Quantcast

All these Executive Order that were executed by Ovomit, can it be repeal or is this a temporary thing? If it can't be repeal, are we required to live with all his executive order impose on us forever? Just being curious...

Pete 2012/05/17 19:22:00
Related Topics: Repeal, US, Executed, Live
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • shadow76 2012/05/18 13:09:10
    Comment if you wish.....
    shadow76
    +1
    Never has any previous President illegally sent troops to any country without Congressional approval like Lybia. Never has.a President had one of his Dept implement a law that was voted down in Congress. His executive orders ate mostly done in secret. Never has one presumed to lecture the Supreme Court,
    an equal branch of Govt.
  • kiwimac 2012/05/18 03:42:49
    Comment if you wish.....
    kiwimac
    1. Your level of disrespect to the President is simply appalling.
    2. ALL modern presidents have issued Executive Orders, you should try using Google sometime.
  • Pete kiwimac 2012/05/18 13:25:38
    Pete
    LOL! you're really a clown. I couldn't help myself laughing at your comment......... PBWY
  • DM Twin 2012/05/17 23:18:46
    Comment if you wish.....
    DM Twin
    +2
    ANYTHING Obutthole set on as an executive order... can be recinded immediatley once the Republicans take the Presidency .
  • Pete DM Twin 2012/05/17 23:20:31
    Pete
    +1
    I hope you're right..... PBWY
  • AM 2012/05/17 23:15:30
  • Denny 2012/05/17 22:22:30
    Comment if you wish.....
    Denny
    Executive orders are gone over whenever there is a new president.
  • The Electrician 2012/05/17 22:03:21
    Comment if you wish.....
    The Electrician
    What E.O. are you referring too ?
  • Pete The Ele... 2012/05/17 22:09:31
    Pete
    +1
    The Martial Law................. PBWY
  • The Ele... Pete 2012/05/17 22:20:00
    The Electrician
    What Martial Law ? You're definitely "Paranoid Delusional."
  • Pete The Ele... 2012/05/17 22:59:44
    Pete
    +2
    I guess you don't read much do you?...No I am not "Paranoid Delusional". I live with reality and the truth, you my friend live in hide out or under a rock. Hope you get the time to read this.. PBWY



    OBAMA AUTHORIZES HIMSELF TO DECLARE MARTIAL LAW
    Commentary
    The Washington Times by: Jeffrey T. Kuhner Thursday, March 22, 2012



    Read more: http://times247.com/articles/...

    President Obama has given himself the powers to declare martial law — especially in the event of a war with Iran. It is a sweeping power grab that should worry every American.

    On March 16, the White House released an executive order, “National Defense Resources Preparedness.” The document is stunning in its audacity and a flagrant violation of the Constitution. It states that, in case of a war or national emergency, the federal government has the authority to take over almost every aspect of American society. Food, livestock, farming equipment, manufacturing, industry, energy, transportation, hospitals, health care facilities, water resources, defense and construction — all of it could fall under the full control of Mr. Obama. The order empowers the president to dispense these vast resources as he sees fit during a national crisis.

    “The United States must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting natio...


















    I guess you don't read much do you?...No I am not "Paranoid Delusional". I live with reality and the truth, you my friend live in hide out or under a rock. Hope you get the time to read this.. PBWY



    OBAMA AUTHORIZES HIMSELF TO DECLARE MARTIAL LAW
    Commentary
    The Washington Times by: Jeffrey T. Kuhner Thursday, March 22, 2012



    Read more: http://times247.com/articles/...

    President Obama has given himself the powers to declare martial law — especially in the event of a war with Iran. It is a sweeping power grab that should worry every American.

    On March 16, the White House released an executive order, “National Defense Resources Preparedness.” The document is stunning in its audacity and a flagrant violation of the Constitution. It states that, in case of a war or national emergency, the federal government has the authority to take over almost every aspect of American society. Food, livestock, farming equipment, manufacturing, industry, energy, transportation, hospitals, health care facilities, water resources, defense and construction — all of it could fall under the full control of Mr. Obama. The order empowers the president to dispense these vast resources as he sees fit during a national crisis.

    “The United States must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting national defense requirements and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its national defense equipment in peacetime and in times of national emergency,” the order says. “The domestic industrial and technological base is the foundation for national defense preparedness. The authorities provided in the act shall be used to strengthen this base and to ensure it is capable of responding to the national defense needs of the United States.”

    In short, the order gives Mr. Obama the ability to impose martial law. He now possesses the potential powers of a dictator. The order is a direct assault on individual liberties, private property rights and the rule of law. It is blatantly unconstitutional. The executive branch is arrogating responsibilities precluded by the Constitution without even asking the permission of Congress. The order gives Mr. Obama a blank check to erect a centralized authoritarian state. This is a law one would expect to find in Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela or Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

    The backdrop to the executive order is the looming showdown with Iran. The administration says the “window for diplomacy is closing.” Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta warned Tehran’s mullahs that “all options are on the table” — including military intervention. Mr. Obama stresses that his patience is running out. He vows that Iran will not acquire the bomb. Mr. Obama wants several more months for sanctions and international isolation to bring the ayatollahs to heel. Yet the signals are clear: Mr. Obama may be ready to launch devastating airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

    If that should happen, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has promised massive retaliation. American troops will be targeted by Iranian proxies in Iraq and Afghanistan. American embassies will be struck across the Middle East and North Africa. Most ominously, Iranian-backed Hezbollah cells could launch devastating terrorist attacks in major U.S. cities, killing numerous citizens. The war may well come home, triggering domestic chaos. These are the very real risks of a major conflict with Iran.

    Which begs the question: Would that tempt Mr. Obama to claim a state of emergency and thereby implement his executive order? No one knows the answer. And we shouldn’t have to find out. The president does not — and should not - have the authority to subordinate the entire private economy to the government, especially without the consent of Congress and the American people. It is national socialism masquerading as military security.

    This is why conservatives — those who are serious about defending our constitutional republic - should demand that the executive order be repealed immediately. Liberals argue that President Clinton issued a nearly identical mandate. President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the first national defense resources preparedness order, which has been amended by successive presidents, including George W. Bush. Hence, according to the progressive left, if it was good enough for FDR, Mr. Clinton and Mr. Bush, why not Mr. Obama?

    The answer is simple: Because the Constitution matters — or at least it should. For more than 70 years, liberal Democrats and corporatist Republicans have been slowly dismantling the old republic, imposing a creeping social democracy. The Founding Fathers’ vision of limited government and federalism has been replaced by a new ruling class. FDR, Mr. Clinton, Mr. Bush — all of them were militarists expanding the size and scope of government. They were Wilsonian globalists, and they shamelessly violated civil liberties. FDR was the worst, by forcing Japanese-Americans into internment camps.

    Mr. Obama’s executive order represents the culmination of the welfare-warfare state. He is walking in the footsteps of his predecessors, those who enabled the rise of the imperial presidency. And it leads to only one tragic end: the gradual deterioration of our democracy.

    Jeffrey T. Kuhner is a columnist at The Washington Times and president of the Edmund Burke Institute.


    Read more: http://times247.com/articles/...
    (more)
  • The Ele... Pete 2012/05/18 03:44:42
  • Pete The Ele... 2012/05/18 11:42:18
    Pete
    I don't believe you know what's common sense and what isn't. Can't win an argument can't you? Always looking for that crack to get out. Don't you?. BTW, The Washington Times have been around long before you were thought off and they will be here long after your bone become dust. I believe you are the one who's out of touch with reality. It is you who need to get a life and get your head out of that sand dune. Nothing will convince you because you've been brainwash and so brainless to know any better. Oh well. who can you blame? ...................... PBWY
  • ray 2012/05/17 21:54:25
    Comment if you wish.....
    ray
    EO's are Executive instructions to Department heads . Assorted Department then issue regulations which carry the force of law. Congress or Courts can nullify any regulation, having them act responsibly is problematic . EO's exist only at the pleasure of the President. By the End of January , how many will still exist will be determined by the New President.
  • Andy 2012/05/17 21:41:30
    Comment if you wish.....
    Andy
    While legal... not necessarily the best for the nation!!
  • ordman 2012/05/17 19:37:36
    Comment if you wish.....
    ordman
    +2
    They can be rescinded by the any President at ant time.
  • ProudProgressive 2012/05/17 19:30:52
    Comment if you wish.....
    ProudProgressive
    +1
    Executive Orders are a legitimate exercise of the power of the Executive Branch, and cannot be repealted. In some cases an Executive Order could be overridden by legislation, but in others they are a matter of Presidential discretion. A subsequent President can alter or revoke a prior Executive Order. If an Executive Order conflicts with the Constitution then it can be struck down by the Courts. Fortunately, none of President Obama's Executive Orders conflict with the Constitution in any way.

    And what exactly has been "imposed on you" anyway?
  • Pete ProudPr... 2012/05/17 20:41:07
    Pete
    +1
    Obamafia authorizes himself to declare martial law. P-resident Obamafia has given himself the powers to declare martial law — This Executive Order he signed to declare "Martial Law" will eventually have control and power over every American who refuses to comply with his own laws. This really bother me... .................... PBWY
  • kiwimac Pete 2012/05/18 03:44:05
    kiwimac
    +1
    As did other presidents before him. You do realise that in the event of such an emergency you cannot wait for Congress to be in session?
  • shadow76 kiwimac 2012/05/18 13:13:20
    shadow76
    There are measures they already had in place to cover that. He did not need new executive order, unless he is planing an emergency!
  • BigFig#9 2012/05/17 19:26:24
    Comment if you wish.....
    BigFig#9
    +1
    EOs are by their nature repealable by EO... So what are the EOs that you find particularly damaging or otherwise egregious or have you simply heard there are 'bad' things in EOs and want to vent about the someone being in office that you may not agree with as a result of a democratic process?

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/11/24 04:07:03

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals