A challenge to conservatives. Without saying anything about Obama why should I vote for Mitt Romney?

by Adam Posted 2012/07/16 02:01:06

Related Topics: Mitt Romney, Obama, Conservative, Conservatives, Romney, Mitt, Vote

Read More

Read all 246 opinions

☆Ed☆ 2012/07/16 04:19:21

+8
LOL, to get rid of Biden, Clinton, and Holder!!!

I hope you noticed that I didn't use the "O" word!!!
>> See Replies

More polls by Adam

Don Leuty to Adam 2012/07/21 00:09:03

You can cure pneumonia, but not a cold. Asked and answered. Hope you enjoy 0bama 2.0.

reply
Adam to Don Leuty 2012/07/22 04:29:07

Those who stand with evil will receive evil. I'm sorry to say they are both evil.

Luke 9:24
24 For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will save it.

It is better than I stand for righteousness without a worry about what might come of it than to stand with evil and be judged for it.

reply
Al B Thayer 2012/07/16 02:14:08

+5
Because Mittens isn't a liar nor does he give me any indication he wants to turn the country into a socialist nanny state. Mittens supports free enterprise Capitolism. He's not a baby killer. Supports Israel and is not someone middle east countries like.

reply
Adam to Al B Th... 2012/07/16 02:27:24

His record says otherwise both in lying and baby killing. Why do you think he got the etch of sketch label.

reply
Al B Th... to Adam 2012/07/16 04:04:49

With the progress we have made in science. It's easy to understand why someone would change their position on abortion. Had he gone the other way I would question the reasoning.

reply
Adam to Al B Th... 2012/07/17 03:51:20

Really name one single piece of legislation where he either approved or voted for that is pro-life. Without that proven record of change I can't stand with him.

reply
Al B Th... to Adam 2012/07/17 22:53:15

Well bang the drum Adam.

reply
zbacku 2012/07/16 02:12:46

+4
He's not a Marxist.

reply
Adam to zbacku 2012/07/16 02:14:59

Marxist = Relation to Obama because this is the main complaint for the last 3 years is that Obama is a socialist/marxist/communist. So you failed to follow the rules.

reply
zbacku to Adam 2012/07/16 02:16:18

+4
Don't think so. Romney is NOT a Marxist. I said nothing about Obama.

reply
Adam to zbacku 2012/07/16 02:28:23

+1
you said marxist because you believe Obama is a Marxist. Don't insult my intelligence by saying it is not so. Now give me an answer of what Romney stands for. Not what he doesn't stand for.

reply
Lady Wh... to zbacku 2012/07/16 10:17:19

Romney is a socialist for THE WEALTHY.

reply
Don Leuty to Lady Wh... 2012/07/16 16:28:30

Romney is a social liberal and a fiscal conservative. A hand up instead of a hand out preserves the dignity of the individual and does not make the individual a victim.

He has the capacity and the will to actually help the American people out of this morass, not deepen. The great campaigner is a superb orator, but his beautiful words ring empty.
The great unifier has proven to be the supreme divider.

There is more about Lenin than Lincoln in him.

reply
Red_Horse 2012/07/16 02:11:41
Adam to Red_Horse 2012/07/16 02:16:06

+1
And how will he do that? Time and time again, debate after debate Mitt Romney either refuses to stand for something or he stands for everything. So again I ask how is he going to restore America.

reply
Red_Horse to Adam 2012/07/16 02:26:49 (edited)
Adam to Red_Horse 2012/07/16 02:39:42

+1
Ok who do you vote for if you believe that both of the 2 main choices are going to destroy America? (Your answer to this in no way answers the first question)

reply
Red_Horse to Adam 2012/07/16 02:40:53
Adam to Red_Horse 2012/07/16 02:42:47

+1
That is a vote out of fear, now my next statement to you will depend on whether you are a christian or not.

Christians are not suppose to make decisions based on the fear of what man can do.

reply
Red_Horse to Adam 2012/07/16 03:16:49 (edited)
Adam to Red_Horse 2012/07/16 03:36:33

+1
I already see civil war on the horizon over this. But needless to say because I am not to fear man I cannot I repeat cannot vote for one man based on the fear of another man or what that man might do.

reply
Red_Horse to Adam 2012/07/16 04:42:10
Adam to Red_Horse 2012/07/16 03:38:07

+1
Oh I forgot to mention, I will have my master's in physics on August 12.

reply
Red_Horse to Adam 2012/07/16 04:42:39
Tee Quake 2012/07/16 02:04:52

+4
He likes dogs.

reply
zbacku to Tee Quake 2012/07/16 02:14:58

+2
He sure doesn't eat them.

reply
Kat 2012/07/16 02:04:26 (edited)

+5
Mitt Romney has money, he knows how to make money, save money and how to spend money wisely.

reply
Adam to Kat 2012/07/16 02:10:26

+1
So he can run a business. The presidency is a lot more than a business. Also in a business the he is working for specific cliental where his duty is to make money. This cliental is his boss. Who is the president really going to be working for when he gets there. Does he believe he made it due to the people voting him or did he believe he got in by buy the votes with all the campaign money he has. In essence where is his allegiance going to lie.

reply
zbacku to Adam 2012/07/16 02:14:32

+1
Well, you said not to mention Obama, but he is destroying our economy because he knows NOTHING about business.

reply
Adam to zbacku 2012/07/16 02:30:25

Whether a business is successful is dependent on whether the business accomplishes its goals. What will be Mitt's goals when he gets there (NOT OURS) and where will it come from.

reply
Stryder to Adam 2012/07/16 02:14:50

+3
Yes, but he's proven he knows economics. Unlike the trainwreck we have in office now.

reply
Adam to Stryder 2012/07/16 02:31:44

ok, yes he knows economics, will economics be his most important thing when he gets there? The presidency is not a business there for he does not need to make money to keep his job, not to mention he will have a definite 4 year contract that can't be negated.

reply
Red_Horse to Adam 2012/07/16 02:18:08
Adam to Red_Horse 2012/07/16 02:32:50

+1
Ok now so far you have had the best answer. But because I have listened and read so much I know Romney to well to say I am taking a blind chance.

reply
Red_Horse to Adam 2012/07/16 02:36:27
Adam to Red_Horse 2012/07/16 02:40:26

+1
The people creating this nation, that took a huge risk, did not take that risk blindly.

reply
Red_Horse to Adam 2012/07/16 03:02:19 (edited)
Kat to Adam 2012/07/16 02:19:21

+1
Well you said without mentioning Obama, most answers would need to. Running it like a business would be better than running it like a hall of mirrors where nothing is as it seems like the current people.
Businesses work for their customers, if the customer isn't happy you aren't going to succeed, the American people would be the customers. Businesses are used to dealing with a wide clientele and can usually communicate effectively with representatives of other companies and governments.
I haven't seen one plausible piece of evidence to say he wouldn't represent the American People. I have seen plenty from the current admin.

reply
Adam to Kat 2012/07/16 02:37:46

+1
The way I stated my words was on purpose. I did not say don't mention Obama but said without saying anything about Obama. Which means in more specific terms:
1) don't mention Obama.
2) don't mention anything related to Obama.
3) don't mention anything that could be an answer that is linked to Obama for reasoning.

Presidency working for its customers. The question then becomes who are his customers: the people, or who campaign donors, or his associates, or the republican party establishment power.

reply
Kat to Adam 2012/07/16 02:44:44

Refer to 1) Let's not become a part of the circle jerk shall we.

I did not say don't mention Obama but said without saying anything about Obama. Which means in more specific terms:
1) don't mention Obama.

reply