Are the UK rioters 'disaffected poor' or just criminals?
FanOreilly
2011/08/12 16:40:43
SLIDESHOW: Profile of a British Rioter
1 of 7
Laura Johnson, 19: she is the daughter of a millionaire and lives in a mansion in Orpington.
Are the UK rioters 'disaffected poor' or just criminals?
Liberal narrative:
The London riots were caused by government austerity measures and the rioters are 'disenfranchised youths' which are victims of greedy rich people denying them 'opportunities'.
The facts:
Rioters are people without a moral opposition to theft, assault, vandalism and anti-social behavior filled with decades of leftist entitlement propaganda, opposition to law and order and enabling of boorish behavior.
*warning profanity*
Are the UK rioters 'disaffected poor' or just criminals?
The London riots were caused by government austerity measures and the rioters are 'disenfranchised youths' which are victims of greedy rich people denying them 'opportunities'.
The facts:
Rioters are people without a moral opposition to theft, assault, vandalism and anti-social behavior filled with decades of leftist entitlement propaganda, opposition to law and order and enabling of boorish behavior.
*warning profanity*
Are the UK rioters 'disaffected poor' or just criminals?
Read More: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2025068/UK...






















Yes I am not a liberal could have told the person above but he blocked me. Funny that he insulted me about something that I wasn't, then blocked me.
All socialist countries including the US have massive debt and high unemployment. The governments are forced to cut welfare programs because they are the cause of massive deficits.
On the other hand, Canada's Conservative government has a 7.2 percent unemployment rate even though they are shedding big government jobs and steadily creating private market jobs, thereby, reducing government spending.
Shoot them and get over it...
'Resentful and rebellious, especially against authority.'
I think people use it wrongly, thinking it means they have been "forgotten" or left out of the process.
These people have "taken themselves out" of the law abiding community, and unless they are shown a strong authority and consequences to their behavior, (like we teach out children) they are on their way to being hardened criminals, not just "juvenile delinquents" as we used to say. This goes way beyond.
The flaw within, is fact that UK PM has begun carrying out these initiatives months ago. There were no uprisings then.
These rioters are lawbreaking scum that are criminal in their behaviour. Probably about 80-90 % of them are on some pensioner programme. The woman photographed above is probably within the minority 10 % of the crowd who happen to think destruction of personal property is fashion chic.
Oops, is that not PC?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/...
It is very apt indeed.
OH WAIT... MY MISTAKE... I thought I was on the thread discussing the behavior of the liberal labor union teachers in Wisconsin..
sorry
if there isn't.
There should be
What civil soceity got working now,
backing up,
thats not working to well
Second, those who did these deeds had no moral compass. They weren't even defensive about what they did. A guy who says, "I guess I was at the end of my rope" is one thing. These people were saying that they had every /right/ to do what they did.
And please tell me where you got the idea that looting, arson, assault and murder equals a public demonstration? Or are you still thinking these crimes occured in the US?