A chip will be implanted in all Americans in March of 2013; Did you know it is mandated in Obamacare?
Kara ~~~ Real American
2012/07/09 22:43:20
|
|
|||||
|
314 votes
|
|
40% | ||
|
85 votes
|
|
11% | ||
|
260 votes
|
|
33% | ||
|
118 votes
|
|
15% | ||
The chip implant is one of the laws slipped into Obamacare. Yes, all American citizens will be required as of March 2013 to have the chip implanted. When this happens our freedom is totally gone. We will be saying, "Good-by Freedom".
It is a must to vote Barack Obama out of office to maintain our Freedom.
Obamacare must be repealed as well.
It is a must to vote Barack Obama out of office to maintain our Freedom.
Obamacare must be repealed as well.
Top Opinion
-
I did not know....
+15It is totally communistic and unconstitutional. They will not put it in me as long as I am able to fight...
Even if you gave it a moments thought, to place a chip in 300 million people would take decades and still have to deal with the regular healthcare issues on a daily basis. Like Forest said, Stupid is as stupid does."
Add
6
H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1.
The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? As you saw earlier, it is the device approved by the FDA in 2004.
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:
www.fda.gov/downloads/Medical...
A class II implantable device is an "implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information." The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as "claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary."
Its supposed to be used in association with medical implants like pacemakers or insulin pumps to create a data base to track their effectiveness and to help facilitate recalls.
After all how can an RIFD chip by itself be considered life-supporting or life-sustaining?
Anyway this was in HR3200 that never made its way into the law (HR4280 I think?) So this in now way supports your claim that they are mandatory let alone designed for the nefarious purposes that are being repeated in these chain emails and threads here.
One idiot on another thread went as far as to say that there would be a GPS tracking device on it and that it would also contain cyanide that could be released on govt. command as ridiculous as that sounds.
YOU'D THINK, you'd think that when they see the utter nonsense they are being asked to believe, YOU'D THINK they'd stop for a second, and question themselves. "Am I, perhaps, being led astray?" you think they might ask themselves.
Do you ever stop to think that perhaps you are being used - fed lies that you buy into and spread, without knowing you are being used?
Wouldn't you want to STOP that, if you knew?
Debunked: Obamacare RFID Chip Implant Law Hoax
There's a hoax going around that the health care reform act HR3200 (The Affordable Care Act, aka "Obamacare") requires everyone to get a chip implanted in their body.
This has already been quite well debunked over on Snopes:
http://www.snopes.com/politic...
The bottom line is:
The proposed law did not require anyone to get anything implanted
It just created a national registry of a huge of range of medical devices from pacemakers to dental implants
The intent of the registry was to collect statistics on how safe and effective the devices are
HR3200 is not the bill that passed. That's HR 3590, which does not have the registry.
An implantable RFID chip is simply one example of a class II implantable medical device. Others include:
http://emedicine.medscape.com...
Content from external source:
percutaneous catheters
vascular graft prostheses
bone-conduction hearing aids
tympanostomy tubes
gastrointestinal tubes
implantable st...
Debunked: Obamacare RFID Chip Implant Law Hoax
There's a hoax going around that the health care reform act HR3200 (The Affordable Care Act, aka "Obamacare") requires everyone to get a chip implanted in their body.
This has already been quite well debunked over on Snopes:
http://www.snopes.com/politic...
The bottom line is:
The proposed law did not require anyone to get anything implanted
It just created a national registry of a huge of range of medical devices from pacemakers to dental implants
The intent of the registry was to collect statistics on how safe and effective the devices are
HR3200 is not the bill that passed. That's HR 3590, which does not have the registry.
An implantable RFID chip is simply one example of a class II implantable medical device. Others include:
http://emedicine.medscape.com...
Content from external source:
percutaneous catheters
vascular graft prostheses
bone-conduction hearing aids
tympanostomy tubes
gastrointestinal tubes
implantable staples
long-term intravascular catheters
intracranial pressure monitor devices
peripheral nerve stimulators for pain relief
eye sphere implants
intramedullary fixation rods
joint prostheses
Here's the original bill (which did not ever become law):
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/...
And here's what it says:
SEC. 2521. NATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTRY.
[...]
‘‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—
‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and
‘‘(B) is—
‘‘(i) a class III device; or
‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining
There's a little more about administrative things, but the above is the entirety of what the conspiracy promoters base their theory on. They get away with it in part because the language of the bill is rather complex and difficult to read, so they can basically make up whatever interpretation they like, and many of their readers will be fooled.
They then build upon this by claiming that a Class II device is a
"implantable radiofrequency transponder system for patient identification and health information."
When actually the three classes of medical devices have nothing to do with what the devices are, but are to do with how much they are regulated to ensure safety. For example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Class III devices are usually those that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury.[9] Examples of Class III devices which currently require a premarket notification include implantable pacemaker, pulse generators, HIV diagnostic tests, automated external defibrillators, and endosseous implants.
Devices in Class II are held to a higher level of assurance than Class I devices, and are designed to perform as indicated without causing injury or harm to patient or user. Examples of Class II devices include powered wheelchairs, infusion pumps, and surgical drapes.
Most Class I devices are exempt from the premarket notification and/or good manufacturing practices regulation.[7][9][10] Examples of Class I devices include elastic bandages, examination gloves, and hand-held surgical instruments.
So the law simply creates a registry for this HUGE range of different medical devices.
Implantable RFID chips would be covered under the law, but that's simply because they are one of thousands of devices that are classified as Type III or Type II implantable.
It's not a law, and even if it was, it no more mandates you get a chip implanted than it mandates you get a hip replacement.
Well, one can hope, I guess. I mean, the Cubs will win the World Series one of these years, won't they?