Apple or PC? What's the Better Computer?
The Big Question
2010/01/26 05:49:50
|
|
|||||
|
89 votes
|
|
50% | |||
|
89 votes
|
|
50% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Gun665 2010/01/26 17:59:57Apple




















In my opinion Apple is more user firendly. And is easy to use with you media and music
You can use it for other things but it doesnt work as good as pc for me
Pc is more usful to me for programing and I like the way its organized alot better
As a side note, my "survey" of techies gave the winning OS to Linux, starting with Ubuntu, as the most stable OS.
It honestly comes down to what you consider constitutes a "better computer."
Hardware-wise, they're pretty even. Apples are pretty durable and built to last. Of course, PCs will vary by manufacturer and model. But, if it's custom built, then it can easily reach or maybe even surpass what Apple has. Of course, that means the prices are nearly even. What Apple could adopt, though, is having two-button mice.
Software-wise, Apple's got the more stable OS. Windows 7 has nifty features, but it's still prone to a few stability issues. Apple also doesn't really need any internet security/anti-virus programs...for now. Of course, on the flip-side, PC's got more choice of programs, but Apple's slowly catching up in that regard.
At this point, it really comes down to what you're using the computers for. For students, it doesn't really matter unless your teachers start requiring you to use certain programs that only works on specific platforms. If you're doing media-based work, such as website creation/hosting, photoshopping, 3D animation, etc, then Apple's just right since it's designed with that in mind. If you're about business/work and gaming, then a Windows computer would be best since most of those programs are currently only available for Windows.
I have this principle, however, that when I pay for something, I expect it to do what I paid for it to do, and I expect to spend significantly more time enjoying my investment than fixing it, or maintaining it.
As far as computers go, I feel that the interface should be user friendly, yet never patronizing, you should not need to be tech savvy to use it, and it should do exactly what you tell it to do, when you tell it to do it, nothing less, nothing more, and if something goes wrong, it should tell you exactly what went wrong, in plain english, not with some code you have to look up in some gigantic database, and it should tell you how to fix it. My mac meets all of these requirements, while none of my PCs met more than one or two of them if that. My mac has lasted me four years, and runs just as fast, and just as smoothly as the day I bought it, I don't have to think about it, which is good, if I had to work to keep my computer running, I would expect to not have to pay for it on top of it all.
Many people expect different things from their computer, however, I think PC is easier to tinker with if you are clever that way, and if you don't mind maintenance and fixing, you can probably mess with the code more easily if you know how.
PC is the only type I've ever had. I have known of people that swear by Apple. I've never had the opportunity to try it, can't afford to buy one "just to see if I like it". You hve to buy the computer to use the operating system, have get only certain operating systems to use the computer, and the PC platform is working for me.
Enough said.
In my experience with both Apple and Intel based systems, most problems are software related, and hardware issues are usually easily resolved.
All that being said, I am (currently) primarily a PC user. However, now that I am gainfully employed again, I do plan on adding a Mac to my home network, primarily for audio and graphics applications.
As for Apple being a pain to fix, they're actually just like any other computer out there, but built tougher. I'm not sure what you mean by "wait a month" when most computer manufacturers take that long. (Dell and Gateway are notorious for taking an average of 2-3 months.) It all depends on the problem and who you have it done by. For example, a Macbook with a failed hard drive, chipped plastic bezels (panels of the case) and a popped key only took a week to have the parts ordered, all parts replaced, laptop tested and sent home with the customer.
You can't really blame problems on a brand unless they've notoriously been called out for it by professionals, such as Dell and Gateway's reputation for saving money by taking working parts from returned computers and installing them into the new computers they're manufacturing. The parts are refurbished, sure, but it's not like they'll tell you about it.
As someone stated here, there is a larger selection of software for PC than a MAC. Steve from Apple should have opened up the Apple lic. to allow clone Apple units this would have then opened up competition between Apple and PC.