Quantcast

Are You in Favor of Foie Gras Doughnuts?

SodaHead News 2011/07/19 22:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
People eat all kinds of decadent foods, like bacon double cheeseburgers smashed between glazed doughnuts.

And most of the time the only reason anyone gets mad about it is when those same uninsured gluttons end up in the emergency room with coronary disease and we all have to pick up the tab.

Enter Do or Dine's $11 foie gras-filled doughnut, which some customers described as "heaven."

But whisper the word foie gras to animal rights activists (for those not in the know it's rich, buttery duck or goose liver that has been created by force-feeding the animal) and they'll go berserk. The Brooklyn eatery is now on the receiving end of a petition drive started by a vegan blogger demanding it pull the stunt menu item.

"Birds should not have to suffer for donuts. Please remove this dish from the menu," reads the petition. The petition has 658 signatures so far, but Do or Dine chef Justin Warner told Gothamist that it's not going nowhere.

"People love this dish," he said. "They go crazy for it. But I'm lucky if I serve 30 doughnuts a week—we're not exactly cranking them out over here. People all over the world are signing this petition, condemning us, telling us we're monsters, but the one percent of people who are actually coming here and eating them are pretty jazzed."

Then again, he's not "so attached to anything on the menu," which changes weekly, so it could disappear at any point.

Doughnut lovers have launched their own petition, with supporters writing, "It would be cruel to stop making them several times a day before I have a chance to come and try them. They sound like the kind of thing I'd want to eat enough of that I'd be engorged to ten times my healthy size. But I'm willing to suffer for donuts."

Are you for or against the foie gras doughnuts?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Jana ♥ ♥ ♥ 2011/07/20 14:48:53
    I think the foie gras doughnuts are...
    Jana ♥ ♥ ♥
    +7
    Never tasted them and never will,These people make me sick the way these animals are treated.I had never heard of this until today and have just read about it,they say the animals are not harmed I am sorry but from what I have seen I don't believe it.To force something down its throat just so its liver can get fat,poor animals.I wish people would get it through their thick heads that animals have feelings too.We all should be more considerate of the animals. liver fatpoor animals people heads animals feelings considerate animals Foie Gras

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • mae 2011/07/20 18:44:19
    No, foie gras is horrible (both in taste and for the animals who suffer)
    mae
    +1
    A gourmet food whose time has come--and gone. Stuffing ducks and geese to produce a fatty liver, then killing them is disgusting to say the least. Foie gras is doing to the eater what was done to the duck--it gives you a momentary taste-and-pleasure stroke, then if you eat enough, you'll have a real stroke. Go ahead. Keep eating it....It'll kill you.
  • Depsycho 2011/07/20 18:05:37
    No, foie gras is horrible (both in taste and for the animals who suffer)
    Depsycho
    That's just gross... and I'm not an animal right's activist, but I know torture when I see it. Slitting the throats of cows and twisting a chicken's neck to break it are one thing, but force-feeding to ANY species is just... ugh. So wrong.

    Besides I don't like liver, and I definitely don't think I'd like the taste of MEAT of ANY kind inside A DONUT. I like sweet and salty things, but geez, there's boundaries that SHOULDN'T be crossed!!
  • cinbadl 2011/07/20 17:13:33 (edited)
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 17:30:30
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    A logical fallacy!? No way! A pointless and utterly meaningless shifting of the goal posts. This is an obvious defense mechanism, likely brought about by your inability to ponder the actual issue at hand (ie cognitive dissonance). Sad.
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 17:38:12
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 17:45:58 (edited)
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    +1
    Of course it is--where do you come up with the moral equation that one form is better than the other? I acknowledge and am against the torture of dogs in China, as I acknowledge and am against the torture of ducks for the production of these donuts. You're the one being inconsistent, not myself. And the picture you posted of the hunters? How can I take your position on the mistreatment of animals seriously?
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 17:58:25
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 18:29:12 (edited)
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 18:36:20
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 19:26:26
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    Did I say the HARES cared? No, I said the decision to form them into a sentence is indicative of psychological "issues" on the part of the people that did it. If you don't see this, then I can only conclude that you share the same. Way to shift the goal posts yet again. I already corrected myself on the vegan thing so you're beating a dead horse in regard to that.
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 19:27:44
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    Are you afraid to actually confront your conflicting behaviors? You still haven't justified why the dogs' suffering trumps that of the ducks. If my mom was being a sadistic weirdo yes I would talk to her like that.
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 19:47:17
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 19:49:14
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    Again, WHAT IS YOUR POINT? You still have not answered why the puppies suffering is more important than that of the birds. Showing me pictures of a dog hunting just shows you are seriously mentally challenged! The dog can't ponder it's actions, you strange old woman!
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 19:54:22
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 19:58:09
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 20:03:42
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    None of this answers why the suffering of the ducks objectively is less valuable than that of the dogs. Just a list of logical fallacies and basically you celebrating the fact that you make decisions based on emotion rather than logic. I like dogs better than cats, doesn't mean I'm going to feel justified in killing and eating a cat...want to try answering the actual question?
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 20:12:24
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 20:14:10
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 20:26:03
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 20:31:48
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    Old lady troll.
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 20:27:57 (edited)
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 20:31:33
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    ? this has nothing to do with anything
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 20:42:08
  • mae cinbadl 2011/07/20 18:46:50
    mae
    ...Don't have to go to china for that...It's here.
  • Vene Vidi 2011/07/20 16:53:46
    I think the foie gras doughnuts are...
    Vene Vidi
    terrible. Foie gras is a speciality and is eaten as a delicates. Eating it with a doughnuts is like putting lipstik on a pig.
    Aside from animal rights problems.
  • Rave 2011/07/20 16:42:33
    I think the foie gras doughnuts are...
    Rave
    +2
    Wouldn't eat it myself, and don't support any form of animal cruelty. Eat all the meat that you like but make sure you know at least remotely where it's coming from, eating the rotting flesh of a tortured, miserable animal is just a put off for me.
  • American_Dream_Lost 2011/07/20 16:16:30 (edited)
    Yes
    American_Dream_Lost
    +1
    Animals were put on Earth to eat, that's what there for. Humans are animals, in case you some how think we aren't, well we are. We have bones and blood just like a wolf, or cow, dog and any other warm or cold blooded animal on the planet.

    An animal would eat you in minutes if it thought it could take you down, and would care less if your family wanted to file a petition because it ate you. These PETA folks are just plain out crazy, I can understand protecting and trying to stop the killing of animals that are on the verge of extinction, but a duck....really? There like everywhere! There as common as pigeons and taste like chicken. The ones they use for this dish are domesticated like chickens and other live stock. Farmers over feed their live stock for the sole purpose of fating them up, the same applies to these ducks.

    I guess the folks at PETA thinks man kind should return to hunter gathers and go out in the woods and hunt with bows and arrows. (I'm sure the food supply for the entire country can be sustained in that manner...maximum sarcasm) I myself would not care to eat a meat donut, now some duck soup or duck jerky, that's reasonable and it doesn't require that the ducks be force fed. That part there seems a bit unnecessary.

    To PETA members: "They taste like chicken man, lets go smoke this grass and save the wales man....whoooo far out, so trippy man"
  • Mom_Im_... America... 2011/07/20 16:56:42
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    It's about suffering, not about potential extinction. In fact, it rationally makes more sense to allow a species to go extinct than to perpetuate it's existence merely to make them suffer for our convenience. According to your logic, it should be okay for us to eat humans, seeing as we're animals who were put here to be eaten and all. I know, I know, that would be evolutionarily stupid, but I'm not so sure your concerned about evolution seeing as you think animals were "put" here. Dumb.
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 17:39:37
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 17:41:20
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 17:49:01
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    What's your point? This poster implies it would have been better for them to do it for the fur, food, or lab testing. It fails at a basic level. I'm not a member of PETA, but peacefully putting a dog to sleep is preferable over any form of physical torture.
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 17:59:55
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 17:44:30
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 17:50:55
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    Have you ever considered that your incessant railing on PETA is just a way to deal with your own cognitive dissonance? If you aren't changing your behavior toward animals then you should be able to see the pointlessness of criticizing them. If you go vegan, then we can talk about PETA's failures, which do exist. But as for now, being a (presumed) meat-eater, you're absurdly shifting the goal post and avoiding an actual discussion. Like a child.
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 18:04:11 (edited)
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 18:32:17
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    Nice try. You will just type incessantly to avoid addressing the question posed in this poll, won't you? Listen to you trying so hard to convince me of your regard for animals when I was originally responding to your comment on how you DO NOT CARE about the suffering a specific animal (ducks). Why should I take you seriously. It's not about me being vegan in and of itself, so I will correct that, it's about me not eating meat that results from animal suffering. Can you say this is true of yourself? If NOT then obviously you have no place criticizing a group that mistreats animals in some way...is this honestly not clear?
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 18:42:05
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 19:30:27 (edited)
  • cinbadl Mom_Im_... 2011/07/20 19:51:59
  • Mom_Im_... cinbadl 2011/07/20 19:56:29
    Mom_Im_an_atheist
    Wow you sure waste a lot of time downloading photos and posting them on here. lol. You must be a lonely old sadist.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/26 08:07:00

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals