Anyone find it odd the Iowa Caucus votes were moved to a "secret location" for counting to dodge a "planned Occupy Iowa Caucus protest"? I never knew tallying little slips of paper could be such a perilous task that it must be done in a hideout.
Indy
2012/01/05 03:57:57
|
|
|||||
|
5 votes
|
|
45% | ||
|
1 vote
|
|
9% | ||
|
1 vote
|
|
9% | ||
|
4 votes
|
|
36% | ||
The result of which are Romney and Santorum both take exactly 25% of the vote plus the 8 single votes Romney edged out. The odds are seemingly astronomical.
Some suggest the real motivation for the "secret" count may have been to be able to funnel enough votes away from Ron Paul who came in right at 21%. What say you?
Some suggest the real motivation for the "secret" count may have been to be able to funnel enough votes away from Ron Paul who came in right at 21%. What say you?
I said from the beginning, Paul isn't going to get the nomination because he's a whack-a-doo on foreign policy.......and please spare me the canned response from the holy book of Paulism, i've heard it all before.......sooooooo many times
and i am dead certain...
that every single neoconprog would agree-
AAARRRGGGHHH... MATEY