9/11 conspiracy theories revisited
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
2012/09/10 18:25:43
|
|
|||||
|
33 votes
|
|
22% | ||
|
32 votes
|
|
21% | ||
|
13 votes
|
|
9% | ||
|
2 votes
|
|
1% | ||
|
13 votes
|
|
9% | ||
|
6 votes
|
|
4% | ||
|
3 votes
|
|
2% | ||
|
49 votes
|
|
32% | ||
Tomorrow we observe the eleventh anniversary of 9/11. And it's time to look again at the 9/11 conspiracy theories.
Why are these theories still current? Because the government failed to investigate the collapses of those buildings as thoroughly as they would have, had this incident been an "ordinary accident." And because the first political party to entertain those theories, i.e. the Democratic Party, abruptly abandoned them the instant they got The Power.
You have pro and con on these theories everywhere. But you rarely get a side-by-side of conventional-v-alternative explanation.
This video is one of those rare things: a sit-down debate between 9/11 conspiracy theory proponents and opponents. The linked article has several more videos, plus links to the most comprehensive sites, pro and con, that have useful information.
So here's a time to weigh in: just what *did* happen on 9/11, eleven years ago?
Why are these theories still current? Because the government failed to investigate the collapses of those buildings as thoroughly as they would have, had this incident been an "ordinary accident." And because the first political party to entertain those theories, i.e. the Democratic Party, abruptly abandoned them the instant they got The Power.
You have pro and con on these theories everywhere. But you rarely get a side-by-side of conventional-v-alternative explanation.
This video is one of those rare things: a sit-down debate between 9/11 conspiracy theory proponents and opponents. The linked article has several more videos, plus links to the most comprehensive sites, pro and con, that have useful information.
So here's a time to weigh in: just what *did* happen on 9/11, eleven years ago?
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/09/10...
Top Opinion
-
ConLibFraud 2012/09/10 22:51:16I don't know who flew those planes into those buildings, but something doesn'...
+12I don't need a confrontation or phucking debate with dumbed down non thinking brain dead programmed slaves who can watch a building being imploded and deny what they are seeing. And those same slaves don't have the ability to watch this video because they are cowards ....
Eh? What airplanes?
For those who do not wish to believe that our government is so corrupt and would never do such a heinous act, might I suggest pulling your head out of the sand.
There are many who have eyes but do not see, who have ears but do not hear.
In America we have Masonic CTs over the Founding. The Maine CT, that America sank it's own Battleship to start the Spanish-American war. FDR and his Military Leadership have been accused of knowing the Empire of Japan would attack in the Pacific, and refusing to stop it with the intent of entering WWII in order to save both great Britain and the USSR.
We Have the Lincoln and Kennedy assinations, and the Gulf of Tonkin insident as well as the USS Pueblo insident. Whenever every "I" is not dotted or "T' crossed a CT rises up. And the truth of that is that CT's arise because there are unanswered questions, some of which can never be answered.
Wheither the US Government, or Agencys of it, knew anything at all the simple truth is that the fault lays at the feet of those who were or had been in power and had allowed our laws to slip and remain un-enforced. Osama Bin Laudin claimed guilt for planning and execusion of the attack, but much evidence remains that shows a Government refusing to enforce its laws allowed the training, and the attackers freedom to carry it out.
Overwhelming circumstantial evidence led many to believe FDR had set up our fleet at Pearl and forced the Japanese to attack as a backdoor to the European war. Some of the evidence was the breaking of the Japanese diplomatic code that let our government know they were planning to break off relations at just the right time for a dawn attack at Pearl. Of course, not properly interpreting that info could be excused to error, but documents declassified 50 years later showed we'd also broken the military code and had been monitoring the Japanese intentions for some time.
It will probably be 50 years before the documents are released that prove Bush or his handlers were behind the attack to get us into war in the Middle East.
The one thing about any real CT is that they can be neither proved nor disproved. There is always just enough ambiguity in the evidence to allow most anyone to interpret it as they please.
Facts are not always recorded, and things that never occured never are recorded.
Much of this he collected himself. He'd been a Conspiracy Watcher most of his adult life. Much he inherited from a Philadelphia woman, one of the original America First Committee, who had been a Watcher much of her life.
Only crazy kooks like myself believe in the conspiracy theory of history, but only the most willfully ignorant fool could have come out of that basement still believing in the “Accidental,” “Stupidity,” or “Darwinian Natural Evolution” theories of history. The only hope I see f...
Much of this he collected himself. He'd been a Conspiracy Watcher most of his adult life. Much he inherited from a Philadelphia woman, one of the original America First Committee, who had been a Watcher much of her life.
Only crazy kooks like myself believe in the conspiracy theory of history, but only the most willfully ignorant fool could have come out of that basement still believing in the “Accidental,” “Stupidity,” or “Darwinian Natural Evolution” theories of history. The only hope I see for mankind to avoid the deepest and darkest “New Age” that's “Dawning” is that there are more than one conspiracy working together to enslave us and that they, when they see the pie coming out of the oven, will tear each other apart for the biggest slice.
Of course, I can't “prove” it (well, I probably could if I had the time and ambition), but I think a lot more is recorded than gets into the “history” books. I think a lot of things do get in that never occurred. For example, as has been pointed out by \IV/ in Sodahead, a small group of young Arab men, who loved women, alcohol, and money, were persuaded and directed by a sick old man hiding in a cave in Afghanistan to give their lives for a religious cause. That's what will likely be recorded in the history books. It already has.
In the end truth does not matter, even if it can be documented, because each person with the time and intelligence to read all of that information will decide for themselves What they will believe. All we know of history some one first decided should be preserved, and of that, only what survived the centurys between.
Or, in a way, one persons joy is anothers misery.
Even so, someone is always possitive that they can bury a truth or make a lie stand. I just think neither can last for long today. The facts coming out about Bengazie being a case in point.
Only a desperate fool will play with those odds. And yes, there are plenty of those to be found.
He was actually a nationalist, but in one of the first American political dirty tricks, the nationalists usurped the name Federalist because they knew most people wanted a federation of the States. They were then able to label their opposition "Anti-Federalists.
If I have time later, I'll find the ebook I have and quote the pertinent parts.
Please send me a message when you do find the title of that book. Hopefully I can get it on my Kindle.
I fully believe muslims did hijack the planes. Flew them into buildings. Beyond that I am not sure of anything. For sure things do not add up.
http://www.godlikeproductions...
facebook.com:PSYCHOLOGY EXPERTS SPEAK OUT: "WHY IS THE 9/11 EVIDENCE DIFFICULT FOR SOME TO ACCEPT?"
It’s often difficult for people who are aware of the evidence for the controlled demolition of the WTC skyscrapers to understand why so many Americans are unwilling to rationally discuss this vital information. For over ten years now, 9/11 Truth advocates have been trying to get relatives, friends, and strangers to listen to the undeniable facts that point to the need for a real 9/11 investigation.
We often encounter emotional resistance, which poses the question: “Why is the evidence so difficult for so many people to accept?”
Licensed clinical psychologist Robert Hopper, Ph.D., explains: “9/11 Truth challenges some of our most fundamental beliefs about our government and about our country. When beliefs are challenged or when two beliefs are inconsistent, cognitive dissonance is created. 9/11 Truth challenges [our] beliefs that our country protects and keeps us safe and that America is the ‘good guy.’ When this happens, fear and anxiety are created. In response, our psychological defenses kick in [to] protect us from these emotions. Denial, which is probably the most primitive psychological defense, is the one most likely to kick in when our beliefs are challenged.”