Quantcast

Are the Low Information Democrat Voters starting to wake up?

KCurtis 2013/03/26 21:43:24
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Numerous Senate votes as of late have started to see more and more Bi-Partisan support for Conservative principles. It seems that lately the Democrats are even starting to open their eyes to the troubles in Obamacare that are now starting to plague their constituents.

Monday the Senate voted 79 to 20 (including 33 Democrats) to repeal the Medical Device Tax a huge 29 Billion dollar tax on everything from tongue depressors to nana's hip replacement.

Another solid hit to Obamacare is the release by major public Health Insurance companies who must increase the cost of their coverage by in some cases, 100% to pay for the additional coverage required under the 17000 new regulations.

Harry Reid against his better judgment is bringing Gun Control legislation to the floor. Fortunately for us 2nd Amendment supporters there is no "Assault Rifle" ban or Nation Background check requirements. So it's a Gun Control Bill with no bullets. The only shining light on this is the conservative young guns plan to filibuster the bill on the floor which should serve as some great entertainment in the coming days.

Whilst most Americans have tightened their belts a few more notches to pay for rising gas prices, (not Obama's fault forget the pipeline) done with less food since the price of groceries has risen 58% in the last 4 years (also not Obama's fault forget the regulation increases) but it seems the Obama's are about to embark on yet another vacation. The Obama's average one vacation per month, not counting the recent spring break in the Bahamas.

And Joe Biden spending a million dollars for two nights in Europe while approving in public of 500 million more dollars in foreign aid to Palestinians.

RAVE THIS IF YOU WANT THE LIBERALS TO HEAR THE TRUTH!

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • RTHTGakaRoland 2013/03/26 23:11:54
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    RTHTGakaRoland
    +16
    Theirs is not a problem of ignorance alone. They have a pathological imperative of parasitism.

    obama s parasites

    obama tick

    They can no more be educated away from attaching to and sucking the blood of their fellow Americans than can a tick be educated away from attaching to and sucking the blood of our dogs.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • jon 2014/01/11 08:11:51
    Let's hope so
    jon
    I Know wishful thinking, but it would be a blessing.
  • MsDianna 2013/03/30 00:53:11
    Let's hope so
    MsDianna
    +1
    Oh Praise God! I'm hoping people will open their eyes and see what is happening around them and look for the answers!
  • Soundstorm 2013/03/29 03:16:41
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    Soundstorm
    +1
    Liberals are fleeing bankrupt and costly California like lemmings thanks to the economically illiterate Democrats they've elected. Yet when they resettle in Texas and Colorado they continue to elect those same sort of Democrats that destroyed the economic life of the Golden State. Friedrich Hayek had liberals pegged when he said that they never learn from history.
  • Kurt 2013/03/28 19:24:54
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    Kurt
    +2
    They aren't getting any better. if anything they are getting worse and spreading like cancer.
  • Gooky 2013/03/28 15:43:46
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    Gooky
    +2
    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY....too much.lolol~;-)
  • ☆astac☆~PWCM 2013/03/28 12:38:40
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    +6
    When you look at the proud progressives and those that ride mopeds, you are giving them way too much credit. It seems the die hard obama supporters and cheerleaders do not have the ability to debate the issues, as all they do is lie for obama
  • KCurtis ☆astac☆... 2013/03/28 13:09:42
    KCurtis
    +5
    lolz don't forget che
  • john ri... ☆astac☆... 2013/03/30 01:15:48
    john richardson
    +2
    Ya know we have to watch what we say about Chegay, no peeder, and sore progressive, They might start a poll about how the conservatives are mean and just don't understand that bi sexuality doubles their chances of getting a date.
  • ☆Ed☆ john ri... 2013/03/31 05:44:06
    ☆Ed☆
    +2
    LOL, the truth is, what REALLY "doubles their chances of getting a date" is that ALL of them have the SAME characteristics, "pistol grip ears and fold back teeth"!!!
  • Phyl *In God i Trust* 2013/03/28 04:37:54
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    Phyl *In God i Trust*
  • Brandon Johns 2013/03/28 04:21:27
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    Brandon Johns
    +3
    There is no Democratic party anymore. The Democratic party is now the Communist Party USA.
  • Jimmy D. 2013/03/28 04:14:54 (edited)
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    Jimmy D.
    +1
    What a total load of crap!

    The votes were symbolic on a non resolution budget that will NEVER be passed into law and the only reason these amendments were voted on was to get reps to go along and get the budget passed.

    Obama care has a tax on medical care products because these companies are making billions in profits while totally screwwing Americans.

    these are the companies that charge $25 for a tounge depressor and $600 for a ruber intertube to sit on when you have hemmorhoid surgery.

    The tax should be changed to be a penaly on any unreasonable medical product charges and that is how it will be changed.

    You are also lying about the gun ban and universal background checks and they will be added in as amendments. The Reagan ban was also an amendment to a different bill.

    Grocery prices have not risen 58% in 4 years except on a few products so unless you can provide a link you are nothing but a liar.

    bs meter animated
  • KCurtis Jimmy D. 2013/03/28 11:45:32
    KCurtis
    +1
    Why look here is a low information voter now.
    arrow up
  • GaryO Jimmy D. 2013/03/28 12:03:39
    GaryO
    +1
    Like I said. Republicans rely on misinformation, and most of it they make up on their own.
  • Red Branch 2013/03/28 04:05:37
    Let's hope so
    Red Branch
    +4
    This was supposed the be the other answer.

    Most Libs want the US destroyed as much as if not more than the bamster.
  • GaryO 2013/03/28 04:02:51
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    GaryO
    +1
    Low information Dems are much better informed than misinformation Repubs.
  • Brandon... GaryO 2013/03/28 04:23:32
    Brandon Johns
    +4
    If you want to think so. The fact that you Dems are very misinformed has already been proven.
  • Brandon... Brandon... 2013/03/28 04:23:59
  • Brandon... GaryO 2013/03/28 04:25:02
  • GaryO Brandon... 2013/03/28 12:02:15
    GaryO
    Gosh, I didn't realize that guy was the Democratic spokesman.

    Who hired him?

    Rush Limbaugh?
  • kir 2013/03/28 03:46:33
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    kir
    The fact that the voting masses continue to elect Republicans and Democrats means that they are still for the most part asleep. I think that when people realize that they're being used by the fake two party system, it'll be too late.
  • ☆Ed☆ 2013/03/28 03:30:15
    Let's hope so
    ☆Ed☆
    I believe that they're only now coming to the realization that their miseries are NOT the entire fault of the GOP, and that their messiah has LIED to them steadily!!!
  • Erin 2013/03/28 02:13:17
    Let's hope so
    Erin
    +2
    I find it utterly hypocritical that liberals are now whining about the 2.9% tax on medical devices in Obamacare, simply because it affects "their own." (e.g., Al Franken) So if it looks like a rat, smells like a rat, and tastes like a rat, but it does't affect YOU, then everything's fine, right? NICE, guys!
  • Dogman 2013/03/28 00:40:00
    You're giving them way to much credit KC
    Dogman
    +2
    How silly. Calling Dems "low information voters" is laughable given that Fox viewers are consistently found to be the least informed.
  • ☆Ed☆ Dogman 2013/03/28 03:39:31
    ☆Ed☆
    +2
    LOL, even more "laughable" is how "low information" YOU are on the term "low information"!!!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Low information voters, also known as LIVs or misinformation voters, are people who may vote, but who are generally poorly informed about politics. The phrase is mainly used in the United States, and has become popular since the mid-nineties.

    American pollster and political scientist Samuel Popkin coined the term "low-information" in 1991 when he used the phrase "low-information signaling" in his book The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Low-information signaling referred to cues or heuristics used by voters, in lieu of substantial information, to determine who to vote for. Examples include voters liking Bill Clinton for eating at McDonald's, and perceiving John Kerry and Mitt Romney as elitist for wind-surfing and jet-ski riding respectively.
  • Dogman ☆Ed☆ 2013/03/28 09:28:43
    Dogman
    +1
    Or people who voted for Bush because he went after Saddam for attacking us on 911.
  • ☆Ed☆ Dogman 2013/03/29 06:57:25
    ☆Ed☆
    +1
    Or those that voted for, or against Obama because he's part Black.
  • Dogman ☆Ed☆ 2013/03/29 08:50:24
    Dogman
    +2
    Agreed.
  • Brandon... Dogman 2013/03/28 04:26:06
    Brandon Johns
    +4
    Yes because all Republicans watch Fox News. Unlike you who probably watches MSNBC who's viewers were found to be the second least informed.
  • Dogman Brandon... 2013/03/28 09:29:16
    Dogman
    +1
    Please cite your source.
  • ☆Ed☆ Dogman 2013/03/29 06:58:32
    ☆Ed☆
    +1
    Why should he "cite a source" when YOU haven't???
  • Dogman ☆Ed☆ 2013/03/29 08:49:43
    Dogman
    Because I wasn't asked to. Now that I have been - here you go:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com...

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ne...

    http://www.poynter.org/latest...

    Honestly, I didn't think anyone would question this given that it's such a well known fact. I don't want to rock your little world - but the earth revolves around the sun - do you want me to back that up too?
  • ☆Ed☆ Dogman 2013/03/30 06:24:12
    ☆Ed☆
    +1
    LOL, THREE links to the SAME "STUDY", and, LOL, it's a "study" of 1,185 people nationwide, and they basedtheir decisions off of a 4 and a 5 question survey, YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS?!?

    You cannot possibly believe that that "study" actually "proves" anything!!!
  • Dogman ☆Ed☆ 2013/03/30 10:27:30
    Dogman
    Would you like more? I can give you as many as you'd like. As I said, the fact that Fox viewers are the least informed has been documented many times over.
  • ☆Ed☆ Dogman 2013/03/31 05:46:40
    ☆Ed☆
    +2
    LOL, go ahead!!! And I'll be extremely surprised if you can show ANY links that show a different poll, the imbecilic morons are using the same GARBAGE!!!
  • Dogman ☆Ed☆ 2013/03/31 10:37:55
    Dogman
    Here's one from November, 2011
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/k...

    Here's one that cites six different studies that conclude Fox Viewers are the least informed. This took all of two minutes - do you want more?

    http://www.salon.com/2012/04/...
  • ☆Ed☆ Dogman 2013/04/01 05:02:20
    ☆Ed☆
    LOL, just how MANY lobotomies have you had???

    Your "Forbes" link SPECIFICALLY cites ONE poll, and ONE poll ONLY!!! And, LOL, guess what, it uses the EXACT SAME "study" from Farleigh Dickinson University as ALL of your prior "sources"!!!

    LOL, and then, your "Salon" link is an article written by Chris Mooney, whose greatest achievements are as a "Contributing Editor" for the imbecilic magazine, the "Skeptical Inquirer", and as a Senior Correspondent of the Lobotomized Liberal rag, "The American Prospect", with NEITHER being any more a "credible source" than MAD Magazine!!!

    How about merely showing just ONE CREDIBLE SOURCE!!!
  • Dogman ☆Ed☆ 2013/04/01 22:26:32
    Dogman
    What, exactly, did Mooney write that you disagree with?
  • ☆Ed☆ Dogman 2013/04/02 03:32:51
    ☆Ed☆
    You're kidding, right???

    His ENTIRE article used extreme liberal sources for ALL seven of the polls he referred to for his "facts"!!!

    Not a single one of his sources show even a "moderate" source for verification!!!

    As I previously asked you, "How about merely showing just ONE CREDIBLE SOURCE!!!", and your answer to my question has been to ask why I find fault with the drivel spewed by a leftist loon that only uses extreme leftist propaganda sources as "legitimate" and "viable" sources!!!
  • Dogman ☆Ed☆ 2013/04/02 07:45:02
    Dogman
    Again, please be specific; what, exactly, in the article is untrue? Can you refute even one fact in the article?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/12/19 23:35:40

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals