Are you okay with having to register your guns with the UN?
Drue-AFCL
2012/08/09 17:06:59
|
|
|||||
|
9 votes
|
|
9% | |||
|
86 votes
|
|
91% | |||
I realize that support for this useless POS of a treaty has died - actually to my surprise.
But, consider the ostensible goal of it ‘to control the illegal transfer of arms’.
Considering the disdain the UN holds for the US, and knowing that the treaty was aimed directly at the Second Amendment.
Can you guess who would be the first to be prosecuted? Think ‘Fast and Furious’.
Perhaps the current administration realized that their beloved Holder would end up being dragged in front to the UN to explain why he was transferring arms across a national border – illegally – without the knowledge of that nation.
Think about it. The reasons may go further than the obvious unpopularity of the treaty.
Analyst, Ph.D.
Sneaky Dems Attempt Gun Control In CyberSecurity Bill
By the way, watch out for the end run.
http://freedomoutpost.com/201...
ANY statute or regulation - local, state, federal, U.N. - which infringes the individual right to keep and bear arms within these United States or the affiliated territories - is null and void before the ink dries.
The unalienable human rights to life, to liberty, and to property, REQUIRE the exercise of deadly force in the protection of those rights. Any government thug in our republic who makes any effort whatsoever to impose any limitation on the private citizen's desire to acquire, practice with, and pack weapons of any kind is, ipso facto, a criminal guilty of malfeasance in public office.
L. Neil Smith's famous essay "Why Did It Have to Be...Guns?" bears reading. From that article I quote:
"Make no mistake: all politicians - even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership - hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician - or political philosophy - can be put.
"If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, ANYTHING -...
ANY statute or regulation - local, state, federal, U.N. - which infringes the individual right to keep and bear arms within these United States or the affiliated territories - is null and void before the ink dries.
The unalienable human rights to life, to liberty, and to property, REQUIRE the exercise of deadly force in the protection of those rights. Any government thug in our republic who makes any effort whatsoever to impose any limitation on the private citizen's desire to acquire, practice with, and pack weapons of any kind is, ipso facto, a criminal guilty of malfeasance in public office.
L. Neil Smith's famous essay "Why Did It Have to Be...Guns?" bears reading. From that article I quote:
"Make no mistake: all politicians - even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership - hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician - or political philosophy - can be put.
"If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, ANYTHING - without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you.
"If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims.
"What his attitude - toward your ownership and use of weapons - conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him?"
=======
See http://www.lneilsmith.org/why...
-
anyone who cares not about this leftist goal is naive.
The UN does not run this country, and its none of their damn business if I have a gun or don't have a gun. And the fools in this country that are pushing this foolishness should back off.