A good reason to vote against Obama - High Maintenance! It cost ~ 243 times as much to maintain America's "Royal Family" as it costs to maintain Great Britain's

Ken 2012/10/02 21:51:35


Obama and Family Cost Taxpayers 1.4 Billion Dollars Last Year

Posted By Daniel Greenfield On September 27, 2012 @ 3:40 pm In The Point

Hello Britain, can we have your royal family back? Sorry about that revolution thing, but it turns out that ours just costs too much.

Taxpayers spent $1.4 billion dollars on everything from
staffing, housing, flying and entertaining President Obama and his
family last year. In comparison, British taxpayers spent just $57.8
million on the royal family.

Gray told The Daily Caller that the $1.4 billion spent on the Obama
family last year is the “total cost of the presidency,” factoring the
cost of the “biggest staff in history at the highest wages ever,” a 50
percent increase in the numbers of appointed czars and an Air Force One
“running with the frequency of a scheduled air line.”

But come on. Bo needs his taxpayer paid staffer.

The president’s dog gets its own high-paid staffer: “Bo
made the news when he and his handler were flown to join the president
on vacation in Maine,”
Gray wrote about the Obama family dog. “It has
been reported that the first family’s dog handler was paid $102,000,
last year.”

Just wait till Obama appoints Bo to the Senate or the Supreme Court.

These figures mean that the Cost of Obama is about 0.1 percent of the annual deficit. Now there’s a deficit cutting solution.


So maintaining the British Royal Family costs only 0.41% of the amount
that maintaining the U.S. "Royal Family" costs? I'd gladly swap!

Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest

  • NotYou 2012/10/07 09:31:52
    Obama needs to raise taxes because Michelle has made some more vacation plans.
  • Ken NotYou 2012/10/07 16:16:25
    LOL! What Obama doesn't understand about the economy is that higher tax rates seldom translate to higher tax revenues. In the eight years after Reagan lowered the tax rates, revenues nearly doubled. Economists know that the only way to get rid of our enormous deficits is to grow the economy, and higher taxes will not do that.
  • Red Branch 2012/10/04 19:32:55
    Red Branch
    And he talks about the American people paying higher taxes. He needs to go.
  • texasred 2012/10/02 23:48:27
    In one freakin' year???
  • UGH...LIBS ~ PWCM ~ JLA ~ B... 2012/10/02 22:20:35
    UGH...LIBS ~ PWCM ~ JLA ~ BttB ~
    This estimate is not even close.

    The British royal family did not run up the national debt by $1.5 trillion per year, so the real cost ratio is over 25,000.
  • Ken UGH...L... 2012/10/02 22:52:45
    The estimate is for the cost of the President and his family, not the U.S. budget.
  • UGH...L... Ken 2012/10/02 22:57:31
    UGH...LIBS ~ PWCM ~ JLA ~ BttB ~
    There are direct costs and indirect costs. : )
  • rightside 2012/10/02 21:58:14
    Did you honestly think that they would sacrifice for the good of the country?
    ha ha ha
  • Ken rightside 2012/10/02 21:59:37
    Jimmy did - he turned down the White House thermostats and wore a sweater. He also carried his own (empty) luggage for show! Dims can't help themselves - they are all phony bastards.
  • rightside Ken 2012/10/02 22:00:45
    Yeah, I was reading about the empty luggage. I also hear he appears with a hammer and then has a picture and goes away for habitat.
  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/10/02 21:54:19
    Hey, there, you British "republicans" (As in: United Republic of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.) Warning: you might not save nearly as much money as you think.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2016/02/10 20:07:07

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals