Quantcast

An Open Letter to Dr. Ron Paul

KCurtis 2012/06/11 23:53:12
Dear Dr. Paul,
I am just a mother and a grandmother who so loves this country and the concept of freedom that stands faithfully behind our lovely United States Constitution. While I respect your views, I also see that you have collected a vast and deep following of people over the course of your admirable career. But, I must ask you now to consider the path you have chosen and the priorities of it. I must ask that you define for those followers, what is the best path for the greater good of us, the American people. I have been involved in politics at a local level since the 1970’s. I have served on a public level, but rarely delved into the national level until 2008. Today with little experience, I run a PAC, a political action committee under the blanket of the independent grass roots movement of the Tea Party. I’ve been an independent voter for over 42 years over 10 election cycles voting for both Democrats and Republicans who hold a fiscal and Constitutional conservative ideology. Now I realize something critical to both the path and direction of this great country, I must chose a side that stands clearly against the progressive movement toward a foundation that squarely stands on the opposite side of Socialism, Marxism, Fascism and eventually Communism, and that stance falls on the Republican Party. While a presidency held by Governor Romney is not as conservative as I like, I recognize for the good of all of the US people; Mr. Romney is the only opportunity we have to continue to live under the Constitution I swore a pledge of allegiance to for the better part of my entire life. So I ask you, plain and simple, transparent, from the bottom of my heart to do the same. The people who follow you have clearly stood for the Constitution, but unfortunately they also blindly follow your direction and some are willing to follow that dedication to the end of the freedom. They as well as all Americans need your direction now. They need to be told you are no longer seeking the office of the President of the United States and they need to be given your choice of endorsement. Without this, all of what you have stood for will soon fall to the ashes of the end of this great nation, the end of a free people. Ronald Regan once said freedom was the last stand in the United States and here we are, at the end of the road. Those of us who never stood with either party now realize that another 4 years of a leftist, progressive presidency will end all that we have stood for, for the last 240 years. It’s time Dr. Paul, it’s time for you, like I, to make your choice.



You have no possible way to win your honorable fight. You have given your all and those on either side have lost, but we as Americans have lost the most. While I understand your attempts and respect your positions now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country; this includes you Dr. Paul. We need to be united so that we will live to vote another day. I urge you to come forward, admit your campaign is over and make an endorsement so that those people who blindly follow can make their choice. And if you have any bit of concern over the future of the US Constitution I ask that you give us a start to turn the paradigm back, to move the road toward a better, more conservative America and endorse Mitt Romney. While he is not the most conservative person to guide this nation through the extremely hard times, he is the most conservative candidate who can win and stop the liberal progressive regression of this country and move forward with the founding principles that we have always, and will hopefully always stand for.



Very best regards,

KCurtis, National Chairwoman
Tea Party PAC of USA

Read More: http://www.teapartypac.org/2012/06/11/an-open-lett...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Dan ☮ R... KCurtis 2012/06/14 14:38:29
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +2
    He's the father of Romneycare, Funded Planned Parenthood, 100% defends Obama on the NDAA, drone strikes, killing Americans and so on.
  • Yo'Adri... RageFury 2012/06/13 23:55:39
    Yo'Adrienne..AFCL
    +2
    BINGO>>>>>>...
  • KCurtis Grounds... 2012/06/13 22:29:34
    KCurtis
    Thanks for putting your country ahead of your ideology. This is the last stand.
  • Yo'Adri... Grounds... 2012/06/13 23:55:10
    Yo'Adrienne..AFCL
    +1
    BOOM...You rock!
  • Farnsworth 2012/06/13 13:13:02 (edited)
    Farnsworth
    +2
    THANK YOU.....

    nail on the head


    bulls eye
  • KCurtis Farnsworth 2012/06/13 22:30:21
    KCurtis
    No, thank you!
  • Farnsworth KCurtis 2012/06/14 01:16:19
    Farnsworth
    +1
    eloquently put, sums it up perfectly.

    I just don't get the Paulbots.
  • KCurtis Farnsworth 2012/06/14 01:44:34
    KCurtis
    +1
    They'd bite off their nose to spite their face.
  • TheNightFly 2012/06/13 12:40:13 (edited)
    TheNightFly
    +2
    In other words, Romney's going to lose if all he has is the support of the far right side of the Republican party.

    But Obama will win again by only a tiny plurality of voters because most Americans are too fed up with the constant dichotomy of monopolism vs socialism to even bother to vote. Not to mention elections fraud and cronyism in the electoral college.
  • KCurtis TheNigh... 2012/06/13 22:30:54
    KCurtis
    Yes, next question.
  • Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮ 2012/06/13 12:35:18
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +10
    We do not blindly follow Ron Paul. You honestly honestly think we'll listen when your post is so full of blatant insults? You really think we are sheep that will follow Paul if he betrays us? At least 90% of Rand Pauls supporters that got him elected have already disowned him. If Paul betrayed us, we'd do the same to him.

    This movement spearheaded by Paul is not about one man or getting one man in office. Its about an idea we call liberty represented by the constitution. Both Obama and Willard and their puppet masters are a detriment to that cause, and will be opposed till the end.
  • KCurtis Dan ☮ R... 2012/06/13 22:31:35
    KCurtis
    Yes you do.
    Yes I hope you will for the best of the Country and the continuation of the US Constitution you claim to love.
  • Dan ☮ R... KCurtis 2012/06/14 02:20:38 (edited)
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    You dont listen to a damn word anyone says to you do you? That's probably why you think Romney would attack the fed when in reality he defends it and says it must remain an independent agency.

    If you love the constitution, then stop supporting anti-constitutionalist candidates.
  • KCurtis Dan ☮ R... 2012/06/14 10:56:54
    KCurtis
    Romney supports auditing the FED. He's already said it.
  • Dan ☮ R... KCurtis 2012/06/14 12:59:09
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    No Rand Paul lied and said Romney would audit the fed. Romney has stated he wants the fed as an independent agency, multiple times said he'd re-nominate Bernanke, and says he doesnt want.

    I've already showed you videos, but here is another one.


    He wants to protect the fed.
  • Dan ☮ R... KCurtis 2012/06/14 14:41:45 (edited)
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    Actually, I have a challenge for you. Show me one video clip of Romney saying congress should audit the fed. Just 1.
  • WGN 2012/06/13 11:55:50
    WGN
    +10
    No rave for you.
    Mitt Romney is far from the person to lead this country. He is just more of the same Bush style conservative whoose inept economic policies got us into this mess. Why in hell would anyone want more of that?
  • KCurtis WGN 2012/06/13 22:32:56
    KCurtis
    Not asking for raves and based on our last exchange talk to the hand... or go find someone who actually gives a $hit what you think.
  • WGN KCurtis 2012/06/13 23:21:42
    WGN
    +1
    I know that you don't really think, just spout the inane TP rhetoric. If you want to look at something that is really historical, go look at the TP'ers of the late 1800's, they were called the "populists" and they spouted the same crap that you spout today except for one thing- their group was not an offshoot of a big business (the KOCH Brothers) sponsored think tank.
    If the TP had its way, just who would benefit? It wouldn't be the wage earners or the small business man. It would be big business. FOLLOW THE MONEY.
  • KCurtis WGN 2012/06/14 00:03:40
    KCurtis
    Whose the liberals offshoot? Soros a former Nazi and Communism supporter. I'm happy with my choice.
  • WGN KCurtis 2012/06/14 11:53:05
    WGN
    +1
    My comment srtill stands and your post reinforces the point that you follow and don't really think at all.
  • mk, Smartass Oracle 2012/06/13 11:04:30
    mk, Smartass Oracle
    +3
    Nicely stated, but Ron Paul is a man of deep conviction. He has started a movement that will continue long after he's gone.
  • Carson 2012/06/13 05:31:17
    Carson
    +8
    DR.Paul will up hold the constitution all right and the declaration of independance. Good old Willard is not the answer to Americas problems. Dr Paul is.
  • Dodgerfan 2012/06/13 05:01:50
    Dodgerfan
    +8
    This comes directly from K Curtis profile at teapartypac.org.:
    My Heroes

    Sarah Palin
    Rush Limbaugh
    Glenn Beck
    Sean Hannity
    Ronald Reagan

    I quit listening to Rush Limbaugh years ago when I realized he did not give opposite views fair time to give their points. He is an original RINO neo-con.

    While very pretty, Sarah Palin is not suited for a local office much less VP.

    Glenn Beck-Cry me a river!

    Sean Hannity-Fox! And that is enough about him.

    Ronald Reagan-The only plausible hero listed and he did some shady things he wasn't proud of.
  • KCurtis Dodgerfan 2012/06/13 10:34:58
    KCurtis
    +3
    That was clear as mud wtf is your point?
  • Dodgerfan KCurtis 2012/06/13 12:28:19
    Dodgerfan
    +3
    With heroes like that you have been brainwashed so much your brain would look like a ragged pair of blue jeans. These are not people to emulate but to be shunned for their ignorance and grandstanding.
  • KCurtis Dodgerfan 2012/06/13 22:33:23
    KCurtis
    +1
    Ad hominem gets no response.
  • Dodgerfan KCurtis 2012/06/13 12:29:22
    Dodgerfan
    +2
    Also, "wtf" sounds so nice coming from a mother and grandmother. They must be very proud of you.
  • KCurtis Dodgerfan 2012/06/13 22:33:49
    KCurtis
    +1
    They are, they love their country. My son served in the Armed Forces.
  • Dodgerfan KCurtis 2012/06/14 02:47:55
    Dodgerfan
    So, do you use that language around them? For someone representing a national PAC you don't seem worthy of the position and know very little about the people in charge of the country. Politicians in both parties are paid by the same people to do their bidding.

    So your son was in the armed forces. So what? Did he serve in combat on the ground with bullets flying and booby traps and roadside bombs all around? If he did that was his choice as there is no conscription at this time. Whether you would admit it or not more armed forces personnel have given to the Ron Paul candidacy than all the others combined. There has to be a reason for that. Maybe it's because they recognize the futility and the waste of taxpayer money in the desert.

    There is no need in my wasting time here as you are blinded to reality and at present there is no two party system. Not until the Republican Party returns to its roots will we have someone to vote into the White House. As things stand now the neo-cons have a choke hold on the party but The Campaign for Liberty is on the move and things are starting to change. Millions have now seen the light and know the MSM has conspired with the corporate and banking industries to keep things as they are. I just hope it isn't too late for my Grand-Children to grow up in an America with the freedoms that I had.
  • KCurtis Dodgerfan 2012/06/14 10:59:12
    KCurtis
    So now you are saying only people who served in combat deserve to be called patriotic. You are a moron and your logic is as twisted a progressive loons.
  • Dan ☮ R... Dodgerfan 2012/06/13 12:42:07 (edited)
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +3
    Reagan was a wonderful man before he became president. He use to attack the NWO, and Bush for his former connections to globalists. Forcing Ronald to take Bush as his running mate, shooting at him several times, and tricking him onto a low cholesterol diet and drugging him with statins certainly shut this hero up.

    Palin, while formerly an independent woman sold out for a few pretty dresses.
    Beck is well known for stealing other people's info and twisting it. As Brietbart said, he's a liar, thief and a coward (I dont always agree with him, but Brietbart seemed like a much more honest man than most - and that's why he had to die.)
    Hannity and Limbaugh - Anyone that can defend Abu Garaib and not want to kill themselves is scum.
  • KCurtis Dan ☮ R... 2012/06/13 22:34:41
  • Dan ☮ R... KCurtis 2012/06/14 02:22:58
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    She's now supporting those good old boys if you havent noticed.
  • KCurtis Dan ☮ R... 2012/06/14 11:00:11
    KCurtis
    No she is not if you had bothered to look into what she has been doing. Some of the candidates she endorsed are not the mainstream GOP.
  • Dan ☮ R... KCurtis 2012/06/14 13:01:18
    Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    Yeah, that lists contains neocons like Rubio and West. Power tripping bastards that love the NDAA and Cispa. That is totally not "establishment".
  • Philthy Dodgerfan 2012/06/13 20:03:42
    Philthy
    +3
    She is the sheep - does she even realize that Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity are on Bain Capitals payroll (Romney payroll) - what a misguided lady...
  • KCurtis Philthy 2012/06/13 23:19:02
    KCurtis
    I hate to break it to you but all of them are highly successful and don't need anything from Bain Capital.
  • Brian Tristan MacQuillan 2012/06/13 05:00:50
    Brian Tristan MacQuillan
    +2
    Well written, and to the point. Bravo!

    My only contention with the "endorse someone Ron Paul" thing is this...
    a candidate can continue to run, or if they suspend their campaign wrangle for their positions in the party's platform. Ron Paul is no different, and being that he is to libertarian positions in a way Goldwater was to conservative positions, I see it as fair and honest for him to go to the convention, and stand up for his positions. At the convention, since he is one of the candidates in the primary elections, I would expect him to throw his support behind the nominee. He does not have to of course, but typically that is what the other candidates do do. So anyhow, my point is, there is time, and there is not need to rush the matter.

    Having read a few of Ron Paul's books, an having watched and listened to interviews with him, I respect him a great deal, and believe he is a patriot. I am a conservative, and not a libertarian, in fact I think I am a paleoconservative, so I do have disagreements with the Doctor on several issues. Regardless, I welcome a wide variety of thought under the GOP tent, as the debate on the right, by the right, I find stimulating, and healthy. As one could imagine, I do not have much time for chicken hawks, and bonafide RINOs, both of ...



    Well written, and to the point. Bravo!

    My only contention with the "endorse someone Ron Paul" thing is this...
    a candidate can continue to run, or if they suspend their campaign wrangle for their positions in the party's platform. Ron Paul is no different, and being that he is to libertarian positions in a way Goldwater was to conservative positions, I see it as fair and honest for him to go to the convention, and stand up for his positions. At the convention, since he is one of the candidates in the primary elections, I would expect him to throw his support behind the nominee. He does not have to of course, but typically that is what the other candidates do do. So anyhow, my point is, there is time, and there is not need to rush the matter.

    Having read a few of Ron Paul's books, an having watched and listened to interviews with him, I respect him a great deal, and believe he is a patriot. I am a conservative, and not a libertarian, in fact I think I am a paleoconservative, so I do have disagreements with the Doctor on several issues. Regardless, I welcome a wide variety of thought under the GOP tent, as the debate on the right, by the right, I find stimulating, and healthy. As one could imagine, I do not have much time for chicken hawks, and bonafide RINOs, both of which Dr. Paul is no fan of, but from a more libertarian point of view.

    I believe Dr. Paul's unwavering support for the Constitution, and his strict constructionist interpretations of that document, in the face of a possible second term for an Obama Administration leaves very few choices for him as to who to endorse. Sure, he could endorse a third party candidate like the Libertarian Party's ticket, but he ran as a GOP candidate this time to get his libertarian ideas into the GOP, and to become part of the mainstream conversation of the party. Certainly the Tea Party subscribes to many of the ideas Dr. Paul has championed over the years, and some of those people are registered to vote as Republicans. I do believe Dr. Paul will endorse the candidate who has the best chance of defeating Obama in November.

    A second term for an Obama Administration is just about a guaranteed end for conservative, libertarian, or even blue dog Democrat participation in our federal government probably forever, or at least for our lifetimes. That is a pretty fine point to put on the situation, but if you analyze it, it is absolutely true. Dr. Paul is well aware of that, and is well aware that the Supreme Court can have up to three justices appointed by the next president, and is well aware that the Second Amendment (the first domino that must fall in a reconstruction of the Constitution) is in peril under a second Obama Administration. He will make his endorsement in his own time, and it will happen at the convention.
    (more)
  • Dodgerfan Brian T... 2012/06/13 12:26:00
    Dodgerfan
    +3
    I do not agree. An endorsement for Romney would be the death of Campaign for Liberty and what Dr. Paul has worked for tirelessly for all his political life. Romney is a warmonger just like the rest of the neo cons and he can not be trusted. His campaign is funded primarily by Goldman-Sachs and I would not touch them with a ten foot pole.

    Your patronizing remarks may sound nice but they are hollow when said in the same breathe with, "vote for Romney or else". If Obamney is elected you can stick a fork in the US cause we are done.

News & Politics

2013/05/25 16:02:09

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals