Another Birther Fail: Supreme Court Rejects Latest Frivolous Application From Orly Taitz
For somewhere around the 200th time, a Court has thrown Orly Taitz and her delusional racist birther frivolity out the door. Not that anyone is surprised. President Obama's eligibility to serve as President was verified in the summer of 2008 when he produced certified proof that he was born in Honolulu, proof that was confirmed by the Republican then-Governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle. But try telling that to the crazed Russian Dentist LOL.
Article excerpt follows:
U.S. Supreme Court Denied Without Comment Obama Eligibility Challenge
February 19, 2013
The U.S. Supreme Court in typical fashion denied without comment Dr. Orly Taitz's application for stay for the California electoral challenge Noonan v Bowen. Dr. Taitz sought to strip California's electoral votes from Barack Obama based on his Article II ineligibility, his forged birth certificate, his forged Selective Service, and his Connecticut Social Security Number. Included were Affidavits from DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman and Debt Collector Albert Hendershot attesting to Obama's identity fraud.
12A606 NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court are denied.
Here is a link to the Supreme Court's Official Docket confirming that the application has been denied:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles...
Read More: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/0...
Top Opinion
-
+32I wondered where you numbnuts were and I should have have known it would be a blog defending the half white idiot you call president. Gotta give you guys credit, you can't defend his policies but you're johnny on the spot to defend his eligibility to destroy the country. I'm sure obama can afford the best forgers that can make any document appear legal. Hey, but what the hey, it wouldn't matter to you fools if your hero was the product of a semi constipated camel. Everyone knows you liberals have taste for spit.






















I didn't take you for a racist. Sad to see I was wrong.
This has nothing to do about Race, besides obama is half white, 1/4 arabic, and 1/4 African. He has no black American blood in him at all. That is if you believe who he says he is. If like others say, he is the son of Marshal Davis, well that would change his makeup.
We know more about this man than we know about any public figure in the history of this country. Do you know what Mitt Romney had for dinner when he was eight years old? No? Well you do about President Obama. Do you know where Mitt Romney's mother went to school? No? Well you do about President Obama's mother. Do you know what John McCain's social security number is? No? Well you do about President Obama. Do you even know whether or not Bob Dole has any siblings? No? Well you do about President Obama. What DON'T you know about this President that has the sightest relevance to anything?
And this has EVERYTHING to do with race. People like you still follow the "one drop rule". If someone has one drop of black blood in their ancestry then they are black, no matter that their skin is lighter than snow.
His college records, especially where he took aid reserved for foreign students
So yes, you really do not know anything about him, and this has nothing to do with race
He never received foreign aid. Occidental didn't even OFFER any financial aid for foreign undergraduate students when the President attended. This is YOUR accusation and YOUR burden of proof. So prove it if you can. I guess you don't even realize that the "foreign aid" story was an APRIL FOOLS DAY HOAX that, like the "Friends of Hamas" nonsense that burned the Republicans just this week, never had any substance but simply fit the racist narrative.
You're right that you don't know whether the President got an A or a B in a history class. But as I said, you know everything RELEVANT about this President.
Thank you for confirming your racism. I'm really disappointed to see that that's what it all comes down to. I would not have thought that a Brooklyn boy could be led so far astray.
...birthers are funny.
[PS - Totally off the subject, but I STILL miss John Locke! LOL]
They don't want to get in the middle of the birther debate.
http://tesibria.typepad.com/w...
LOL
1. Can a foreign national be allowed to usurp the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief by virtue of fraud and by using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number
2. Do judges and bureaucrats commit high treason, when they cover up forgery and fraud in IDs of a foreign national Barack Hussein Obama usurping the U.S. Presidency?
3. Does usurpation of the U.S. presidency by a foreign national with forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number means occupation and suspension of the U.S. laws and deprivation of civil rights of the U.S. citizens? If U.S. laws are suspended, which laws are we following?
4. Are US citizens required to follow any U.S. laws, such as paying taxes and risking lives in the military, when the U.S. presidency is usurped by a foreign national with forged IDs and a stolen SSN and high ranking officials and judges are committing treason by covering it up?
5. How do the U.S. citizens know that high ranked judges of the Supreme Court of CA and the Supreme Court of the U.S. actually made any rulings on their cases, or even read one single...
1. Can a foreign national be allowed to usurp the position of the U.S. President and Commander in Chief by virtue of fraud and by using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number
2. Do judges and bureaucrats commit high treason, when they cover up forgery and fraud in IDs of a foreign national Barack Hussein Obama usurping the U.S. Presidency?
3. Does usurpation of the U.S. presidency by a foreign national with forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number means occupation and suspension of the U.S. laws and deprivation of civil rights of the U.S. citizens? If U.S. laws are suspended, which laws are we following?
4. Are US citizens required to follow any U.S. laws, such as paying taxes and risking lives in the military, when the U.S. presidency is usurped by a foreign national with forged IDs and a stolen SSN and high ranking officials and judges are committing treason by covering it up?
5. How do the U.S. citizens know that high ranked judges of the Supreme Court of CA and the Supreme Court of the U.S. actually made any rulings on their cases, or even read one single word of the pleadings, when the clerks and court employees routinely lose documents, manipulate the dockets, misrepresent the rules of the court and type the names of the judges on the rulings, while there are no actual signatures of judges anywhere?
6. Are U.S. citizens justified in revolting against the regime, where the position of the U.S. President and commander in chief is usurped by a foreign national using forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and corrupt and treasonous governmental officials are committing treason and covering it up?
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?...
Here's the Supreme Court Docket:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
As for the $20,000 fine, that came out of a case in Georgia, Rhodes v. McDonald, in which Orly conned a member of the United States Military into suing to question the eligibility of the Commander in Chief. After Rhodes came to her senses and told Orly to drop the case, Orly continued with the case anyway, which was why she was sanctioned. The Supreme Court denied that appeal on July 15, 2010 (and then Orly complained that she wanted proof that Justice Thomas had actually signed the rejection order LOL).
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from a lawyer who has been in the forefront of the challenge to President Barack Obama's citizenship.
The high court on Monday did not comment in refusing to hear the appeal filed by California lawyer and dentist Orly Taitz. She was contesting a $20,000 fine for filing what a federal judge determined was a frivolous lawsuit.
The suit was filed on behalf of Army Capt. Connie Rhodes, who sought to avoid deployment to Iraq by claiming Obama wasn't born in the United States and thus, is ineligible to be president and commander in chief.
By Dr. Conspiracy on February 19, 2013in Orly Taitz, Supreme Court
In a tersely worded decision later today, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision to let stand the California electoral votes for Barack Obama. The Court failed to be persuaded by Taitz’ allegations of stolen social-security numbers and forged Selective Service applications, and they remained unmoved by Taitz’ threats of treason charges against them. The stay requested by Taitz in the case of Noonan v. Bowen was not granted, leaving Barack Obama securely in the position of President of the United States.
The ruling was to let stand California's electoral votes. No indictment of anyone.
As I've already explained to you, the $20,000 sanction was levied in a Georgia case, McDonald v. Rhodes, and Orly's application to the Supreme Court was denied on July 15, 2010.
http://www.nydailynews.com/ne...
Here's the initial story about the fine. It's from 2009.
http://www.politicsdaily.com/...
OY VAY!