Quantcast

Another Clinton Lies Under Oath

☆astac☆~PWCM 2013/01/25 14:07:36
Did anyone believe a word Hillary Clinton told Congress about the deaths of four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, in Benghazi, Libya, on the night of September 11, 2012? Did anyone believe her about what she knew and when she knew it? Does anyone believe that Republicans laid a glove on her during her testimony? The answers: no, no and no.

The felon and his bride figured out a long time ago that they could tell the nation a whole boatload of whoppers and get away with it. No resigning in shame like Richard Nixon after Watergate. No mea culpa like Ronald Reagan after Iran-Contra. The Clintons were above all that. The agenda came first, last and always. So Bill wagged his bony index finger at the American people and simply lied: “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky, and I never told anybody to lie, not one time.”

He sent Hillary out to tell the dark tale of a vast, rightwing conspiracy to their willing accomplices in the mainstream news media, who ate it up with a spoon. And finally, under oath, Bubba himself gave us the tortured phrase, “It all depends on what the meaning of the word is is.”

Of course, today, Bill Clinton is the rock star senior statesman of the Democratic Party, and Hillary’s little dog and pony show before Congress proves that she is now a seasoned Washington liar who does not like to be challenged.

And why not? It has served her husband and her current boss very well indeed.

Read More: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Donatello 2013/04/06 13:24:37
  • Phyl *In God i Trust* 2013/01/30 03:35:08
    Phyl *In God i Trust*
    +1
    No way I could vote for her. hillary a lar hillary a lar
  • ღ♥ღ ℒea ღ♥ღ 2013/01/27 02:30:50
    ღ♥ღ ℒea ღ♥ღ
    +3
    I agree with all that you wrote. Slimy politicians. Clinton machine is alive and well.
  • MtDuffer 2013/01/27 01:13:57
    MtDuffer
    +2
    What an excellent article from the Canadian Press!
    Well---- what anyone, including die hard Dems could believe all the double gobalygook talk she gave. I don't want to make here health problems any less serious, but what great timing!

    It is a shame that alot of Democrats, some Independents not to mention some Republicans can not and don't want to see the trees in the forest ---- well not until someone want to cut one down.
  • txDON'TMESSw/GOVRickPerry! 2013/01/27 00:57:48
    txDON'TMESSw/GOVRickPerry!
    +1
    Wonder what Chelsea's ambitions are?
  • john ri... txDON'T... 2013/01/27 05:43:50
    john richardson
    +2
    It makes me wonder is she the horndog her ol man is or the iceberg her mom is and what if she's bi polar and both personalitys fight over control of the host body. If he wasn't a democrat I'd feel sorry for Mr.Chelsie Clinton.
  • txDON'T... john ri... 2013/01/27 06:24:05
    txDON'TMESSw/GOVRickPerry!
    +2
    Geez, I never thought about her like that. She has some real demons to fight. Daniel (a member here) posted some pics of the three of them and Chelsea had a necklace of the cross, but it was, are you ready for this?

    It was UPSIDE DOWN! Saw it with my own eyes.
  • Donatello txDON'T... 2013/01/27 21:38:36
  • Thom Payne 2013/01/26 20:14:44
    Thom Payne
    +2
    This should be titled "Another GOPerCONazi Lies...and it is the Author of this Thread"
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/01/27 01:21:08
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    +3
    Another leftist idiot who unblocked me. Hey troll, go play in traffic, come back when you are informed on the issues
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/01/27 20:18:16
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/01/27 20:25:08
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    +1
    You are not informed, in fact you are quite ignorant
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/01/27 20:27:45
    Thom Payne
    +1
    Really? Of what am I not informed? I kicked your ass on the Amendment II, and now I will kick your ass on this moronic thread.

    If you were not ignorant (willfully misinformed), you would realize that you are a fascist enabler and would change your ways. The truth is that you don't even know what a fascist is.
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/01/27 20:29:04
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    Everything
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/01/27 20:43:17
    Thom Payne
    Yes, it is true...you don't have a clue about everything.
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/01/27 23:26:13
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    lol, hi loser
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/01/28 12:06:15
    Thom Payne
    As I said....
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/01/28 14:54:47
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    So says the clueless one.
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/01/29 04:11:43
    Thom Payne
    No....."I" said, not you said.
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/01/29 13:57:54
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    Yes you are clueless.
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/01/29 19:44:46
    Thom Payne
    +1
    One of us is...the other would be me. clueless
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/02/02 15:32:41
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    Yes you are clueless.
  • Donatello ☆astac☆... 2013/04/06 13:23:44
  • txDON'T... Thom Payne 2013/01/27 22:35:16
    txDON'TMESSw/GOVRickPerry!
    +2
    Well Fred, as far as I understand it, the First Amendment is still in force and a Right we, as Americans, have, . . . so far. Quite simply, until that Amendment is struck down and is no longer considered the First Amendment, struck from the Constitution, you are attempting to interfere with HIS right.

    That strike you as fair? Most folks would just bypass the Poll, if they had a problem with its author. Or silently read and go about their business.
  • ☆astac☆... txDON'T... 2013/01/27 23:27:40
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    +1
    he is a typical leftist, he is an ignorant intolerant person.
    He had me blocked, so I wish the clown would just block me again.
  • Thom Payne txDON'T... 2013/01/28 12:07:30
    Thom Payne
    +1
    I guess that I am not 'most folks'. You see, most folks would let this pissant get away with spreading his lies. I don't operate that way.
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/01/28 14:55:16
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    The only pissant around here is you
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/01/29 04:12:24
    Thom Payne
    +1
    LMAO.....said the pissant. Do you really want to get your butt kicked like last time?
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/01/29 13:59:19
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    blah, blah, blah. You ran away last time, remember you could not handle the facts, so you blocked. Now run along, as you are not informed enough to debate the issues
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/01/29 19:46:11
    Thom Payne
    +1
    I didn't run away, I blocked you because you were trolling my thread and disrupting conversations in which you had no part. As you might notice, I just engage you and others who engage me.

    There is no comparison, cowardly fascist.
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/02/02 15:33:18
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    NO, you blocked because I proved you wrong.
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/02/02 16:57:09
    Thom Payne
    +1
    No, I blocked you because you were trolling my thread, being disruptive and annoying to the other posters.

    Wrong cannot prove wrong, cowardly fascist.
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/02/02 17:00:33
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    You are a liar, and look at you trolling my thread. Face it, you are not very informed, so it was quite easy to refute your silly post. You just did not like it. So again, you are only proving that it is you who is the troll
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/02/02 17:04:41
    Thom Payne
    +1
    If I were trolling, I wouldn't be just having a discourse with you, I would be harassing all of the others of your ilk who posted here.

    Of course, I would not expect you to know the difference.
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/02/02 17:06:17
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    But you are trolling. It is sad to see your ignorance on display here
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/02/02 17:15:43
  • txDON'T... Thom Payne 2013/01/28 19:25:22
    txDON'TMESSw/GOVRickPerry!
    +1
    When 'most folks' have a difference of opinion they don't usually resort to name-calling in a civilized society. What's wrong with simply disagreeing and letting it go at that?

    Calling someone a liar is confrontational, adversarial and combative. Just because someone doesn't interpret an issue like you do, does not make them a liar. They just have an opposing viewpoint.

    Why such anger?
  • Thom Payne txDON'T... 2013/01/29 04:14:49
    Thom Payne
    astac is not a person. He is a liar. He is an enemy of the country I love. But he is a sub-human who prefers to languish in the muck of hatred and lies.

    Why such anger? It is because of people like him that we are in the economic state we are in.
  • ☆astac☆... Thom Payne 2013/01/29 13:59:56
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    +1
    No the liar is you. and you are the domestic enemy, you support obama
  • Thom Payne ☆astac☆... 2013/01/29 19:47:38
    Thom Payne
    I don't support a person, I support policies. I am not like you and blindly follow a leader, lemming.

    political lemming
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/09/16 15:37:21

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals