Quantcast

Angels Don't Play this HAARP

Always Right 2012/08/09 16:50:33
Even the technocratic European parliament found serious concerns about HAARP. A 1999 European parliament committee report, after hearing Dr. Nick Begich and others, concluded:
[the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection] Regards the US military ionospheric manipulation system, HAARP, based in Alaska, which is only a part of the development and deployment of electromagnetic weaponry for both external and internal security use, as an example of the most serious emerging military threat to the global environment and human health, as it seeks to interfere with the highly sensitive and energetic section of the biosphere for military purposes, while all of its consequences are not clear, and calls on the Commission, Council and the Member States to press the US Government, Russia and any other state involved in such activities to cease them, leading to a global convention against such weaponry;
I speculate that HAARP, when and if used for nefarious purposes (such as weather modification in co-operation with chemtrails), is remotely operated from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory and/or Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. During my humble investigation, I found that these three locations have produced much of the leading research and development. HAARP is an incredibly high-tech machine. You need highly skilled scientists and engineers to run the thing. The best place to run HAARP would be from a laboratory where the technology was developed. Also, most people (top scientists included) are generally not so hot about relocating to the wilds of Alaska. As noted earlier, HAARP can be remotely operated.

We know HAARP can modify the weather. If one could, don't you think they would? Weather control is god-like power. Chemtrails may be sprayed to enhance the effectiveness of these operations. If this is the case, our government's pattern of lying and obfuscation about HAARP makes perfect sense and is consistent with behavior exhibited by others associated with every aspect of chemtrails, geoengineering and the related activities I outline.

Read More: http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/smoking-gun-ha...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • LibertyCaroline 2012/08/09 19:21:06
  • Always ... Liberty... 2012/08/10 11:09:03
    Always Right
    +1
    Excellent video! Thanks for sharing.
  • ConLibFraud 2012/08/09 19:18:35
  • BritPunk 2012/08/09 17:11:12
    BritPunk
    Great article. The USA really should pay more attention to the experts in the European Parliament.
  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/08/09 17:04:34
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +1
    "Chemtrails" sound like someone's misinterpretation of common ordinary vapor trails, that any jet plane makes.

    This HAARP system comes up every now and again. Now I would imagine that they hesitate to use it to manipulate the weather, because they know it would have an unintended consequence, and they haven't figured out how they would explain a thing like that.
  • Sport_G... Temlako... 2012/08/09 17:23:39
    Sport_Geoff
    +2
    Interesting points about HARP. The one piece of information that isn't published about HARP (if it is I can't find it) is when have they cranked this thing up? Might be interesting to see a timeline comparing dates and times it was cranked up to natural disasters such as massive tornado outbreaks.

    Japan had a nuclear meltdown (March 2011) which raised concerns about radiation in the atmosphere reaching the west coast. In April 2011 the largest and deadliest tornado outbreak in history is recorded in the U.S.

    Did they crank up HAARP prior to the tsunami that hit Japan?...who knows.

    Did they crank up HARP trying to alter the course of the upper level radiation flow away from the east coast?......who knows

    Could HAARP effect weather patterns to cause tornado's?......probably

    Without information on HAARP testing and usage that would include detailed specifics there is no way of knowing and they damn sure aren't going to tell.
  • gary Sport_G... 2012/08/09 17:47:09
  • gary Temlako... 2012/08/09 17:45:01
  • ConLibF... Temlako... 2012/08/09 19:16:22
    ConLibFraud
    You are very wrong about chemtrails.
  • Temlako... ConLibF... 2012/08/09 21:22:21
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +1
    How so? Do you think the Air Force has enough planes for the kind of spraying you're talking about? Do you suspect every contrail you see of being a chemtrail?
  • ConLibF... Temlako... 2012/08/09 21:26:36
    ConLibFraud
    Please be careful with your words. There are contrails and there are chemtrails. Big difference. It appears that you are not paying attention.
  • Temlako... ConLibF... 2012/08/09 21:27:18
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +1
    You need to tell the group how to distinguish between the two. No one has.
  • ConLibF... Temlako... 2012/08/09 21:51:20
    ConLibFraud
    It's not rocket science. All you have to do is fricken look up!

    Contrails dissipate. Chemtrails stay in the sky and slowly spread out taking on the appearance of clouds.

    I have seen - witnessed - a blue sky day as forecast - let me repeat - ZERO clouds in the forecast! Then the planes start putting lines in the sky that slowly spread and in about 1 hour a beautiful blue sky was turned into a hazy day.

    If you are not witnessing this stuff then you have your head in the dirt.
  • Temlako... ConLibF... 2012/08/10 01:17:22
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +1
    Guess what: that's a distinction without a difference.
  • ConLibF... Temlako... 2012/08/10 02:43:41
    ConLibFraud
    +1
    Because of people like you, they are getting away with it.
  • Mr. T 2012/08/09 17:01:32
    Mr. T
    +2
    That is a very interesting read. A LOT of research was put into that...read it years ago and recommend others do as well.

News & Politics

2013/05/19 23:26:21

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals