Another Global Warming Propaganda Claim Goes Poof?
According to a statement from the American Geophysical Union, announcing the new research:
It turns out that past studies, which were based on computer models without any direct data for comparison or guidance, overestimate the water temperatures and extent of melting beneath the Fimbul Ice Shelf. This has led to the misconception, Hattermann said, that the ice shelf is losing mass at a faster rate than it is gaining mass, leading to an overall loss of mass.
The team’s results show that water temperatures are far lower than computer models predicted. . .
Hatterman and his colleagues, using 12 tons of hot-water drilling equipment, bored three holes more than 200m deep through the Fimbul Shelf, which spans an area roughly twice the size of New Jersey. The location of each hole was cunningly chosen so that the various pathways by which water moves beneath the ice shelf could be observed
Read More: http://weaselzippers.us/2012/06/26/another-global-...
Top Opinion
-
cmdrbnd007 2012/06/27 16:44:35





















http://www.nature.com/nature/...
"We use monthly measurements of time-variable gravity from the GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) satellite gravity mission to determine the ice mass-loss for the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets during the period between April 2002 and February 2009. We find that during this time period the mass loss of the ice sheets is not a constant, but accelerating with time, i.e., that the GRACE observations are better represented by a quadratic trend than by a linear one, implying that the ice sheets contribution to sea level becomes larger with time. In Greenland, the mass loss increased from 137 Gt/yr in 2002–2003 to 286 Gt/yr in 2007–2009, i.e., an acceleration of −30 ± 11 Gt/yr2 in 2002–2009. In Antarctica the mass loss increased from 104 Gt/yr in 2002–2006 to 246 Gt/yr in 2006–2009, i.e., an acceleration of −26 ± 14 Gt/yr2 in 2002–2009. The observed acceleration in ice sheet mass loss helps reconcile GRACE ice mass estimates obtained for different time periods."
http://www.agu.org/pubs/cross...
Pathetic.
Here's another nail in their coffin.
The theory of anthropogenic greenhouse gas forced global warming dates to Fourier in 1824, well before Lovelock was born. Please see:
http://nsdl.org/sites/classic...
Fox News, caught in another lie.
WEATHER models predict TRANSIENT conditions for LOCAL forecasts.
A WEATHER MODEL IS NOT A GLOBAL CLIMATE SIMULATION.
WEATHER models predict TRANSIENT conditions for LOCAL forecasts.
A WEATHER MODEL IS NOT A GLOBAL CLIMATE SIMULATION.