An Open Letter to Dr. Ron Paul
KCurtis
2012/06/11 23:53:12
Dear Dr. Paul,
I am just a mother and a grandmother who so loves this country and the concept of freedom that stands faithfully behind our lovely United States Constitution. While I respect your views, I also see that you have collected a vast and deep following of people over the course of your admirable career. But, I must ask you now to consider the path you have chosen and the priorities of it. I must ask that you define for those followers, what is the best path for the greater good of us, the American people. I have been involved in politics at a local level since the 1970’s. I have served on a public level, but rarely delved into the national level until 2008. Today with little experience, I run a PAC, a political action committee under the blanket of the independent grass roots movement of the Tea Party. I’ve been an independent voter for over 42 years over 10 election cycles voting for both Democrats and Republicans who hold a fiscal and Constitutional conservative ideology. Now I realize something critical to both the path and direction of this great country, I must chose a side that stands clearly against the progressive movement toward a foundation that squarely stands on the opposite side of Socialism, Marxism, Fascism and eventually Communism, and that stance falls on the Republican Party. While a presidency held by Governor Romney is not as conservative as I like, I recognize for the good of all of the US people; Mr. Romney is the only opportunity we have to continue to live under the Constitution I swore a pledge of allegiance to for the better part of my entire life. So I ask you, plain and simple, transparent, from the bottom of my heart to do the same. The people who follow you have clearly stood for the Constitution, but unfortunately they also blindly follow your direction and some are willing to follow that dedication to the end of the freedom. They as well as all Americans need your direction now. They need to be told you are no longer seeking the office of the President of the United States and they need to be given your choice of endorsement. Without this, all of what you have stood for will soon fall to the ashes of the end of this great nation, the end of a free people. Ronald Regan once said freedom was the last stand in the United States and here we are, at the end of the road. Those of us who never stood with either party now realize that another 4 years of a leftist, progressive presidency will end all that we have stood for, for the last 240 years. It’s time Dr. Paul, it’s time for you, like I, to make your choice.
You have no possible way to win your honorable fight. You have given your all and those on either side have lost, but we as Americans have lost the most. While I understand your attempts and respect your positions now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country; this includes you Dr. Paul. We need to be united so that we will live to vote another day. I urge you to come forward, admit your campaign is over and make an endorsement so that those people who blindly follow can make their choice. And if you have any bit of concern over the future of the US Constitution I ask that you give us a start to turn the paradigm back, to move the road toward a better, more conservative America and endorse Mitt Romney. While he is not the most conservative person to guide this nation through the extremely hard times, he is the most conservative candidate who can win and stop the liberal progressive regression of this country and move forward with the founding principles that we have always, and will hopefully always stand for.
Very best regards,
KCurtis, National Chairwoman
Tea Party PAC of USA
I am just a mother and a grandmother who so loves this country and the concept of freedom that stands faithfully behind our lovely United States Constitution. While I respect your views, I also see that you have collected a vast and deep following of people over the course of your admirable career. But, I must ask you now to consider the path you have chosen and the priorities of it. I must ask that you define for those followers, what is the best path for the greater good of us, the American people. I have been involved in politics at a local level since the 1970’s. I have served on a public level, but rarely delved into the national level until 2008. Today with little experience, I run a PAC, a political action committee under the blanket of the independent grass roots movement of the Tea Party. I’ve been an independent voter for over 42 years over 10 election cycles voting for both Democrats and Republicans who hold a fiscal and Constitutional conservative ideology. Now I realize something critical to both the path and direction of this great country, I must chose a side that stands clearly against the progressive movement toward a foundation that squarely stands on the opposite side of Socialism, Marxism, Fascism and eventually Communism, and that stance falls on the Republican Party. While a presidency held by Governor Romney is not as conservative as I like, I recognize for the good of all of the US people; Mr. Romney is the only opportunity we have to continue to live under the Constitution I swore a pledge of allegiance to for the better part of my entire life. So I ask you, plain and simple, transparent, from the bottom of my heart to do the same. The people who follow you have clearly stood for the Constitution, but unfortunately they also blindly follow your direction and some are willing to follow that dedication to the end of the freedom. They as well as all Americans need your direction now. They need to be told you are no longer seeking the office of the President of the United States and they need to be given your choice of endorsement. Without this, all of what you have stood for will soon fall to the ashes of the end of this great nation, the end of a free people. Ronald Regan once said freedom was the last stand in the United States and here we are, at the end of the road. Those of us who never stood with either party now realize that another 4 years of a leftist, progressive presidency will end all that we have stood for, for the last 240 years. It’s time Dr. Paul, it’s time for you, like I, to make your choice.
You have no possible way to win your honorable fight. You have given your all and those on either side have lost, but we as Americans have lost the most. While I understand your attempts and respect your positions now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country; this includes you Dr. Paul. We need to be united so that we will live to vote another day. I urge you to come forward, admit your campaign is over and make an endorsement so that those people who blindly follow can make their choice. And if you have any bit of concern over the future of the US Constitution I ask that you give us a start to turn the paradigm back, to move the road toward a better, more conservative America and endorse Mitt Romney. While he is not the most conservative person to guide this nation through the extremely hard times, he is the most conservative candidate who can win and stop the liberal progressive regression of this country and move forward with the founding principles that we have always, and will hopefully always stand for.
Very best regards,
KCurtis, National Chairwoman
Tea Party PAC of USA
Read More: http://www.teapartypac.org/2012/06/11/an-open-lett...
Top Opinion
-
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/06/11 23:54:37
+30You know that not everybody here will agree with what you have written. But you say it well.
Exactly what do I not know what I'm talking about? You want to bring up a specific?
just about everything your TRYING to sell me here ,,,
how do you think the major mortgage corps , go into trouble ,,,and had to have a BAIL OUT ...because they cooked the books ,, the financial insts did the same thing ...then when they did their "stress tests " they failed ,,cause they couldnt back the numbers with cash & incomming funds !
MY former boss a CPA ..showed me how the crash happened ..who was involved & who was at fault .....I'm not stupid ,,and your attempting to portray me to be ,,,,
now humor YOURSELF ,,and look at gerald CELENTE "trends research inst .
and his predictions for the economy since 1984 ...and YOU MINGHT BE ABLE TO FIGURE OUT WHERE YOUR WRONG !
Are you talking about the jobs growth crash of January 2008? Are you talking about the GDP crash of December 2007? Are you talking about the stock market crash of November 2007? Are you talking about the Mortgage Backed Securities crash of June 2007? Are you talking about the real estate crash of July 2006? What crash do you speak of? I am very curious what your CPA boss showed you or told you. Can you share that with me? By the way, CPA's (nor CMA's for that matter) are economists. . . they are double entry-bookeepers and their auditors. . . Don't glorify them (us). . .
I think you will eventually get back to private label mortgage backed securities and unregulated private label mortgage loans ("liar loans"). When you get here you will NOT get to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the Community Reinvestment Act. You will get back to the Garn-St. Germain Act of 1982 that allows adjustable rate lending by banks/thrifts, mortgages to be sold interstate from one private bank to another in order to create private label mortgage backed securities, that allowed banks to lower their reserve levels by more than half of pre-Garn-St. Germain reserve requirement levels. You will also get to a time of rising federal funds rates by the Federal Reserve which ignite th...&
Are you talking about the jobs growth crash of January 2008? Are you talking about the GDP crash of December 2007? Are you talking about the stock market crash of November 2007? Are you talking about the Mortgage Backed Securities crash of June 2007? Are you talking about the real estate crash of July 2006? What crash do you speak of? I am very curious what your CPA boss showed you or told you. Can you share that with me? By the way, CPA's (nor CMA's for that matter) are economists. . . they are double entry-bookeepers and their auditors. . . Don't glorify them (us). . .
I think you will eventually get back to private label mortgage backed securities and unregulated private label mortgage loans ("liar loans"). When you get here you will NOT get to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the Community Reinvestment Act. You will get back to the Garn-St. Germain Act of 1982 that allows adjustable rate lending by banks/thrifts, mortgages to be sold interstate from one private bank to another in order to create private label mortgage backed securities, that allowed banks to lower their reserve levels by more than half of pre-Garn-St. Germain reserve requirement levels. You will also get to a time of rising federal funds rates by the Federal Reserve which ignite the fuel (adjustable rate mortgage loans) Garn-St. Germain amasses. You will discover that not only the Savings & Loan Crisis of 1986-1990 followed Garn-St. Germain, but the Credit Crunch of 2007-2009 followed Garn-St. Germain. And, by the way, Dodd/Frank, nor even the Volcker rule (not yet in effect until 2014 but which would have prevented JP Morgan Chase's recent $2 billion to $5 billion speculation losses), corrects the deregulation of Garn-St. Germain that openned Pandora's box in the first place. If the US economy ever recovers enough to grow, real estate will rise in value again and risky, non-Freddie and non-Fannie applicant adjustable rate private label mortgage loans will be buried in private mortgage-backed securities again. When the fed raises interest, then a match will be struck for a third real estate crises. . .
means the books can be "rearanged " to look a specific way .....numbers / reciepts / and account info. cooked ......!
lets no be stupid here ....I am not !
same as enron // JB morgan ...and the rest do it ,,,,,either your a total idiot or your in on it ....!?
this govt does this all the time ...as does the major corps ...
Explain to me which budget you are talking about and which part of the budget was "rearranged". The only phony budget creation I am aware of was the Bush Jr. policy of trickling the total budget over to Congress and the press in parts so the total deficit was not stated at once. Like the Omnibus spending bill for 2009 added to the Iraq/Afghanistan War budget for 2009 added to the Disaster Relief budget for 2009 added to TARP. Each of these required a vote before the public that a negative vote against would have resulted in accusations of nonpatriotism or noncompassion to the Congressmen who would have voted against them for fiscal conservatism reasons. The Obama administration started reforming the budget process by presenting it in one total Omnibus Spending bill instead of playing political games with the American people.
ONE MORE TIME, AND SLOW ENOUGH FOR YOU AND YOUR CPA BOSS TO UNDERSTAND. . .
The federal budget is a bi-partisan creation of Democratic and Republican officials. This is a natural check on collusion and, hence, falsification of the books. Who would want to falsify what actually results, anyway? Do you think anyone is "proud" of this work? Major corps do not have an accountability like this since most Boards rubber stamp the work of the CEO. There is a helluva difference between corporate accountabiity (equity ownership) and government accountability (reeelection).
Keep smoking! Maybe we can get back the other 3.5 million jobs lost in Bush's Great Recession. Maybe we can have another 11 straight quarters of rising GDP. Maybe we can add al Zawahiri to Osama bin Laden and 19 other key al Qaeda and Taliban leaders that have been found and killed since we stopped stationing a 150,000 man distraction in the Baathist state of Iraq, and really went after the terrorists who killed 3,000 of our citizens in 2001. . . Maybe we can add Chrysler and AIG to the other 20 US corporations returned form US Treasury ownership to capitalism. . . If what's in that bong is responsible for turning the US around on a dime to save it from the wreckage of the previous 8 years, keep on smoking!!!
As a freedom lover, and an Oath Keeper, the weight of my decision as to wither or not to continue fighting for Dr. Paul and my Constitution is great.
I am almost to the conclusion that any meaningful change can not be effected on the "national" stage.
I can not compete with trillions of dollars from the Federal Reserve/Goldmen Sachs.
This is a time of testing, a moment that will decide if we can look ourselves in the mirror or even sleep at night.
I pray a lot, these days.
http://youtu.be/9RTSZH2xDV4
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency tensions and economic or financial crisis.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to...
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency tensions and economic or financial crisis.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
Can you back this???????????
"I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Obama for a 2nd term so be it"
LOOK A GERALD CELENTE ""TRENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE " for 2012 / 13 's course for the economy // political ////
“We stand to send nearly 200 bound delegates to the Republican National Convention in Tampa…What’s more, we will send several hundred additional supporters to Tampa who, while bound to Romney, believe in our ideas of liberty, constitutional government, and a common-sense foreign policy. When it is all said and done, we will likely have as many as 500 supporters as delegates on the Convention floor.
And while this total is not enough to win the nomination, it puts us in a tremendous position to grow our movement and shape the future of the GOP!”
Some of Paul’s supporters dispute that any of the RNC delegates are bound to vote for any candidate, citing Republican Party Rule No. 38. Obviously, Ron Paul doesn’t see it that way.
However, one thing everyone acknowledges is that no delegate to the RNC is bound to any candidate’s position on the issues. That means Paul’s 500 delegates can vote any way they want regarding the Republican Party platform.
That might not so...
“We stand to send nearly 200 bound delegates to the Republican National Convention in Tampa…What’s more, we will send several hundred additional supporters to Tampa who, while bound to Romney, believe in our ideas of liberty, constitutional government, and a common-sense foreign policy. When it is all said and done, we will likely have as many as 500 supporters as delegates on the Convention floor.
And while this total is not enough to win the nomination, it puts us in a tremendous position to grow our movement and shape the future of the GOP!”
Some of Paul’s supporters dispute that any of the RNC delegates are bound to vote for any candidate, citing Republican Party Rule No. 38. Obviously, Ron Paul doesn’t see it that way.
However, one thing everyone acknowledges is that no delegate to the RNC is bound to any candidate’s position on the issues. That means Paul’s 500 delegates can vote any way they want regarding the Republican Party platform.
That might not sound exciting, but consider the implications. The nominee is expected to adopt the platform as his own, or at least not take a position that directly contradicts it. Romney’s positions are diametrically opposed to Paul’s on a range of issues. What if the Ron Paul delegates get one or more of Paul’s positions into the platform? . .
I will share your post.
We see a lot of Republicans paying lip service to the goal of smaller government (including Romney) but you can bet everything you (still) have, that it will get only bigger under both rulers!
just a question ?