Are YOU ready to join the TEA Party?
Always Right
2012/07/01 13:39:43
|
|
|||||
|
14 votes
|
|
33% | |||
|
14 votes
|
|
33% | |||
|
4 votes
|
|
10% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
24% | |||
With the United States Constitution being totally ignored by the executive, the legislative and the judicial branches of our government. It is time we remind them,
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Read More: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/29/tea-party-le...
Top Opinion
-
Sister Jean 2012/07/01 14:04:08NO! I will support the US Constitution.





















I fail to understand what issues people have against the TeaParty? Could it be they have bought into the liberal media bashing of their movement. I consider my self to be a TeaPartier.
I really would like to hear intelligent responses. It servers no purpose to call names and use the term Teabaggers. BTW do you really, know what the term Teabagger means?
Here are the core principles of the Tea Party:
• Limited federal government
• Individual freedoms
• Personal responsibility
• Free markets
• Returning political power to the states and the people
Please explain what problems you have with these principles?
Supporting obama is supporting Communist Manifesto.
the responses you offer baffle me:
on the one hand you seem to favor joining the Tea Partiers. yet one of your 'NO!' responses [which I take to mean, "No, I will not join the Tea Partiers" includes "I will support the Constitution" which suggests that you are perfectly aware that the Partiers are doing exactly the opposite of supporting our founding documents.
somehow, I doubt that is the impression you meant to convey. or was it?
thank you.
meanwhile, I was not the one who created ambiguous choices. that would be you. I simply pointed out the lack of logic within them.
Don't you wish you could say the same?
Nice family photograph, by the way