Agree or Disagree: The Democrat Party still is the party of slavery.
Savior
2012/05/07 18:52:59
I have to agree
Democrats can't hide from their pro-slavery past, but in order to disguise themselves as "non-racists" they jumped on board the affirmative action train in the 1960's.
The Democrats will argue that racism switched sides during the civil rights movement, the Republicans became the racists and Democrats were the non-racists.
But what really happened was Democrats jumped on board affirmative action because it was a new form of racism (because it treated people as ethnic groups, and not individuals, whereas Republicans who wanted to be the party who stood up for individualism was saying your color should not decide whether or not you succeed or fail)
And Democrats remained pro-slavery, by promising everyone welfare, and entitlements for everyone. in return for a bundle of votes.
Republicans have a word for people who do other things for people who are in return provided with free food and free housing.
Democrats can't hide from their pro-slavery past, but in order to disguise themselves as "non-racists" they jumped on board the affirmative action train in the 1960's.
The Democrats will argue that racism switched sides during the civil rights movement, the Republicans became the racists and Democrats were the non-racists.
But what really happened was Democrats jumped on board affirmative action because it was a new form of racism (because it treated people as ethnic groups, and not individuals, whereas Republicans who wanted to be the party who stood up for individualism was saying your color should not decide whether or not you succeed or fail)
And Democrats remained pro-slavery, by promising everyone welfare, and entitlements for everyone. in return for a bundle of votes.
Republicans have a word for people who do other things for people who are in return provided with free food and free housing.
















China is called “the Yellow giant” EVERY DAY. But nobody is saying “Asia is not a Yellow country! There is no Yellow country!”
Israel is called “the Jewish State” EVERY DAY. But nobody is saying “Israel is not a Jewish State! There is no Jewish State!”
Anti-Whites like YOU complain ONLY when EVERY White country and ONLY White countries are called “a White country”.
You say you are anti-racist. What you are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
Whenever this drivel comes up in a discussion, I dismiss it as the lunatic ravings of a mindless idealogue and left-wing nut-job, merely regurgitating the party line (or is that 'the party lie?'), I can't help but seriously question whether anyone espousing such ludricrous claims is even capable of intelligent, rational thought. It's obvious they're incapable of even the simplest historical research.
Wanna try to tell me Lester Maddox. George Wallace or Lurleen Wallace, John Williams, William Waller were Republicans? There a mere handful of those elected as a Southern Governor AFTER the civil rights act and the voting rights act were passed. As you were obviously too illiterate to grasp it the first time, let me again point out the the Republicans in Congress voted for the Civil Rights Act with a 90% yea vote and the Voting Rights Act with a 97% yea vote.
I don't know what you think you lived through, but I lived through it, too, as well as studied it and apparently did so a Hell of a lot better than you.
Since you obviously either won't study history or can't grasp historical fact, you can always try starting your argument with "I have here in my hand a list..."
As I stated before, whenever this drivel comes up in a discussion, I dismiss it as the lunatic ravings of a mindless idealogue and left-wing nut-job, merely regurgitating the party line.
Put down the Kool-Ade and quit drooling.
So you're telling me the Democrats became Republicans and continued to vote for racist Democrats such as the Wallaces, Faubus and Maddox, right?
You've convinced me - you weren't drinking the Kool-Ade - you're not delusional - you're actually stupid enough to believe the drivel you've been spewing!
Me how many southern states did the republicans carry during presidential elections before the south turned republican. It is a relief to know that less informed citizens are outside the mainstream.
The only thing that's happened is the South is no longer solidly Democrat. Thank you for admitting that Carter and Clinton both carried southern states AFTER 1964, proving my point that the south isn't solid republican.
It's sad to realize that Liberal fools such as you really are ineducable.