Are you part of the 61 % that agree with Congress on holding Holder in contempt..

Sometimes I think they just do this stuff for show.

Me too, hun.

No, another mountain out of a molehille to make the Obama Administration look bad. Pure BS.

Thank You, but I think the selling of 1000's of weapons to the drug cartels is not BS when one of our own gets killed by one of the weapons.

And who sold the guns to the Aurora killer?

I have no idea do you? I know that I heard some were purchased illegally.

Eric Holder.

I'm sure that dead guy and his family don't think it's a molehill. I'm sure the other ICE guy just shot doesn't think so either.

How can you justify that comment?

You can't hold the government responsible for every killing that takes place. There that justifies my comment.

He should be jailed.

I think so as well.
Thank You

You're welcome.

How can you get someone in his OWN DOJ to go against their boss?

That's the trick and that's why he's going to get away with it.

Pathetic state of affairs. Ignore DOMA, uphold NBP voter intimidators, laugh at subpoenas, prosecute states (AZ.+). ...etc...etc...Wretched Dept. of INJUSTICE.

It doesn't work when they are the villians.

Justice Roberts makes it all easy.. The way to repeal Obamacare is to simply repeal Obama. Sweep the whole nest of villains out. Let's keep on being the squeaky wheel.

I agree. The only way to get back to sanity is to get rid of the whackos who have invaded our great country. It's time we raised our voices.

Congress can take Holder to court: Here is a quote:
Litigation is used at times, but federal judges generally encourage congressional and executive parties to settle their differences out of court.

Thanks

You are welcome

:-))

Can they still do this after Obama and his cronies are out of office? The reason I'm asking is, even after obama's term is over, they can still discredit them for all time. (If that makes sense to you.)

They can ask the next President to release the paperwork. Congress can not do much to them at that point I do not think, but others can. The DOJ can as well.

Okay, thanks. I hope they do it.

Congress can take Holder to court: Here is a quote:
Litigation is used at times, but federal judges generally encourage congressional and executive parties to settle their differences out of court.

If we need house AND Senate, are we at an impasse?

They should have put his butt in the slammer.

I agree. Used some of the new law they have passed. Hold him in a FEMA camp without due process and without charging him.

In holding Eric Holder in consent the House has done all it can. Believe it or not, it is up to the Justice Department to prosecute those held in contempt of congress -- so Eric Holder, lacking the integrity and honesty to appoint an independent prosecutor, has decided not to prosecute himself! Big Surprise!!!

The Justice department has already said no. They could still impeach him but they would never be able to get anything done in the Senate. A bold move is they do have the authority to take him into custody, but I do not see how that would help as they would never send their guy's to seize his records using the courts. They have enough on Obama to impeach him as well, but will never do it and he has done more than Clinton ever did. Obama wrote and EO that removed their authority in a state of emergency along with the Courts. Congress did this to the courts by passing NDAA. Now the Courts have ruled that NDAA is unconstitutional. Obama ignored them and wrothe the EO. I can not say what I think should happen to him.

Before you decide to take such a drastic step, you have to decide what it would do to the nation. As evenly split as the nation is, any further action by congress at this time would be very, very divisive.

In the 1960 election Kennedy defeated Nixon by the slimmest of margins. 49.72% to 49.55% of the popular vote.

There was ample evidence that there had been extensive voter fraud in both Texas (VP Lyndon Johnson's home state) and Illinois (controlled by the Democratic party machine/thugs). Many Republicans urged Nixon to challenge the results, but whatever else you think about Nixon, he had more class than Al Gore and refused to subject the nation to the trauma of a challenge.

Nixon was a great President. His only mistake was covering up for others. He was to loyal to them. If they had been as loyal as he was they would have stepped forward and took responsibility for their action..

Here is the issue. Congress has not taken measures to present it case against The President. They have already made their case against Holder and with the help of the Presidents. When he took took executive privilege ever one knows that there is a rat in the woodwork and Obama is protecting someone, perhaps even himself for have knowledge about what was going on before the public got wind of it.

As for the President they can explain in simple terms how the President has broken his oath of office. Then they can site his EO's and the problem with ea. How he has given over powers to the UN that are only for Congress and the President. Just for giving them authority over our police and and armed forces here on American soil. In the 1800 they would have taken him out of office tried him for treason and shot him.

Again, with the nation almost evenly split and "independents" set to decide the election, it would be a dangerous thing to attempt to impeach Obama, especially with Democrats in control of the Senate where the trial would take place. Republicans controlled both houses of congress when Clinton was impeached, and they had him dead to rights for perjury and obstructing justice, but the impeachment trial in the senate still failed - and it hurt Republicans more than Clinton with the voters.

Yes I know and I think that is knowing what is in the Senate is what is keeping them form impeaching him. My real thoughts are that most of Congress does not have the peoples best interest in mind. If we do not get things straighten out this election it is time for the people to step up and throw them all out. If the people do this they need to act on the UN immediately as they will try to assume control. We would then have to ask who ever is in charge of our armed forces to take control until we can have new election. Any other process will be to slow and never work.

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
-- Thomas Jefferson

He needs to go, he is dirty.

I fully support you. He needs to go.

Definitely. But! Do you not imagine there were "others" guilty of complicity in this matter? They should be censored also.

There are others, that is why the President proclaimed Executive privilege That's is why the Justice Department has refused to investigate as they know, and Holder is their boss.
Thank You Mary

Congress faces a number of issues now, They need to remove Obama from office and the White House until he is vendicated on this Birth Certificate event or jailed for TREASON and impeached. At the moment he shopuld not serve