reduces your fuel consumption and therefor your costs. If I can buy a hybrid or an electric car and justify it based on cost I will. Until then, I won't allow the establishment to screw me into thinking some kind of stupid, overly expensive mode of transportation is what I must buy to "save the environment" when it only pads their bottom line. Screw them! Leave my life alone. Less government. Better environment. Carbon Credits Are For Crap Heads and Liars like Al Whore and other dishonest bastard-thieves.

reply
urwutuis to NetRanger 2009/12/15 23:02:24 (edited)

I take it you don't think there is money in saying it's a lie and that industry will voluntarily clean up their stuff because they always have before.
What if saying that global warming is untrue is just an oil company lie?
Have you considered how much money is to be made by maintaining the status quo?

If not for Govt. regulations we would still be burning leaded gas or was that a hoax too?

The dishonest bastards are on both sides and if you listen to the evanGOP then it's pointless to even try to carry on a discussion.

How much less government? How about no more inspected meat or water? Maybe we don't really need to test drugs before we market them and we can let planes fly at whatever altitude they like.

Regardless of fossil fuel propaganda grennhouse gases are a fact

and this is only a small part of 1 freeway. This is going on 24 hrs a day, every day.

You need to wake up and smell the smog.

reply
NetRanger to urwutuis 2009/12/16 05:01:12 (edited)

For more background and a solid footing try Carbon Footprints In The Sand: http://neithercorp.us/npress/...

Ah! Well, MMGW shill, here is the deal: if you think the corrupt anti-global warming machine gives one rat's hindquarters about the environment then you're as naive as a 12 year old at a rave. Motive should be pure. If the corrupt MMGW machine were allowed full access to our citizen screwing machine (taxes, etc) do you think they would REALLY work to clean up the environment? Uh, no. Yes, pollution is a real thing but chicken-little style bullcrap emergency legislation based on anti-scientific lies will make things much *WORSE*. It will give the globalists more control of the system. If carbon belching machines makes them more money, the environment be damned, they'd poison the planet in a heartbeat and think its funny while we all die of poisoning as we gasp for air.

One thing you said was dishonest bastards are on both sides, no doubt, but truth is truth and lies are lies. Nothing ever got improved if the legislation or the idea was based on a lie.

Less government is always better. ALWAYS! Sure, corrupt people will put out faulty stuff. Oh, yeah, like drugs? Yeah, how are those government regulations on vaccines doing for you? Whats that Guillome-Bar syndrome? Oh, I fo...

For more background and a solid footing try Carbon Footprints In The Sand: http://neithercorp.us/npress/...

Ah! Well, MMGW shill, here is the deal: if you think the corrupt anti-global warming machine gives one rat's hindquarters about the environment then you're as naive as a 12 year old at a rave. Motive should be pure. If the corrupt MMGW machine were allowed full access to our citizen screwing machine (taxes, etc) do you think they would REALLY work to clean up the environment? Uh, no. Yes, pollution is a real thing but chicken-little style bullcrap emergency legislation based on anti-scientific lies will make things much *WORSE*. It will give the globalists more control of the system. If carbon belching machines makes them more money, the environment be damned, they'd poison the planet in a heartbeat and think its funny while we all die of poisoning as we gasp for air.

One thing you said was dishonest bastards are on both sides, no doubt, but truth is truth and lies are lies. Nothing ever got improved if the legislation or the idea was based on a lie.

Less government is always better. ALWAYS! Sure, corrupt people will put out faulty stuff. Oh, yeah, like drugs? Yeah, how are those government regulations on vaccines doing for you? Whats that Guillome-Bar syndrome? Oh, I forgot, that's not "scientific". More lies. Frankly, when it comes to quality assurance, government ONLY uses it as a prybar to wrench loose other rights to steal. Government regs always damage. They never repair.

Oh, and I am quite offended that you even mentioned the right leaning dishonest bastard-thieves and insinuated that I only listen to them. I think the right leaning marxists probably lie 10% less than the left leaning marxists, er, uh, democrats. Probably only because its less fashionable, not cause they give a rip.

I don't need to wake up and smell the smog. I live where there is none. You, however, need to stop drinking the government issue koolaid. The red color is not a complement to your wool.

;)
(more)

reply
NetRanger to urwutuis 2009/12/16 21:59:38

BWAHAHAHAHA! I knew it! You're just another one. Trying to make money off the lies. I followed your link. You have a conflict of interest! Most liberals do. I'm done with this question. And I'll remember your profile. MMGW shill. Another sockpuppet for greed. You don't give a darn about the environment as long as you can sell your product. In fact, you have a vested interest in perpetrating a lie. And you accuse me of listening to the evanGOP too much? You know, your TV can be tuned *AWAY* from the liberal kool aid channel!

LMAO!!!!!

reply
flaca BN-0 2009/12/14 21:58:42

Yes, if only based on the alarming rise in the need for asthmatic drugs.

reply
NetRanger to flaca BN-0 2009/12/14 23:13:17

...Yes! chemspew is bad. Less is better. Efficiency is king.

reply
Green is a color 2009/12/14 21:47:49

Not at all.

reply
urwutuis to Green i... 2009/12/14 22:11:42

y not Don't believe or don't care?

reply
Bear to urwutuis 2009/12/15 04:53:57

+2

reply
NetRanger to Bear 2009/12/16 05:43:59

Bwahahaha! Your flag cracks me up! Don't tell me: They're going to hammer it down our throats before we get too sickle. Oh! Here it comes:

Bah! Bah! Green Sheep, have you any wool?
No sir, no sir, the whole pasture's dead.

Why Sheep? Why Sheep? Why is it dead?
'Cause Al Gore's environmentalists were in league with the Fed!

reply
Green i... to urwutuis 2009/12/22 06:40:05

I think it's going to happen, no matter what humans try to do to stop it.

reply
Scott ヶBrony Of PHAETヶ 2009/12/14 21:45:17

I know I am.

reply
AmericanVirus 2009/12/14 21:43:55

+2
Nope

reply