A chip will be implanted in all Americans in March of 2013; Did you know it is mandated in Obamacare?

by Kara ~~~ American Patriot Posted 2012/07/09 22:43:20

Related Topics: Obamacare, Obama, Barack Obama, Freedom, Americans, 2013, Unconstitutional, Vote, American

777 votes
Read all 596 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	I did not know....	314 votes	40%
	I know....	85 votes	11%
	It is a totally communistic and unconstitutional.	260 votes	33%
	None of the above	118 votes	15%

The chip implant is one of the laws slipped into Obamacare. Yes, all American citizens will be required as of March 2013 to have the chip implanted. When this happens our freedom is totally gone. We will be saying, "Good-by Freedom".

It is a must to vote Barack Obama out of office to maintain our Freedom.
Obamacare must be repealed as well.

+22

Add a comment above

Kara ~~~ American Patriot 2012/07/09 22:59:57

I did not know....

+15
It is totally communistic and unconstitutional. They will not put it in me as long as I am able to fight...

>> See Replies

More polls by Kara ~~~ American Patriot

bmxschoolbus 2012/07/10 00:21:21
MarcusRP to bmxscho... 2012/07/10 01:17:26

+2
This isn't true.

reply
MQ-American Values Again (AVA) 2012/07/10 00:21:19 (edited)

I did not know....

+3
And I'm willing to bet 99.5% of Americans did not know... this is the kind of information Obama is trying to cover up ... or haven't you noticed he doesn't talk about Obamacare .. his fear is that Americans will see it for what it is ..

Wake up America ... while you still can without a chip in your arm!

_______________
They're not gonna chip me... I'm not a damned monkey! I'm ready for ya bitches!

reply
MarcusRP to MQ-Amer... 2012/07/10 01:17:55

+3
You'll be ready for a while, because this is a hoax.

reply
AL 2012/07/10 00:10:52

None of the above

+1
They would have to kill me first!

reply
MarcusRP to AL 2012/07/10 01:18:12

+2
False. This question is a hoax.

reply
AL to MarcusRP 2012/07/10 03:15:14

+1
You know what, I could care less if you think its all pie in the sky-yet I'm never going to accept any chip in my body anyway partner!

reply
MarcusRP to AL 2012/07/10 03:17:52

+1
That's good, because it's not going to happen anytime soon, because this question is a bad hoax.

reply
AL to MarcusRP 2012/07/10 03:22:16

+1
LOL! I bet there was alot of Germans that never thought Hitler would have ever opened up death camps at one time as well!

reply
MarcusRP to AL 2012/07/10 03:25:42

+1
Because Obama is Hitler.

reply
AL to MarcusRP 2012/07/10 03:35:02

+2
Because some people refuse to see real evil-even when its right before their eyes infact

reply
MarcusRP to AL 2012/07/10 03:38:55

+1
Fair point.

reply
Linkums 2012/07/09 23:54:43

None of the above

+4
I'm about 99% that is false information and that you should be smart enough to not pass it along.

reply
Kara ~~... to Linkums 2012/07/10 00:03:28

+2
Are you 100% sure that it is not in the Obamacare bill?

reply
Linkums to Kara ~~... 2012/07/10 00:05:12

+5
No. I believe I said 99% if you look closely.

reply
AL to Linkums 2012/07/10 00:24:18

+1
Well have you yourself,looked into H.R. 4872 or H.R. 3290 yet then?

reply
Party o... to AL 2012/07/10 01:19:07

I'm better at understanding English grammar than I am with intricate legal documents as "you yourself" might imagine, but I can handle discerning a full-blown line of BS when I see surveys such as this. Linkums is correct in not buying into that pile...good luck believing otherwise.

reply
AL to Party o... 2012/07/10 03:19:54

+1
"Party O" I could care less if you believe it or not, Yet as a Christain myself, I would never accept anyone trying to put a chip in my body anyway! So if the day ever comes when the Government ask you, GOOD LUCK!

reply
MarcusRP to Linkums 2012/07/10 01:18:36

+1
It is completely false.

reply
ed 2012/07/09 23:52:48

It is a totally communistic and unconstitutional.

+6
PLANTED IN ALL BUT ONE

reply
Kara ~~... to ed 2012/07/10 00:02:20

+5
The fight is on...

reply
ed to Kara ~~... 2012/07/10 00:25:06

+3
That it is

reply
Rogue_L... to ed 2012/07/10 00:28:32
MarcusRP to ed 2012/07/10 01:18:50

+2
It's a hoax.

reply
ed to MarcusRP 2012/07/10 08:33:55

lets see what proof you can come up with to prove otherwise.

reply
Wolf97 to ed 2012/07/10 18:53:40 (edited)

The burden of proof lies with the the person who makes/supports the claim.

reply
Primitive Christian 2012/07/09 23:52:16

None of the above

+7
I can't believe people still fall for this.

reply
ed to Primiti... 2012/07/10 00:25:30

+1
can you prove it to be false?

reply
Primiti... to ed 2012/07/10 01:02:13

+2
I don't have to, the onus (burden of proof) is upon the person making the positive statement.

reply
Z to Primiti... 2012/07/10 01:36:35

While I don't agree with that statement (this isn't the court of law and in many instances, that isn't the case.) here is the proof that it isn't.

http://www.snopes.com/politic...

reply
Primiti... to Z 2012/07/10 02:03:22

+2
I'm looking at it as a quasi debate. (debated for years and also was a moderator) In many cases in formal debate not defending a positive statement with reliable evidence is at best useless and often will result in a penalty.

I don't use snopes here. Most Conservatives will dismiss it without even reading it.

reply
Z to Primiti... 2012/07/10 02:34:21

No, most conservatives won't. That is an absurd position to take, and one without any evidence to support it.

reply
Primiti... to Z 2012/07/10 02:48:17

+1
Let me rephrase, it has been my experience that most conservatives on SodaHead dismiss Snopes.com. Would you like me to post a poll in an attempt to discover what Conservatives on SH think of Snopes?

reply
Z to Primiti... 2012/07/10 03:51:47

+1
You can if you want, but only conservatives that don't trust snopes will actually use it. It's the passion problem.

reply
Primiti... to Z 2012/07/10 19:08:35

I'm speaking most of SH Conservatives. Many (at least those most active here) do suffer from "the passion problem". Confirmation bias is actually a problem here with most regulars to the news/politics section regardless of political affiliation or affinity. And yes I am aware that this too is a generalization. It too is simply a result of my experience and observation. I don't offer it as a fact, simply as an opinion.

reply
Z to Primiti... 2012/07/11 01:09:25

+1
Well, while that is true, that isn't what the passion problem is. The passion problem is a political science term that essentially means ponies generally only act when they are passionate about something. Some ponies refer it to as the silent majority.

reply
ed to Primiti... 2012/07/10 08:35:24

in other words you have none

reply
Primiti... to ed 2012/07/10 19:02:59

It's impossible to prove that it's not there without reading the entire PPACA to you. Again the Onus is upon the person making the positive statement to prove their positive statement. So please feel free to prove that it is in the current law and that it means what you believe it does. Make sure that you actually use the PPACA as passed in Congress, enacted by President Obama and upheld by the SCOTUS and not an earlier or partial version.

reply
ed to Primiti... 2012/07/10 22:37:37

read on

reply
Primiti... to ed 2012/07/11 01:34:53

Again I don't need to, I'm not trying to prove something isn't there. I don't care if you believe something is there without reading it yourself.

reply