Quantcast

Are You Interested in the iPad Mini?

SodaHead Tech 2012/05/17 19:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Is the iPhone a little too small for your taste? Maybe the iPad is just a bit too big? Have no fear, Apple's got you covered. Business Insider reports that an iPad Mini could be on the way -- and soon. It's just a rumor for now, and it's been circulating for months, but this time the sources are apparently more credible. The iPad Mini would have a 7.85" screen compared to the iPhone's 3.5" and the iPad's 9.7".

Rumor has it that the Mini is slated to be released as early as this fall, and is be expected to fall in the $200-$250 price range. That's considerably less than expected, and about the same price as the iPhone 4S. It's also expected to have the same pixel dimensions as the iPad, which means the display will be comparable to the 4S retina display. Are you interested in the iPad Mini yet?

ipad mini
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • swp caius m... 2012/05/18 17:43:38
    swp
    +2
    Perhaps you don't appreciate what the software has to offer? It is true that they are a little pricey if you only read a list of bullet points on the hardware specs.. but the software ecosystem on Apple products is where it pays off. Things do work better in general than on any other platform out there. By that I mean that all of the software works together and makes the whole greater. For example, your iTunes library is directly accessible for background music when you make a slide show in iPhoto. When you want to share a picture the one and only address database is available from within iPhoto, you don't have to flip and cut and past images into the mail app to get access to your contacts. Same if you are receiving a photo in an email.. one click gets it into your photo library, one click shows a slide show of all attached images, no messing directly with the attachments as files... There are all sorts of little details that make the experience better. (That and the hardware is more durable and less ugly :-) - all aluminum macBook vs. a nearly all plastic Lenovo or Dell.. you can see a difference in quality, een if the tech specs are about the same for a higher price.)
  • caius m... swp 2012/05/18 17:58:11
    caius madison
    +1
    I do not use MP3 or 4 formats, I litterally ha e the largest collection of cd's ever. Well, maybe not, but the clipping and fading on ripping my cd's sucks, they still haven't made a breakthrough on improving the audio playback quality of these things as the cradles are weak as hell. I also stated that drop this thing once, game over. There is no amount of synergy (which was the term for "all the pieces working together better" you where looking for) that can constitute spending $250 on a possibilty that 1 drop ruins it all.
  • COMALite J caius m... 2012/05/18 22:16:13
    COMALite J
    +1
    Have you tried using Ogg Vorbis, or, if you’re an audiophile, Ogg FLAC?
  • caius m... COMALite J 2012/05/19 05:43:09
    caius madison
    +1
    No, can you briefe me on how this could be a game changer?
  • COMALite J caius m... 2012/05/21 04:14:08
    COMALite J
    Ogg is a platform-independent copyright-free media container file format, analogous to QuickTime .mov or Windows Media .wma / .wmv files. Container file formats are not codecs in and of themselves. A container file format contains one or more streams which are encoded by a codec.

    Vorbis is the “lossy” audio codec for the .Ogg file format. It uses much newer and better technology than .MP3, and better even than the improved .MP3pro, .MP4 AAC (Advanced Audio Codec), etc. This means that, compared to .MP3, you can get equal sound quality from a much smaller file (less than ½ the size or bitrate), or ½ the audibly perceivable sound degradation at the same file size or bitrate, or “split the difference” as you see fit.

    FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) is, as its name implies, lossless. This means that when it’s decompressed, every 1 and 0 is identical to what went into the codec at compression. While some other lossless codecs out there can produce slightly smaller files than FLAC, FLAC has the advantage of having consistently low CPU requirements for decompression no matter what compression settings were used. This means that it’s practical to store FLAC-encoded audio on a low-powered device, and only decompress it in real time as it’s playing, leaving it compressed in storage. FLAC...







    Ogg is a platform-independent copyright-free media container file format, analogous to QuickTime .mov or Windows Media .wma / .wmv files. Container file formats are not codecs in and of themselves. A container file format contains one or more streams which are encoded by a codec.

    Vorbis is the “lossy” audio codec for the .Ogg file format. It uses much newer and better technology than .MP3, and better even than the improved .MP3pro, .MP4 AAC (Advanced Audio Codec), etc. This means that, compared to .MP3, you can get equal sound quality from a much smaller file (less than ½ the size or bitrate), or ½ the audibly perceivable sound degradation at the same file size or bitrate, or “split the difference” as you see fit.

    FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) is, as its name implies, lossless. This means that when it’s decompressed, every 1 and 0 is identical to what went into the codec at compression. While some other lossless codecs out there can produce slightly smaller files than FLAC, FLAC has the advantage of having consistently low CPU requirements for decompression no matter what compression settings were used. This means that it’s practical to store FLAC-encoded audio on a low-powered device, and only decompress it in real time as it’s playing, leaving it compressed in storage. FLAC is available both stand-alone and as an alternative codec for the Ogg container. FLAC can at best reduce a music file to somewhat over ½ its size, but that still means being able to hold more songs in limited memory and bandwidth without having to sacrifice even an iota of audio quality.

    Speex is a very lossy codec for Ogg that is optimized for human speech (with no music, not even background music) and so would be great for telephony, dictation, lecture and court and police interview recording, etc. Speex can compress far more tightly than Vorbis (let alone .MP3) can while still maintaining audibly legible quality, but the presence of non-speech sounds in the mix can mess up the results. Vorbis, of course, compresses much more tightly than FLAC (or other lossless codecs).

    Theora is an Ogg video codec that’s based on the formerly proprietary but now open-source On2 VP3 codec. It’s not as good as H.264, but is about on the level of H.263.

    Ogg codecs are available (usually for free) for all major computer platforms and many portable devices. The Sansa and many other non-Apple portable media players come with Ogg Vorbis support built-in, and many others (including Apple) can download support for it.

    A big thing about Ogg and all its codecs is that they are patent-free and licensing-free. The Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG) codecs are all encumbered with patents and licensing fees, though they have loosened them up in recent years (partly due to the threat of competition from Ogg).
    (more)
  • caius m... COMALite J 2012/05/21 08:09:51
    caius madison
    I see, so I don't need this mini iPad to use this stuff?
  • COMALite J caius m... 2012/05/22 00:15:03
    COMALite J
    Right. Indeed, an i-anything (from Apple) will make it a bit harder. Apple wants you to use the proprietary MPEG4/AAC encoding from the iTunes Music Store.
  • caius m... COMALite J 2012/05/23 03:36:16
    caius madison
    cool, thank you for informing me of this. I will give these options a go. I like to vive things more than one chance, it's only fair.
  • swp caius m... 2012/05/21 15:54:51
    swp
    Having a high-tech gadget break when you drop it is not unique to Apple products and is thefore an irrelevant point.
  • caius m... swp 2012/05/23 03:32:27
    caius madison
    Drop sensitivity is always a valid point in this economy. I also don't care for their tech specs. Underpowered immediately comes to mind when I hear Apple being mentioned.
  • swp caius m... 2012/05/23 19:52:08 (edited)
    swp
    Sorry, I only meant that unless (for example) a Samsung Galaxy tablet is less likely to break, the point is neither for or against the iPad in comparison.
    Though I contest that Apple products are underpowered in general. Perhaps if you are going for computing power vs. dollars spent, then they may be considered underpowered in some cases. But Apple products have always been about more than the tech specs. The Mac Book Pro is a solid device with good specs.. most of the similarly powered competition that is cheaper is also much more cheaply made and full of plastic, and from a design perspective, horribly antiquated.
  • COMALite J swp 2012/05/18 22:12:24 (edited)
    COMALite J
    +1
    The tech specs aren’t even the same anymore. That Retina Display simply has no competition. And yes, it makes a big difference. The screen is the main way a human being receives sensory input from even a regular computer, let alone a tablet.

    The one on the Mini would be even better, with the same number of pixels in a smaller space, means higher pixel density. It would be high enough that you could hypothetically turn off the anti-aliasing on text, object-oriented graphics, and 3D graphics, and still not see any “jaggies” (visible pixels — anti-aliasing attempts to obscure these through blurring to minimize the contrast with adjacent pixels).

    As you may know from playing 3-D games, turning off anti-aliasing can speed things up a lot! It would also mean less CPU and GPU power usage, which means longer battery life.
  • swp COMALite J 2012/05/21 16:00:31
    swp
    True, Apple products do have better hardware imany cases as well.
    Though anti-aliasing is not blurring, but rather proper filtering required when representing a real analog image with digital samples.. I.e. not anti-aliasing is basically just doing it wrong... But it is true that the better the sampling resolution the less needed it would be.
    I can still see the aliasing on the clock app icon on my retina display iPod Touch... It isn't really a "retina" display, but it's damn good.
  • COMALite J swp 2012/05/22 00:25:01 (edited)
    COMALite J
    Anti-aliasing is a filtering process that does just what blurring filters do in, say, Photoshop. It’s not true blurring in the sense of making a lens go out of focus. It works by mixing the colors of adjacent pixels to form intermediate shades to try to hide the pixels from the human eye.

    True anti-aliasing works by rendering line art (including outline text generated from outline font formats such as OpenType) and 3D objects to a multiple of the destination resolution, then sampling it down to the destination resolution with filtering to determine the amount by which to mix the colors for each edge pixel.

    For instance, for 2× antialiasing, an object that will wind up being 100 pixels square would need to be rendered to a 200×200 raster buffer in memory somewhere, and from there two intermediate shades can be determined, for a total of four (full foreground, two-thirds foreground and one-third background, one-third foreground and two-thirds background, and full background). 4× anti-aliasing would require rendering to a 400×400 raster buffer but allow twice the total number of shades and thrice the intermediate shades (eight total, six intermediate). And so on.

    You’re talking to someone who used to do manual pixel-by-pixel anti-aliasing of graphics on the Commodore 64 (tricky inde...

    Anti-aliasing is a filtering process that does just what blurring filters do in, say, Photoshop. It’s not true blurring in the sense of making a lens go out of focus. It works by mixing the colors of adjacent pixels to form intermediate shades to try to hide the pixels from the human eye.

    True anti-aliasing works by rendering line art (including outline text generated from outline font formats such as OpenType) and 3D objects to a multiple of the destination resolution, then sampling it down to the destination resolution with filtering to determine the amount by which to mix the colors for each edge pixel.

    For instance, for 2× antialiasing, an object that will wind up being 100 pixels square would need to be rendered to a 200×200 raster buffer in memory somewhere, and from there two intermediate shades can be determined, for a total of four (full foreground, two-thirds foreground and one-third background, one-third foreground and two-thirds background, and full background). 4× anti-aliasing would require rendering to a 400×400 raster buffer but allow twice the total number of shades and thrice the intermediate shades (eight total, six intermediate). And so on.

    You’re talking to someone who used to do manual pixel-by-pixel anti-aliasing of graphics on the Commodore 64 (tricky indeed with its fixed 16-color palette).

    The “Retina” Display isn’t true retina-level even on the iPhone 4 and iPod Touch, let alone the Third Generation iPad, at least for people with 20/20 or better eyesight. But once they get to true retina quality, anti-aliasing would be no longer needed.
    (more)
  • swp COMALite J 2012/05/22 20:42:15
    swp
    You’re are also talking to someone who used to do manual pixel-by-pixel anti-aliasing of graphics on the Commodore 64 :-)
    3 shades of grey!
  • COMALite J swp 2012/05/23 19:48:32
    COMALite J
    Cool! Another old-timer! :-)

    Maybe you can figure out what my handle means, then?
  • Bibliop... swp 2012/05/19 18:04:05
    Bibliophilic
    Agreed, and apple products tend to retain a high percentage of their original value.
  • Bibliophilic 2012/05/18 05:49:40 (edited)
    No
    Bibliophilic
    +1
    No, not for myself I just ordered an ipod touch for 260- what's the difference? And I have a macbook pro for reading documents. Why doesn't apple work on improving its current products instead? I'd buy this as a gift for someone who doesn't have an iphone or an ipod touch- perhaps? But for myself- no- I can't carry around piles of gadgets.
  • Depsycho 2012/05/18 05:27:05
    No
    Depsycho
    +2
    ... but.... isn't that.... just an iTouch...???
  • COMALite J Depsycho 2012/05/18 22:18:44
    COMALite J
    +1
    No. The size is between the two. An “iTouch” (iPod Touch) is basically a thinner and lighter iPhone without the cell phone radio circuitry. An iPad is too big to fit even in a suit jacket pocket — you basically have to carry it around like a notepad. An iPad Mini would fit in such a pocket, while retaining all of the other features of the newest iPad.
  • Rock 2012/05/18 04:56:59
    No
    Rock
    +3
    I recently heard 51% of homes have at least 1 Apple product. The iPad mini is 1 Apple product my home doesn't need! And as someone said, I already have the mini and have since 2007...it's called the iPhone.
  • Kigan 2012/05/18 04:00:15
    No
    Kigan
    +1
    Another i-gadget which I have no reason to waste my money on.
  • the fuze 2012/05/18 03:57:40
  • Visipunkbot sXe 2012/05/18 02:58:40
    No
    Visipunkbot sXe
    +3
    Actually, I'm not very interested in Apple products. There are cheaper and better alternatives out there for every product they sell. It's all some hipster fad that keeps that crap at the top of the proverbial mountain.
  • Chloey Hamer 2012/05/18 02:49:21 (edited)
    Yes
    Chloey Hamer
    +4
    WAIT!! NO!!! I meant no... Why is the whole Dang universe centered around making new iPads? Nobody is going to die if we don't make a new one every 15 minutes... AND..All it does is make people feel bad about what they gave to their friends/family on christmas or on their birthday.
    "Oh WOW! Ipad mini! Thanks dad!"
    two minutes later: "coming out soon.....Micropad"
    "this ipad mini SUCKS. I want a bloody MICROPAD "
    (OK the ipad mini only cost me three thousand bucks this is totally reasonable *cough*Cough* sarcasm *cough*)
  • COMALite J Chloey ... 2012/05/18 22:22:52
    COMALite J
    +2
    An oldie but goodie:
  • Lisa 2012/05/18 02:31:52
    No
    Lisa
    +1
    sooooo stupid, ugh who would ever want that?
  • JCLadybug 2012/05/18 02:14:02
    Yes
    JCLadybug
    +1
    Not a bad idea....and much less than an iPad. Maybe....a good size really.
  • Fenabarb 2012/05/18 02:07:23
    No
    Fenabarb
    +1
    hey I should get paid for my opinion!
    if apple review this pole it will save them a lot of money
  • ♌βļąƈʞƦơșƐ3033♌ 2012/05/18 01:49:29
    No
    ♌βļąƈʞƦơșƐ3033♌
    +2
    I'm part of an Apple family. We love Apple products but the Mini is just dumb.
  • Carson 2012/05/18 01:37:30
    No
    Carson
    +1
    Thats called an android note.
  • alex 2012/05/18 01:26:40
    No
    alex
    +2
    How about I just get a laptop. I'm all for evolution of technology...but repetitive unneccesary stuff like this is stupid
  • louisa 2012/05/18 01:19:23
    No
    louisa
    +1
    why are they making more of these?!?
  • Jiorgia 2012/05/18 01:14:18
    No
    Jiorgia
    +1
    only because i already have a iphone 4S, ipad 3 and a macbook air.
    if i didn't already have an ipad i would look into it.
  • barby karring 2012/05/18 00:55:03
    Yes
    barby karring
    Yes buy me one"
  • Darkitec 2012/05/18 00:37:18
    No
    Darkitec
    +1
    don't they all ready have that? It's called the I-Phone.
  • becca m 2012/05/18 00:14:43
    No
    becca m
  • Wulfdane 2012/05/18 00:10:56 (edited)
    No
    Wulfdane
    +2
    The iPad sucks in any size.
  • Trish 2012/05/18 00:07:20
    No
    Trish
    +2
    I swear Apple you guys are using Steve's ideas waaaay to fast. You sure your not just pulling stuff out your ass???
  • barby k... Trish 2012/05/18 01:05:28
    barby karring
    +1
    Didn't Steve Jobs pass the torch on to apple; to carry on and continue what he created and started, because he knew that he was sick and dying.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/06/18 22:18:13

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals