Quantcast

Akin's Rape Remark Draws Tea Party Pressure: Will Akin's Comment Cost Romney Missouri's Electoral Votes?

Fef 2012/08/22 20:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Mainstream media has dog-piled on senatorial candidate Congressman Todd Akin (R-MO) for his comment about "legitimate rape." Akin has apologized for his comment, but the media will not let it pass, which has caused many Republicans and Tea Party members to put pressure on Akin to drop out of the race.

Some polls suggest that Akin's comment may adversely affect Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney in Missouri. Voters may show up to vote against Akin and Republicans may not show up to vote for Akin. Both of these actions could increase the votes for Obama and give Missouri's electoral votes to Obama.

"I've really made a couple of serious mistakes here that were just wrong, and I need to apologize for those," Akin said. Do you think Akin's comments will give Missouri's electoral votes to Obama -- and hurt Romney in the process?

ABCNEWS.GO.COM reports:
Pressure mounted on Rep.Todd Akin to quit his Missouri Senate race today despite his repeated refusals to step down over his incendiary comments about rape.
quit missouri senate race repeated refusals step incendiary comments rape

Read More: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/akins-rape-rem...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • JenSemPa 2012/08/22 06:09:13
    No
    JenSemPa
    +17
    Romney is ahead in Missouri by at least 7 points in many polls ... and I seriously doubt this one particular incident, as regrettable as it is, is going to significantly change that. Especially in an election that will be predominantly about jobs.

    In today's 24-hour news cycles, a lot will happen between now and early November that will push this whole Akin thing off the radar.

    The liberals' attempts to score political points from this will not succeed. Is what Akin said any more despicable than what Biden said about Republicans wanting to re-enslave black people?

    I don't think so. It was an atrocious accusation, and it was much worse than what Akin said.

    Akin was just being stupid, and he's apologized for what he said. Biden was being absolutely hateful, and he hasn't apologized at all. Let's remember that, everyone.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Scrappyang Sissy 2012/08/24 22:37:48
    Scrappyang
    +1
    Non-story?!?!?!? May I assume you agree with him? Perhaps not, but your remark makes it seem so.
  • Sissy Scrappyang 2012/08/25 12:27:25
    Sissy
    +1
    Agree with who? Sorry, but you lost me. If you're saying that I agree with Akin that there is only "legitimate rape", then I guess you don't know me very well. If you're agreeing that this is a non-story then you don't know American women any better.
  • Scrappyang Sissy 2012/08/25 12:46:00
    Scrappyang
    +1
    I'm sorry for theconfussion. I am still new to this site. I was answering a comment Jackie made to me.
  • Sissy Scrappyang 2012/08/25 12:56:01
    Sissy
    +1
    That's okay. One of the biggest "aggravations" on this site is that comments get tossed to and fro.

    Welcome by the way! This is a bumpy road on here to say the least, and its going to get bumpier. lol

    Welcome to our group
  • Robin B Sissy 2012/08/25 22:28:46
    Robin B
    +1
    So you agree with the extreme views of Obama. He voted 3 times as a Senator to deny medical care to a baby who survived an abortion. Don't take my word for it look it up.
  • Sissy Robin B 2012/08/26 10:51:39
    Sissy
    It is much more complicated than what you state here. Obama's objection to legislation proposed when he was a state senator and which was used unsuccessfully against him by Alan Keyes during their campaign, centered on the fact that the Ill law was not the same as the federal law which Bush had signed and would have opened the door to an assault on Roe vs. Wade. Obama stated that he would have supported the state law if it had the same language as the federal law did. (Which was more clear and did not challenge what was already on the federal books).
  • Robin B Sissy 2012/08/26 11:37:48
    Robin B
    He claimed that it was an unessary burden on abortionists and against the will of the woman. Don't read what he said after the fact, read what he testified to. He is EVIL to the core!
  • Sissy Robin B 2012/08/27 11:35:55
    Sissy
    That's your own opinion and not shared by the majority.
  • Robin B Sissy 2012/08/28 02:16:30
    Robin B
    Did you do your research?
  • Sissy Robin B 2012/08/28 10:50:48
    Sissy
    Yes I did. After your initial post on this issue and found that you made a simple statement and cherry-picked what you wanted to get out of it to make your own point.
  • Robin B Sissy 2012/08/28 14:45:38
    Robin B
    Did he or did he not make that statement?
  • Sissy Robin B 2012/08/28 15:31:16
    Sissy
    He made a statement but not anywhere near the context or distortion that you put it in.
  • Robin B Sissy 2012/08/28 18:27:13
    Robin B
    He didn't make a statement he made that statement. It must be hard to defend that.
  • Sissy Robin B 2012/08/29 12:43:10
    Sissy
    He made the statement that he could sign the federal law that Bush approved because it didn't open the door to challenge Roe. The Illinois law did and that was what he was opposed to. Had they had the same language as the federal law, he would have supported it.
  • Robin B Sissy 2012/08/29 20:55:24
    Robin B
    You are avoiding the facts, what he said when he testified against the protection for children aborted alive.
  • Sissy Robin B 2012/08/30 13:56:30
    Sissy
    And you're not listening.
  • Robin B Sissy 2012/09/04 04:54:12
    Robin B
    You what me to believe your view of what you think he ment. I know what he said. You need to take a closer look at the man... if the truth is important to you.
  • Sissy Robin B 2012/09/04 10:08:40
    Sissy
    Then I would suggest that you take a "closer look" at the candidates you're shilling for.
  • Robin B Sissy 2012/09/08 00:52:34
    Robin B
    +1
    No problem, I don't agree with every person with an R by their name. I am not scared to take an honest look at the people representing our country no matter the party. I can also admit when I have misjudged a person. Blind faith can be a dangerous thing.
  • Sissy Robin B 2012/09/09 12:47:21
    Sissy
    For sure.
  • TheMayor 2012/08/24 14:31:22
    Yes
    TheMayor
    +1
    it will crank up that social issue and the Dems will use that to downplay the economic conditions.
  • pete 2012/08/24 14:28:34
    No
    pete
    +3
    Missouri voters are smarter than that.

    The media is desperate to find things on Republican politicians and are left to grabbing for straws as the Democrat policies have not turned out to be the hope and change promised almost 4 years ago.

    How long will the "blame Bush" defense hold water? Piling on Aiken is a desperation move; hoping to get the electoral votes via the media.
  • scottcl... pete 2012/08/24 19:07:32
    scottcleaves
    +4
    Boy are you blind.
  • Butterfly scottcl... 2012/08/26 02:47:12
    Butterfly
    That would be you. Look at your Icon. lol
    .
    The dems, can ALWAYS blow up something not important, while ignoring the real issues. Ecomomy, Jobs, unemployment, military, deficit.
    Yes, what one man said, wrongly, about rape will make your bank account bigger, right?
  • dallasjoe pete 2012/08/25 00:46:51
    dallasjoe
    +3
    Pete Romney used this Doctor as a Source in 2008. Ryan has authore and co sponsored a "personhood" Admendment to the US Consitution, In Okla they trie to prevent male mastrabation since it killed sperm and hence a person.

    Ironic. one RWNJ writes a book and you treat it like the Fifth Gospel, but 10,000 Scientist claim there is Global Warming and you put your hands over your ears and go on to Babble, and say it is a Threoy
  • Guru_T_... dallasjoe 2012/08/25 16:27:47
  • dallasjoe Guru_T_... 2012/08/26 19:33:21
    dallasjoe
    +1
    ROFL TY
  • Guru_T_... pete 2012/08/25 16:18:22
    Guru_T_Firefly
    Missouri voters certainly aren't very smart if they elect an idiot like Akin. Fortunately, Missouri is rarely ever a critical state for any candidate to win.
  • Mr.Right 2012/08/24 14:23:06
    Yes
    Mr.Right
    +2
    I hope so.
  • Michael 2012/08/24 13:23:53
    Yes
    Michael
    Get ride of the dinosaur!
  • Quazimoto Michael 2012/08/24 14:40:00
    Quazimoto
    +1
    At what age are individuals classified as dinosaurs?
  • Sissy Quazimoto 2012/08/24 15:24:45
    Sissy
    +3
    I would guess an individual who thinks, acts, and wants to go back decades and resurrect issues long thought settled.
  • Sissy Michael 2012/08/24 15:24:04
    Sissy
    +2
    Ahhh but Michael, were Akin the only one, (who believes what he said), that might be possible. However there are so many now running amok in Congress who believe what Akin said but don't have the courage to stand by Their only goal is to make sure those damn women who go and get themselves raped are all "legitimate".
  • Michael Sissy 2012/08/27 19:42:47
    Michael
    and lots of WOMEN believe that if they breast feed their babies they won't get pregnant!
  • Diane Michael 2012/08/25 05:41:57 (edited)
    Diane
    +2
    Interestingly, Ryan sponsored a fetal personhood bill, which would effectively criminalize abortion and some forms of birth control without exceptions for rape victims. Romney has expressed his support for this bill.

    And something even more shocking is that a rapist has parental rights in most states, which would mean that a victim could be tied to her rapist for eighteen years, shuttling the child to and from his residence in a joint custody agreement.

    http://www.legalvoice.org/foc...
  • Butterfly Diane 2012/08/26 02:51:42 (edited)
    Butterfly
    It would not be done that way. No personal contact. There would be a neutral dropping off point. but you dems have to make it DRAMATIC don't you?
    .
    I would have to read that Bill myself, before I believe anything liberal/dem says on here. I have learned, a long time ago, if it is a dem, it is SPUN, facts left out, or outright lies.
    Are there THAT MANY RAPES in this country?
  • Diane Butterfly 2012/08/26 14:03:35 (edited)
    Diane
    +1
    Oh, well that's different. The child would be taken from the mother by someone else and delivered to the rapist. I see. Well, that's a lot better. (sarcasm)

    You asked, "Are there THAT MANY RAPES in this country?" According to a 2011 article I read, in a survey, one in five women experienced rape or attempted rape at some point in their lives. They may not have all reported the rapes.

    You should read this article below. There's a link at the end.

    Raped, pregnant and ordeal not over

    Chicago, Illinois (CNN) -- When I was in law school, my criminal law professor introduced us to the crime of rape by reading us a quote from Lord Chief Justice Sir Matthew Hale, a 17th-century English jurist: "In a rape case it is the victim, not the defendant, who is on trial."

    It was not merely a history lesson. I had lived it.

    While a student in my final year of college, at age 21, I was raped. I have dissected that moment -- the horrifying moment that I became a "victim" -- from every possible angle. I have poked and prodded, examined and re-examined. Regrettably, I have even suspected myself in a desperate, ultimately futile attempt to understand how I became a victim.

    But blaming myself was neither my idea nor my first inclination. I thought such 17th-century notions were long dead. I was wrong. Peopl...























    Oh, well that's different. The child would be taken from the mother by someone else and delivered to the rapist. I see. Well, that's a lot better. (sarcasm)

    You asked, "Are there THAT MANY RAPES in this country?" According to a 2011 article I read, in a survey, one in five women experienced rape or attempted rape at some point in their lives. They may not have all reported the rapes.

    You should read this article below. There's a link at the end.

    Raped, pregnant and ordeal not over

    Chicago, Illinois (CNN) -- When I was in law school, my criminal law professor introduced us to the crime of rape by reading us a quote from Lord Chief Justice Sir Matthew Hale, a 17th-century English jurist: "In a rape case it is the victim, not the defendant, who is on trial."

    It was not merely a history lesson. I had lived it.

    While a student in my final year of college, at age 21, I was raped. I have dissected that moment -- the horrifying moment that I became a "victim" -- from every possible angle. I have poked and prodded, examined and re-examined. Regrettably, I have even suspected myself in a desperate, ultimately futile attempt to understand how I became a victim.

    But blaming myself was neither my idea nor my first inclination. I thought such 17th-century notions were long dead. I was wrong. People who did not even know me were quick to comment or speculate on my rape. What were you wearing? Did you scream loudly? Did this occur in public?

    As my history lesson said, I found myself on trial, facing the most fierce judge and jury: ignorance.

    Eight years after my rape, I find myself on trial against ignorance again. Rep. Todd Akin's recent comments that "legitimate rape" rarely results in pregnancy not only flout scientific fact but, for me, cut deeper. Akin has de-legitimized my rape.

    You see, nine months after my rape, I gave birth to a beautiful little girl. You could say she was conceived in rape; she was. But she is also so much more than her beginnings. I blissfully believed that after I finally had decided to give birth to and to raise my daughter, life would be all roses and endless days at the playground. I was wrong again.

    It would not be long before I would learn firsthand that in the vast majority of states -- 31 -- men who father through rape are able to assert the same custody and visitation rights to their children that other fathers enjoy. When no law prohibits a rapist from exercising these rights, a woman may feel forced to bargain away her legal rights to a criminal trial in exchange for the rapist dropping the bid to have access to her child.

    When faced with the choice between a lifetime tethered to her rapist or meaningful legal redress, the answer may be easy, but it is not painless. For the sake of her child, the woman will sacrifice her need to see her once immensely powerful perpetrator humbled by the court.

    I know it because I lived it. I went to law school to learn how to stop it.

    Having fought this injustice for the past several years, I have come to believe that ignorance is to blame for this legal absence. Opponents argue no woman would ever choose to raise the child she conceived through rape. The only two studies to analyze the choices made by pregnant raped women indicate otherwise -- at least 30% of women who conceive by rape make this choice.

    Others argue that no rapist would ever seek parental rights. Not only does my experience and that of others I know prove otherwise, but it is not surprising that a man who cruelly degrades a woman would also seek to torture her in an even more agonizing way, by seeking access to her child.

    Today, it seems we may face a new and unbelievable challenge: convincing legislators that women can conceive when they are raped.

    Make no mistake, my efforts and the efforts of others to persuade legislators to pass laws restricting the parental rights of men who father through rape will be directly impacted by Akin's recent comments. Whether these efforts will be helped or hurt, however, depends upon us as a society.

    Either we will fight ignorance and take steps to legislate for raped women based upon reason and facts, or we will be led by ignorance and continue to make bad laws. Or fail to make good ones.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2012/0...
    (more)
  • Michael Diane 2012/08/27 19:42:15
    Michael
    +2
    Romney has made it clear he is for abortion allowed in cases of rape, health of the mother and incest.
  • Diane Michael 2012/08/28 02:16:10
    Diane
    The Republican Party on Tuesday quietly approved a platform that calls for a constitutional amendment banning abortion, and which does not provide exceptions for victims of rape or incest, or to save the life of the mother.

    If Romney were president, I'm sure he would not stand in the way if Congress attempted to strip women of their reproductive health rights.
  • Michael Diane 2012/08/29 17:35:34
    Michael
    +2
    You are plain wrong. Romney, and Ryan agreed, with the exceptions for rape, incest and health of mother. Not that this will calm you.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 20:01:38

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals