Romney is ahead in Missouri by at least 7 points in many polls ... and I seriously doubt this one particular incident, as regrettable as it is, is going to significantly change that. Especially in an election that will be predominantly about jobs.
In today's 24-hour news cycles, a lot will happen between now and early November that will push this whole Akin thing off the radar.
The liberals' attempts to score political points from this will not succeed. Is what Akin said any more despicable than what Biden said about Republicans wanting to re-enslave black people?
I don't think so. It was an atrocious accusation, and it was much worse than what Akin said.
Akin was just being stupid, and he's apologized for what he said. Biden was being absolutely hateful, and he hasn't apologized at all. Let's remember that, everyone.
Akin's Rape Remark Draws Tea Party Pressure: Will Akin's Comment Cost Romney Missouri's Electoral Votes?
Fef
2012/08/22 20:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
274 votes
|
|
45% | |||
|
338 votes
|
|
55% | |||
Mainstream media has dog-piled on senatorial candidate Congressman Todd Akin (R-MO) for his comment about "legitimate rape." Akin has apologized for his comment, but the media will not let it pass, which has caused many Republicans and Tea Party members to put pressure on Akin to drop out of the race.
Some polls suggest that Akin's comment may adversely affect Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney in Missouri. Voters may show up to vote against Akin and Republicans may not show up to vote for Akin. Both of these actions could increase the votes for Obama and give Missouri's electoral votes to Obama.
"I've really made a couple of serious mistakes here that were just wrong, and I need to apologize for those," Akin said. Do you think Akin's comments will give Missouri's electoral votes to Obama -- and hurt Romney in the process?
ABCNEWS.GO.COM reports:

Some polls suggest that Akin's comment may adversely affect Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney in Missouri. Voters may show up to vote against Akin and Republicans may not show up to vote for Akin. Both of these actions could increase the votes for Obama and give Missouri's electoral votes to Obama.
"I've really made a couple of serious mistakes here that were just wrong, and I need to apologize for those," Akin said. Do you think Akin's comments will give Missouri's electoral votes to Obama -- and hurt Romney in the process?
ABCNEWS.GO.COM reports:
Pressure mounted on Rep.Todd Akin to quit his Missouri Senate race today despite his repeated refusals to step down over his incendiary comments about rape.

Read More: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/akins-rape-rem...
Top Opinion
-
JenSemPa 2012/08/22 06:09:13






















Welcome by the way! This is a bumpy road on here to say the least, and its going to get bumpier. lol
The media is desperate to find things on Republican politicians and are left to grabbing for straws as the Democrat policies have not turned out to be the hope and change promised almost 4 years ago.
How long will the "blame Bush" defense hold water? Piling on Aiken is a desperation move; hoping to get the electoral votes via the media.
.
The dems, can ALWAYS blow up something not important, while ignoring the real issues. Ecomomy, Jobs, unemployment, military, deficit.
Yes, what one man said, wrongly, about rape will make your bank account bigger, right?
Ironic. one RWNJ writes a book and you treat it like the Fifth Gospel, but 10,000 Scientist claim there is Global Warming and you put your hands over your ears and go on to Babble, and say it is a Threoy
And something even more shocking is that a rapist has parental rights in most states, which would mean that a victim could be tied to her rapist for eighteen years, shuttling the child to and from his residence in a joint custody agreement.
http://www.legalvoice.org/foc...
.
I would have to read that Bill myself, before I believe anything liberal/dem says on here. I have learned, a long time ago, if it is a dem, it is SPUN, facts left out, or outright lies.
Are there THAT MANY RAPES in this country?
You asked, "Are there THAT MANY RAPES in this country?" According to a 2011 article I read, in a survey, one in five women experienced rape or attempted rape at some point in their lives. They may not have all reported the rapes.
You should read this article below. There's a link at the end.
Raped, pregnant and ordeal not over
Chicago, Illinois (CNN) -- When I was in law school, my criminal law professor introduced us to the crime of rape by reading us a quote from Lord Chief Justice Sir Matthew Hale, a 17th-century English jurist: "In a rape case it is the victim, not the defendant, who is on trial."
It was not merely a history lesson. I had lived it.
While a student in my final year of college, at age 21, I was raped. I have dissected that moment -- the horrifying moment that I became a "victim" -- from every possible angle. I have poked and prodded, examined and re-examined. Regrettably, I have even suspected myself in a desperate, ultimately futile attempt to understand how I became a victim.
But blaming myself was neither my idea nor my first inclination. I thought such 17th-century notions were long dead. I was wrong. Peopl...
You asked, "Are there THAT MANY RAPES in this country?" According to a 2011 article I read, in a survey, one in five women experienced rape or attempted rape at some point in their lives. They may not have all reported the rapes.
You should read this article below. There's a link at the end.
Raped, pregnant and ordeal not over
Chicago, Illinois (CNN) -- When I was in law school, my criminal law professor introduced us to the crime of rape by reading us a quote from Lord Chief Justice Sir Matthew Hale, a 17th-century English jurist: "In a rape case it is the victim, not the defendant, who is on trial."
It was not merely a history lesson. I had lived it.
While a student in my final year of college, at age 21, I was raped. I have dissected that moment -- the horrifying moment that I became a "victim" -- from every possible angle. I have poked and prodded, examined and re-examined. Regrettably, I have even suspected myself in a desperate, ultimately futile attempt to understand how I became a victim.
But blaming myself was neither my idea nor my first inclination. I thought such 17th-century notions were long dead. I was wrong. People who did not even know me were quick to comment or speculate on my rape. What were you wearing? Did you scream loudly? Did this occur in public?
As my history lesson said, I found myself on trial, facing the most fierce judge and jury: ignorance.
Eight years after my rape, I find myself on trial against ignorance again. Rep. Todd Akin's recent comments that "legitimate rape" rarely results in pregnancy not only flout scientific fact but, for me, cut deeper. Akin has de-legitimized my rape.
You see, nine months after my rape, I gave birth to a beautiful little girl. You could say she was conceived in rape; she was. But she is also so much more than her beginnings. I blissfully believed that after I finally had decided to give birth to and to raise my daughter, life would be all roses and endless days at the playground. I was wrong again.
It would not be long before I would learn firsthand that in the vast majority of states -- 31 -- men who father through rape are able to assert the same custody and visitation rights to their children that other fathers enjoy. When no law prohibits a rapist from exercising these rights, a woman may feel forced to bargain away her legal rights to a criminal trial in exchange for the rapist dropping the bid to have access to her child.
When faced with the choice between a lifetime tethered to her rapist or meaningful legal redress, the answer may be easy, but it is not painless. For the sake of her child, the woman will sacrifice her need to see her once immensely powerful perpetrator humbled by the court.
I know it because I lived it. I went to law school to learn how to stop it.
Having fought this injustice for the past several years, I have come to believe that ignorance is to blame for this legal absence. Opponents argue no woman would ever choose to raise the child she conceived through rape. The only two studies to analyze the choices made by pregnant raped women indicate otherwise -- at least 30% of women who conceive by rape make this choice.
Others argue that no rapist would ever seek parental rights. Not only does my experience and that of others I know prove otherwise, but it is not surprising that a man who cruelly degrades a woman would also seek to torture her in an even more agonizing way, by seeking access to her child.
Today, it seems we may face a new and unbelievable challenge: convincing legislators that women can conceive when they are raped.
Make no mistake, my efforts and the efforts of others to persuade legislators to pass laws restricting the parental rights of men who father through rape will be directly impacted by Akin's recent comments. Whether these efforts will be helped or hurt, however, depends upon us as a society.
Either we will fight ignorance and take steps to legislate for raped women based upon reason and facts, or we will be led by ignorance and continue to make bad laws. Or fail to make good ones.
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/0...
If Romney were president, I'm sure he would not stand in the way if Congress attempted to strip women of their reproductive health rights.