Aipacs wicked deeds on capitol hill
irish -liberty or death!
2010/04/07 15:01:25
|
|
|||||
|
2 votes
|
|
67% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
33% | |||
The New American Republic
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
AIPAC’S WICKED DEEDS ON CAPITOL HILL
WITH ITS $80 MILLION HEADQUARTERS ON CAPITOL HILL and staff of 275, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is a force no politician wishes to oppose.
At its March 22-24, 2010 annual “Policy Conference,” (”Demand Conference”), AIPAC was bombarded with Washington grovelers all trying to prove they are the bigger fan of Israel than the rest of the fawning pack of lawmakers.
Why? Because unlike any other organization, AIPAC has the power to end any politician’s career.
It is now commonly held knowledge in the Jew-controlled halls of Washington that if a politician ever speaks out for the rights of the Palestinians or even hints at Israel’s genocidal policies, this would mean the end of that lawmaker’s career.
Such a lawmaker would be shunned by his colleagues, making any legislation he proposes, particularly for his own state, almost impossible to get passed.
But more significantly, his opponent in the next election would be flooded with political donations and an advertising campaign that would either smear him — labeling the ‘offender’ a supporter of terrorism — or dredging up something ’scandalous’ from his past.
It happened to Alabama Congressman Earl Hilliard in 2002, a five-term incumbent who refused to sign an AIPAC-written House Resolution, a “pledge of allegiance” to the state of Israel. It nearly happened to Congressman Jim Moran in 2007 when he accused AIPAC of interfering with Congressional procedures and pointing to AIPAC as the primary agitator of the Iraq War.
Hilliard was defeated by a flood of pro-Israel money sent to his opponent, Arthur Davis. Over one million dollars of Davis’ campaign funding arrived just in the nick of time from New York City only thirty days before the primary. Hilliard said that most of the money came from AIPAC.
AIPAC DECIDES WHO GETS ELECTED
IN AN ALABAMA INTERVIEW, former Congressman Earl Hilliard brought to light the welding of the Jewish Lobbies with the Jewish-owned press and media:
The Black Commentator: The pro-Israel contributors made no secret of their support for your opponent, Arthur Davis. Was it their intention to make a public display of wealth?
Hilliard: Definitely - the seed of fear. It sends a message to every member of Congress.
The Black Commentator: What is the message?
Hilliard: Vote for Israel or face defeat.
The Black Commentator: Did you sense you were in danger?
Hilliard: Let me tell you when I first realized I had a problem. Several people called me and told me that Davis was on national TV, MSNBC, CNN, and to turn on CNN and I could pick it up every hour.
I said, No, man, that guy doesn’t have that kind of money. So I turned on CNN. AIPAC was introducing him at a fundraiser for him in Washington.
The next day the papers reported that Davis raised $272,000 at another AIPAC fundraiser in New York. When I got that news, I had only $22,000. Almost immediately, the next ads started, and they didn’t stop. They only increased in intensity.
The Black Commentator: Did the ads attempt to smear you?
Hilliard: Oh yeah, they really did. The ads shifted between my Middle East stands and my domestic views. I had voted not to send people to prison for life without parole and AIPAC twisted that to say that I voted to let pedophiles out of jail. View Entire Story Here.
AIPAC PROVIDES AMERICAN JEWRY with an on-file active “profile” of Senators and Congressmen including their voting statistics and their chief opponents. AIPAC then advises their huge Jewish constituency which candidates to support and donate money to.
Senators like Lindsey Graham and Jim Risch, both featured speakers at the AIPAC Policy Conference this year — know where the money is, who shells it out, and what it takes to get it.
JEWISH LIES - CONGRESS CONFIDES
“JEWS HAVE BEEN CALLED THE POISONERS OF MANKIND, the fomenters of instability, the source of all evil under the sun,” shouted out Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in his address at the AIPAC gala dinner at the Washington Convention Center.
For once the world heard the truth being uttered by a Zionist Jew regarding the actual state of affairs vis a vis Jewry’s role in world history. But the lies were soon to come from the lips of Netanyahu.
As the international community does not recognize Jerusalem and the West Bank as valid Israeli land but rather as “occupied territory,” Netanyahu defied the entire world (but NOT 300 members of Congress who recently signed a vow of allegiance to Israel) by stating in his speech that Jerusalem belongs to Israel:
“Jerusalem is not a settlement. It is our capital. All these neighborhoods are within a five-minute drive from the Knesset.
Everyone knows that these neighborhoods will be part of Israel in any peace settlement. Therefore, building in them in no way precludes the possibility of a two-state solution.” View Entire Story Here & Here.
Let Netanyahu and his shills on Capitol Hill tell that to the thousands of Palestinians whose homes were stolen and then demolished by Jewish bulldozers and US dollars. In other words, when dealing with the Jews of AIPAC, one must learn to read between the lies…
Source http://www.realzionistnews.com
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
AIPAC’S WICKED DEEDS ON CAPITOL HILL
WITH ITS $80 MILLION HEADQUARTERS ON CAPITOL HILL and staff of 275, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is a force no politician wishes to oppose.
At its March 22-24, 2010 annual “Policy Conference,” (”Demand Conference”), AIPAC was bombarded with Washington grovelers all trying to prove they are the bigger fan of Israel than the rest of the fawning pack of lawmakers.
Why? Because unlike any other organization, AIPAC has the power to end any politician’s career.
It is now commonly held knowledge in the Jew-controlled halls of Washington that if a politician ever speaks out for the rights of the Palestinians or even hints at Israel’s genocidal policies, this would mean the end of that lawmaker’s career.
Such a lawmaker would be shunned by his colleagues, making any legislation he proposes, particularly for his own state, almost impossible to get passed.
But more significantly, his opponent in the next election would be flooded with political donations and an advertising campaign that would either smear him — labeling the ‘offender’ a supporter of terrorism — or dredging up something ’scandalous’ from his past.
It happened to Alabama Congressman Earl Hilliard in 2002, a five-term incumbent who refused to sign an AIPAC-written House Resolution, a “pledge of allegiance” to the state of Israel. It nearly happened to Congressman Jim Moran in 2007 when he accused AIPAC of interfering with Congressional procedures and pointing to AIPAC as the primary agitator of the Iraq War.
Hilliard was defeated by a flood of pro-Israel money sent to his opponent, Arthur Davis. Over one million dollars of Davis’ campaign funding arrived just in the nick of time from New York City only thirty days before the primary. Hilliard said that most of the money came from AIPAC.
AIPAC DECIDES WHO GETS ELECTED
IN AN ALABAMA INTERVIEW, former Congressman Earl Hilliard brought to light the welding of the Jewish Lobbies with the Jewish-owned press and media:
The Black Commentator: The pro-Israel contributors made no secret of their support for your opponent, Arthur Davis. Was it their intention to make a public display of wealth?
Hilliard: Definitely - the seed of fear. It sends a message to every member of Congress.
The Black Commentator: What is the message?
Hilliard: Vote for Israel or face defeat.
The Black Commentator: Did you sense you were in danger?
Hilliard: Let me tell you when I first realized I had a problem. Several people called me and told me that Davis was on national TV, MSNBC, CNN, and to turn on CNN and I could pick it up every hour.
I said, No, man, that guy doesn’t have that kind of money. So I turned on CNN. AIPAC was introducing him at a fundraiser for him in Washington.
The next day the papers reported that Davis raised $272,000 at another AIPAC fundraiser in New York. When I got that news, I had only $22,000. Almost immediately, the next ads started, and they didn’t stop. They only increased in intensity.
The Black Commentator: Did the ads attempt to smear you?
Hilliard: Oh yeah, they really did. The ads shifted between my Middle East stands and my domestic views. I had voted not to send people to prison for life without parole and AIPAC twisted that to say that I voted to let pedophiles out of jail. View Entire Story Here.
AIPAC PROVIDES AMERICAN JEWRY with an on-file active “profile” of Senators and Congressmen including their voting statistics and their chief opponents. AIPAC then advises their huge Jewish constituency which candidates to support and donate money to.
Senators like Lindsey Graham and Jim Risch, both featured speakers at the AIPAC Policy Conference this year — know where the money is, who shells it out, and what it takes to get it.
JEWISH LIES - CONGRESS CONFIDES
“JEWS HAVE BEEN CALLED THE POISONERS OF MANKIND, the fomenters of instability, the source of all evil under the sun,” shouted out Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu in his address at the AIPAC gala dinner at the Washington Convention Center.
For once the world heard the truth being uttered by a Zionist Jew regarding the actual state of affairs vis a vis Jewry’s role in world history. But the lies were soon to come from the lips of Netanyahu.
As the international community does not recognize Jerusalem and the West Bank as valid Israeli land but rather as “occupied territory,” Netanyahu defied the entire world (but NOT 300 members of Congress who recently signed a vow of allegiance to Israel) by stating in his speech that Jerusalem belongs to Israel:
“Jerusalem is not a settlement. It is our capital. All these neighborhoods are within a five-minute drive from the Knesset.
Everyone knows that these neighborhoods will be part of Israel in any peace settlement. Therefore, building in them in no way precludes the possibility of a two-state solution.” View Entire Story Here & Here.
Let Netanyahu and his shills on Capitol Hill tell that to the thousands of Palestinians whose homes were stolen and then demolished by Jewish bulldozers and US dollars. In other words, when dealing with the Jews of AIPAC, one must learn to read between the lies…
Source http://www.realzionistnews.com
The Palestinians by default are Israel's sacrificial lamb. It is disgusting, but even if we totally dissociate ourselves frrom it (which I think wouldn't stop them killing and starving these people and building on their settlements), I don't think the public (world) opininoor their situation is likely to change. What do you think?
Now why there has been an upstep in radical fundamentalism is complex, but once again, America's hands are not clean in this problem, are they? Not that I'm saying we are to blame for the actions of others.
I personally feel lost in many ways politically. I can understand for instance, the angst many tea partiers feel where the gov't is concerned. And yet their methods of solving problems don't seem like the right ones. To make matters worse, they support the endless wars and occupations, they believe Might makes Right, and some of the ideology ...
Now why there has been an upstep in radical fundamentalism is complex, but once again, America's hands are not clean in this problem, are they? Not that I'm saying we are to blame for the actions of others.
I personally feel lost in many ways politically. I can understand for instance, the angst many tea partiers feel where the gov't is concerned. And yet their methods of solving problems don't seem like the right ones. To make matters worse, they support the endless wars and occupations, they believe Might makes Right, and some of the ideology they say they don't agree with, like religous fundamentalism, they appear to embrace. If you aren't part of the solution, then you are part of the problem, and if you have no opinion either way, you are complacent even if you are unaware or too busy just trying to survive as so many are.
yes ,the fighting back is becoming corrupted probably from within as the gov't uses cointelpro to disrupt any disagreements with their plans. the tea party is right in their original aims,however they are allowing themselves to be distracted by those who profit from the distraction.
i was reading an article by one of the first tea partiers,helped to organize it. he is also a 9/11 truther ,and pointed out they are the ones who star...
yes ,the fighting back is becoming corrupted probably from within as the gov't uses cointelpro to disrupt any disagreements with their plans. the tea party is right in their original aims,however they are allowing themselves to be distracted by those who profit from the distraction.
i was reading an article by one of the first tea partiers,helped to organize it. he is also a 9/11 truther ,and pointed out they are the ones who started the tea party movement. at one of the tea parties he was holding a sign saying 9/11 truth. people were telling him to get out he didn't belong there etc etc and getting nasty. he was appalled that they didn't know that it was the truth movement that was pushing the tea party movement. so the corruption has begun and the easily distracted will bring it down.
I find it difficult to support a group of people who can't be bothered to look into who it is that is running their events. They can say later that they don't support such things, but claiming ignorance is a fool's game and not one I'm willing to play.
You make very valid points. Humans are territorial, and if you are not a Tea Party Patriot then to them you are not patriotic at all, especially if you question things. Hmmmm, I wonder why that is.......
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
You also forget that Jews are predominantly Democrats and only constitute 5.5 million people and the US population is 300 million approximately. So how are Jews responsible?
And do you think that Jews shouldn't have a lobby group, if so why not? Do you think that other minorities should, if so or if not why?
Funny how you accuse AIPAC of agitating the Iraq war when it was Benjamin Netanyahu on record telling the US not to strike Iraq because Israel and bombed it's nuclear facilities and rendered them useless.
Funny how International Law only applies to Israel and it is held to a higher moral and ethical standard that other nations - why is that? Where is the outrage and moral indignation when the
Name a comparable threat on the planet which is the same as the Israel/"Palestine" issue.
I think it high time that you actually educated yourself with history and facts not falsehoods, mischaracterisations and plain myths. The integrity of the facts and evidence stand on their own merit.
Your source of information of realzionistnews Frank Weltner's site which is hardly objective or balanced. I would also avoid quote mining it's amateurish and dishonest.
and the biggest funny?
YOU ARE NOT AMERICAN! or so you claim. funny that!
Actually Benjamin Netanyahu BEFORE I repeat BEFORE the US invaded Iraq told them (the US) ON RECORD not to invade Iraq because Israel had bombed Iraq's nuclear facilities - FACT. Now I sure you don't like it or don't want to accept these facts and that isn't my problem - the validity and factual integrity of what I said remains and the fact it is a matter of public record! I actually happen to back what I say up with facts.
Besides how would you know I'm not - are you clairvoyant/psychic or do you know something (based on no evidence) that I do not?
It seems you can't refute a single FACT I've written so you resort to ad hominum attacks because evidently what you say holds no basis in fact or reality.
November 2003, a respected Tel Aviv thinktank concluded that Israeli intelligence had joined the US and Britain in an "exaggerated assessment" of Iraqi weapons.
In 2002, the former head of the Mossad intelligence agency, Efraim Halevy, told a closed meeting of Nato that there were "clear indications" that Iraq had renewed its efforts to build WMD after the UN weapons inspections were halted in 1998. He also said Iraq had preserved elements of its ability to manufacture chemical and biological weapons
Jerusalem - A government critic said on Tuesday that Israel was aware before the war against Iraq that Saddam Hussein did not possess weapons of mass destruction, but Israel did not inform the United States.
Israel put itself on war footing before the US invasion last year, passing out gas mask kits to its citizens and then ordering them to open the kits, a step that eventually will cost millions, since components would have to be replaced.
But lawmaker Yossi Sarid, a member...
November 2003, a respected Tel Aviv thinktank concluded that Israeli intelligence had joined the US and Britain in an "exaggerated assessment" of Iraqi weapons.
In 2002, the former head of the Mossad intelligence agency, Efraim Halevy, told a closed meeting of Nato that there were "clear indications" that Iraq had renewed its efforts to build WMD after the UN weapons inspections were halted in 1998. He also said Iraq had preserved elements of its ability to manufacture chemical and biological weapons
Jerusalem - A government critic said on Tuesday that Israel was aware before the war against Iraq that Saddam Hussein did not possess weapons of mass destruction, but Israel did not inform the United States.
Israel put itself on war footing before the US invasion last year, passing out gas mask kits to its citizens and then ordering them to open the kits, a step that eventually will cost millions, since components would have to be replaced.
But lawmaker Yossi Sarid, a member of the Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee, said on Tuesday that Israeli intelligence knew beforehand that Iraq had no weapons stockpiles and misled US President George Bush.
'Israel didn't want to spoil President Bush's scenario'
In contrast, a lawmaker from Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Likud Party said Israel had shared its doubts with the Americans.
During the first Gulf war in 1991, Iraq fired 39 Scud missiles at Israel, all with conventional warheads. Last year Israel appointed a stern general, Amos Gilead, as its liaison with the population. Gilead filled the airwaves with dire warnings of possible chemical or biological attacks from Iraq.
Sarid, who represents the dovish opposition Meretz Party, said it was just a costly show - Israeli intelligence knew the threat was "very, very, very limited."
"It was known in Israel that the story that weapons of mass destruction could be activated in 45 minutes was an old wives' tale," said Sarid, regarding a claim leading up to the war.
Israeli critics say the government of Sharon maintained the state of alert for its own political reasons, to help galvanise public opinion in favour of harsh steps against the Palestinians.
The United States and Britain have launched inquiries into intelligence reports about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, used by leaders of both nations as part of their justification for the invasion. So far such weapons have not been found.
AGAIN ,YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
as for not being an american,i brought it up for the very reason that you are such a busy body about how we are being led around by the zionists. very curious!
The key point is 1998 which is why Israel bombed the Iraqi nuclear facility and why Benjamin Netanyahu told the us NOT to invade because Iraq was not longer a threat again this is a matter of PUBLIC record.
Now when did the US invaded Iraq in 2003?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisd...
Israel had bombed Iraq in 1983 - rendering it useless
http://www.historycommons.org...
Former director of Israeli intelligence Uzi Arad says that many Israelis were keenly disappointed in the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq and not Iran. Arad says: “If you look at President Bush’s ‘axis of evil’ (see January 29, 2002), all of us said North Korea and Iran are more urgent
http://www.historycommons.org...
FIVE YEARS LATER DO YOU UNDERSTAND
It's not my problem if the US put Saddam in power - it's your problem - blame Israel/Zionists/AIPAC as you seem to be doing for everything.
AND WHAT DOES HE'S ELECTION HAVE TO DO WITH THE ADVICE HE GIVES AS A POLITICIAN IN A POLITICAL CAPACITY - MOOT POINT!!!!
And exactly what has installing Saddam have to do with anything anyway? The US supplied him with arms in his war with Iraq.
Learn your Middle Eastern geopolitics. The point is Israel is not responsible for Iraq's war PERIOD. STICK TO THE TOPIC!!!!
yes israel is responsible just as they are using the same ridiculous statements to try and go after iran. it is you that is grossly ignorant on facts. try reading a non pro israel paper or news sometime.