Just because a
substance is legal, that doesn't mean it's safe. With new substances hitting the market on a regular basis, it's impossible for authorities and experts to keep track of them, meaning there's very little reliable information available. A while back, a handful of teens were hospitalized after taking
synthetic marijuana -- cause enough for concern. But this weekend a 20-year-old man died after taking a substance called Benzo Fury at a Scotland music festival.
David Liddell, director of Scottish Drugs Forum, said in a statement, "Benzo Fury is a so-called legal high -- or New Psychoactive Drug -- which appears to have a similar effect to Ecstasy. It's one of the new legal highs developed to get around the banning of similar compounds ... As it's not been around for long there is little information on long-term effects and as with all these drugs, there's no knowing what's actually in them. The names are just to market them and may bear no relation to what's in them." Do you think these "legal drugs" are just as dangerous as the illegal ones?
People take Pharmaceuticals for what ails them and often to relieve them of pain and suffering and people are not thinking about the intoxicating effects of the substances when they are seeking medical help.
There is a big difference concering "why" people take the pharmaceutical drugs in the first place verses the presently illegal recreational purpose drugs.
In the case of Pharmaceuticals many people really do not know what to do other than consult their doctor and follow the doctors instructions in the belief or hope that the doctor is going to sincerely correct their medical condition.
The side effects are a concern naturally but the people taking the medicines are not taking them to get "stoned on" while the recreational drugs ( intoxicants ) are specifically consumed by people for their intoxicating effects and for recreational enjoyment purposes.
You can argue that the recreational drugs also have medicinal purposes which is absoloutly true as many of the pharmaceutical drugs are derived fr...
People take Pharmaceuticals for what ails them and often to relieve them of pain and suffering and people are not thinking about the intoxicating effects of the substances when they are seeking medical help.
There is a big difference concering "why" people take the pharmaceutical drugs in the first place verses the presently illegal recreational purpose drugs.
In the case of Pharmaceuticals many people really do not know what to do other than consult their doctor and follow the doctors instructions in the belief or hope that the doctor is going to sincerely correct their medical condition.
The side effects are a concern naturally but the people taking the medicines are not taking them to get "stoned on" while the recreational drugs ( intoxicants ) are specifically consumed by people for their intoxicating effects and for recreational enjoyment purposes.
You can argue that the recreational drugs also have medicinal purposes which is absoloutly true as many of the pharmaceutical drugs are derived from the same plant substances that are used for recreational purposes...so there is a conflict of interests concerning people self administering various kinds of beneficial plant substances for medical reasons....but they happen to also be known intoxicants and can be mentally and or physically addicting for many people.
If Marijuana is legalised ( the least harmfull and least detrimental of all the classified narcotics ) there will then become all the more of a conflict of interest concerning the use of the drug for medicinal purposes.The drug will be consumed mainly for recreational purposes more so while many other people are consuming it legally and claiming it is a better medicine than the Pharmaceutical drugs that would be in competition with Marijuana for medicinal purposes.
Although most people know that the intoxicant known as Marijuana is also usefull for medicinal purposes and or health reasons the government is not going to acknowledge the use of the substance until someone or some entities, so to speak , prove to the FDA and other government regulatory agencies the beneficial aspects of its medicinal or health related aspects while also clearly stating its negative aspects....the same way the Pharmaceutical industry is legally obligated to publicly forewarn the citizens about the numerous hazards or potential hazards when consuming such medicinal purpose substances or any by product substances derived from Marijuana.
If Marijuana is to be included as a medicinal product also then it creates its own set of problems because while the government would want to bring it under control as a usefull medicine the available recreational use product, with the same or similar medicinal benefits and or effects, can be legally purchased by way of recreational use purchases.
I would think, eventually, the medicinal aspects of the substance would be separated from the intoxicating aspects of the substance and people could choose to purchase Pharmaceutical grade medical purpose products "derived" from Marijuana ( Hemp) and more than likely most of them would not have the intoxicating effects attached to them by way of science and the ability to seperate and isolate the intoxicating elements from the beneficial medicinal purpose elements.
Meantime people who have a medical problem would be thinking: "Why not just smoke the legally available recreational product and address the medical condition at the same time while also enjoying the intoxicating effects and in effect "self administering" the substance for medicinal purposes...while having fun doing so ...as many people presently do just that.
Some what of a legal conundrum concerning the legal medicinal status of the substance verses the legal recreational use status of the substance.
Doctors kill more people each year than any single disease, heart disease and cancer kill less. Read this! http://l.b5z.net/i/u/14000029...
"11 percent of Americans ages 12 and older now use prescribed antidepressant/psychoticdrugs. (CDC November 2011 report)
At least 106,000 people die each year from drugs which are properly prescribed and properly administered. More than two million suffer serious side effects. (Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN: “Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients.” JAMA 1998;279:1200.
Illegal drugs, including cocaine and heroin, are responsible for an estimated 10,000-20,000 American deaths per year. (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. CDC. 2007;56(05):93-96.)"
"Please note that the statistics in the second point above, 106,000 deaths from legally prescribed drugs, does not even factor in deaths from legal drugs that are not prescribed, but obtained for recreational purposes through theft, through corrupt doctors, or from friends, etc. which is a growing problem."
http://healthimpactnews.com/2...
New York Times:
"Drugs with benzodiazepine, mainly depressants like Valium and Xanax, led to 743 deaths. Alcohol was the most commonly occurring drug, appearing in the bodies of 4,179 of the dead and judged the cause of death of 466 — fewer than cocaine (843) but more than methamphetamine (25) and marijuana (0)."
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/0...
"11 percent of Americans ages 12 and older now use prescribed antidepressant/psychoticdrugs. (CDC November 2011 report)
At least 106,000 people die each year from drugs which are properly prescribed and properly administered. More than two million suffer serious side effects. (Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN: “Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients.” JAMA 1998;279:1200.
Illegal drugs, including cocaine and heroin, are responsible for an estimated 10,000-20,000 American deaths per year. (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. CDC. 2007;56(05):93-96.)"
"Please note that the statistics in the second point above, 106,000 deaths from legally prescribed drugs, does not even factor in deaths from legal drugs that are not prescribed, but obtained for recreational purposes through theft, through corrupt doctors, or from friends, etc. which is a growing problem."
http://healthimpactnews.com/2...
New York Times:
"Drugs with benzodiazepine, mainly depressants like Valium and Xanax, led to 743 deaths. Alcohol was the most commonly occurring drug, appearing in the bodies of 4,179 of the dead and judged the cause of death of 466 — fewer than cocaine (843) but more than methamphetamine (25) and marijuana (0)."
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/0...
There are two of them that would kill me if I took them and
have made 3 trips to the ER because of them.
There are some over the counter medications that can really
do you harm if taking certain prescription drugs.
If there were as many users of the non essential recreational drugs as there are users of the prescription drugs then you would be seeing a whole lot more deaths and various detriments caused by the presently illegal non essential, recreational drugs used and or abused by the citizens at large.
But I would surmize the recreational drugs are not as detrimental as many of the prescription drugs because many of the prescription drug formulas are made from some really nasty chemical toxins and lethal ingredients that can and do kill people.
But yes, everyone agrees that the so called "helpfull" prescription drugs come with all kinds of dangers and liabilities and they are, if anything, just as problematic in many aspects as the presently deemed illegal non essential recreational intoxicants that are available to the citizens.
As I pointed out previously the use and purposes of the drugs has to be acknowledged.
The presently deemed illegal drugs are consumed for the sole purpose of personal recreational intoxication and not for medicinal purposes while the prescription drugs are not manufactured and or sold for the...
If there were as many users of the non essential recreational drugs as there are users of the prescription drugs then you would be seeing a whole lot more deaths and various detriments caused by the presently illegal non essential, recreational drugs used and or abused by the citizens at large.
But I would surmize the recreational drugs are not as detrimental as many of the prescription drugs because many of the prescription drug formulas are made from some really nasty chemical toxins and lethal ingredients that can and do kill people.
But yes, everyone agrees that the so called "helpfull" prescription drugs come with all kinds of dangers and liabilities and they are, if anything, just as problematic in many aspects as the presently deemed illegal non essential recreational intoxicants that are available to the citizens.
As I pointed out previously the use and purposes of the drugs has to be acknowledged.
The presently deemed illegal drugs are consumed for the sole purpose of personal recreational intoxication and not for medicinal purposes while the prescription drugs are not manufactured and or sold for the purpose of recreational intoxication.
There is a fundamental big difference between the uses and purposes of the prescription drugs verses recreational intoxicants consumed solely for the purpose of getting stoned or high or ripped or blitzed out of your mind.
When it comes to the future legalisation of the presently deemed illegal, non essential recreational drugs....be careful what you wish for because when the big, profit orientated mega corporations are given the legal go ahead to manufacture and supply the presently illegal non essential, recreational drugs "legally" then all the more people will be addicted to the recreational purpose drugs...legally.
And they will be legally allowed to sell you a load of prescription drugs that are designed to wean you off the original addictive non essential, recreational drugs that they legally had you addicted to in the first place.
A near perfect business model virtually sustained by all the bonehead druggies that insist on consuming the crap in the first place.
In this case I would surmize the "big, bad government", that everyone likes to lament and criticize is actually protecting you from rampant corporate greed and the sinister agendas of the mega corporations that would love to feed you as much of the legal profit making intoxicating substances as they legally can.
The more the better ...right??
LEGAL DRUGS WERE AS DANGEROUS AS ILLEGAL DRUGS. THE ANSWER AGAIN IS YES!
And this is just the tip of the iceberg...