All 31 states who voted on same sex marriage voting down same sex marriage, let's move on to the next question. Should a Bi-Sexual Woman be allowed to marry a man and a woman together? (or vice versa)

by CAPISCE Posted 2012/08/12 14:04:45

Related Topics: Sexual, Sex, Let's Move, Hell, Same Sex, Bi, Same Sex Marriage, Marriage, Business, Voting

Read More

48 votes
Read all 181 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	It's nobody's business	14 votes	29%
	Hell NO	34 votes	71%

+10

Add a comment above

Schläue~© 2012/08/12 14:27:14

Hell NO

+5
I don't give a flying fickle finger of fate what people want to bang in the confines of their own privacy, including goats, vacuum hoses or champagne bottles but don't try to hijack marriage and try to adapt others traditions to fit your perversions.
>> See Replies

More polls by CAPISCE

bettyboop 2012/08/19 16:14:39

Hell NO

+1
If same sex marriage is voted out, I feel sure tri-sex marriage will be also.

reply
CAPISCE to bettyboop 2012/08/19 17:54:53

+1
Nailed it---as well as incestuous marriage of adults, Bigamy, Group marriage etc etc

reply
diane RN 2012/08/17 03:16:24

It's nobody's business

+1
I dont want to hear about it, do what you want behind closed doors but dont try to shove it down my throat and get me to agree with you. Where will the line be drawn....transgenders, pedophiles, bestiality...Dont they have rights also?

reply
Buzzymuzzwelle 2012/08/15 04:19:15

Hell NO

+1
I have no problem with civil unions but leave marriage alone for God's sake. Oh sorry Jay1 I forgot. Buzzy

reply
Sayer Stewart 2012/08/14 18:15:13

It's nobody's business

No reason not to.

reply
jcadla 2012/08/14 04:05:12
CAPISCE to jcadla 2012/08/14 19:08:21

+1
Really?--read the comments .

reply
ZB 2012/08/14 02:09:26

It's nobody's business

+1
Although polygamy is illegal in the US, which is kinda stupid.

reply
Boo 2012/08/13 20:07:49

Hell NO

+1
That would be polygamy, and it's illegal.

reply
Lawnmowerman~PWCM~JLA 2012/08/13 05:03:40

Hell NO

+3
...that's polygamy and that IS illegal.

reply
Scream 2012/08/13 01:36:26

It's nobody's business

Though, that's not what bisexuality is...

reply
cc 2012/08/12 23:53:07

Hell NO

+1
I think that our government should only recognize one spouse for tax and benefits purposes. After that, it's nobody's business if they want to be "married" to however or whomever. The other marriages could be legally recognized for purely legal reasons such as hospital visitation, 1st, 2nd, 3rd in line for recieving death benefits, etc. People need liberty. Let's make it so.

reply
laydeelapis 2012/08/12 23:05:19

It's nobody's business

Yeah, why not? My only rule concerning relationships is that if all parties involved are okay with it and no one is harmed in the process, let them be happy. It doesn't affect me or anyone else so why should I try to sabatoge other peoples' happiness?

reply
CAPISCE to laydeel... 2012/08/12 23:13:00

+3
Incestuous marriage of adults? Group marriage? Bigamy?

reply
laydeel... to CAPISCE 2012/08/12 23:22:41

What?! In what way is this incestuous? Pretty sure two of the people involved have to be related in order for that to be the case, hun.

reply
CAPISCE to laydeel... 2012/08/12 23:24:49
laydeel... to CAPISCE 2012/08/12 23:36:59

You know what, it's weird to me but again, it's not my place to judge. If they're consenting and not harming anyone and careful enough that they WON'T wind up pregnant, then it's really not my business. They can do what they like and it won't affect me and how I live my life. I wouldn't do it personally because (aside from cousins) the idea repulses me but if it doesn't do that to others, why should I care?

reply
CAPISCE to laydeel... 2012/08/12 23:42:37

+2
OK --at least you are not a hypocrite.
I totally disagree but that's fine--I have a feeling you are young and will have a totally different take on the issue as you live some--time will tell

reply
laydeel... to CAPISCE 2012/08/12 23:44:00

+1
No, I'm not. I doubt that. Age doesn't make people less accepting.

reply
Red Branch to laydeel... 2012/08/13 00:14:12

+2
It is called common sense and has nothing to do with accepting depravity and degeneracy.
If you are so accepting, how can you be repulsed by doing your brother, unless you have already tried it.

reply
laydeel... to Red Branch 2012/08/13 00:18:50

It has nothing to do with me. I said I was repulsed by the IDEA of that. I accept that others may not be and if they want to, I'm not going to be in their bedroom telling them what to do.

reply
Red Branch to laydeel... 2012/08/16 01:10:26

+2
Certain things are right and certain things are wrong.

"All it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing".
Edmund Burke

reply
laydeel... to Red Branch 2012/08/16 04:57:42

+1
And where do we draw the line between what's right and what's wrong? There's no way to get everybody to agree on that type of thing.

reply
Red Branch to laydeel... 2012/08/16 14:53:53

+1
You are advocating for a culture in which there are no restrictions on anyones behavior.
You are calling for absolute anarchy.

Why?

reply
laydeel... to Red Branch 2012/08/17 03:04:36

I'm calling for acceptance of different lifestyles. If we all did that, there wouldn't be anarchy. Peace might have a chance.

reply
Red Branch to laydeel... 2012/08/17 03:10:42

Allowing same sex marriage will not prevent any wars.

reply
laydeel... to Red Branch 2012/08/17 06:01:27

Nor will it create any. Ball's back in your court :)

reply
Red Branch to laydeel... 2012/08/17 14:58:22

+1
The ball did not make it to my court.

You were the one who said "Peace might have a chance".

reply
laydeel... to Red Branch 2012/08/17 21:42:27

Yes, and? You're saying that allowing same sex marriage will create wars?

reply
Red Branch to laydeel... 2012/08/17 21:47:03

+1
I didn't say that. You, not me introduced that whole line of thought into this discussion.

reply
laydeel... to Red Branch 2012/08/18 04:21:50

"You are calling for absolute anarchy."
^So you didn't say that?

reply
Red Branch to laydeel... 2012/08/19 05:01:59

I did say that, but we had been talking about wars.

reply
laydeel... to Red Branch 2012/08/21 06:59:14

Then what was your last reply about? You said that I introduced the line of thought into the discussion.

reply
CAPISCE to laydeel... 2012/08/13 00:18:07

+2
All of us thought we knew everything in our teens---then we find out we knew practically nothing

reply
laydeel... to CAPISCE 2012/08/13 00:25:40

I don't claim to know everything. And we're not arguing fact here. This is all opininated belief. And my belief is that it's fine and even if it's something I wouldn't do myself, I won't get in the way of others.

reply
CAPISCE to laydeel... 2012/08/13 22:15:13

Good answer-----for a teen-----lol

reply
laydeel... to CAPISCE 2012/08/14 04:39:50

+1
Good answer, period. Asterisks aren't necessary. :)

reply
Red Branch to laydeel... 2012/08/13 00:11:53

+1
You quick, I should have known that nothing would get by you.
There are those disgusting degenerate and depraved people who would marry their siblings, father/daughter or mother/son to keep the bloodlines pure, or aunt/nephew or uncle/neice for the pure bloodlines like the ancient Egyptian pharaohs (whole royal family).

reply
laydeel... to Red Branch 2012/08/13 00:21:50

Yeah, I know that's what the ancients did and I get why they did it but they also ended up with whole dynasties with the same genetic problems as a result. Again, as long as they're careful not to get pregnant and risk a child being born with physical/mental problem, I don't see why their personal life is anyone else's affair.

reply
Red Branch to CAPISCE 2012/08/13 00:06:40

+1
Animals and children are the next target for the perverts in the Left.

reply