Quantcast

90% of Meat Samples Contained Fecal Bacteria

Muskoka 2012/03/24 14:16:58



The most recent NARMS retail meat report
stated 90 percent of pork chops, ground beef and ground turkey, and 95
percent of chicken breasts, were contaminated with fecal bacteria.
Their results are based on tests of 5,280 samples. Eleven states bought
about 40 samples each month, with 10 each of chicken breasts, ground
turkey, ground beef, and pork chops. Each of the state labs ran tests
for various bacteria in the meat samples.


Enterococcus isolates (both susceptible and resistant) were found on
95.4 percent of chicken breasts, 90.7 percent of ground turkey, 90.2
percent of ground beef, and 88.3 percent of pork chops. Nearly 78
percent of chicken breasts had E. coli, as did 80 percent of ground
turkey, 58 percent of ground beef and 39 percent of pork chops.


There are 17 Enterococcus species but only a few cause clinical infections in humans.


One of the peculiar assumptions of carnism, the meat-eating belief
system, is that it is healthy, but is eating fecal bacteria regularly a
healthy practice?


Another fascinating bit of information is that burgers from fast-food
restaurants sometimes don’t contain much that would normally be called
meat: “researchers discovered waste and by-products including connective
tissue, nerve tissue, cartilage, bone, and in a quarter of the samples,
Sarcocystis parasites. But surely these fillers were the minority,
right? Unfortunately not. After crunching the numbers, the researchers
found that the amount of actual meat (muscle flesh) in the burgers
ranged from 2.1 percent to 14.8 percent.” (Source: Huffington Post)


If many meat products contain fecal bacteria,
and most consumers are unaware of this probability, and they are
unaware of what they are eating when they purchase fast-food burgers and
hot dogs, the main issue must be the lack of consumer awareness. Why
would people eat things that don’t know anything about though?


Is it laziness, habit, groupthink, herd behavior, effects of mass
media advertising, lack of culpability and transparency for food
providers, or some combination of all of the above? The trend can
clearly be described as unhealthy due to the prevalence of heart disease
and obesity in America.


The NARMS retail meat surveillance program is a joint effort of the
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, and the health departments of 11 states. You can read
the whole report on the FDA site.



Read More: http://www.care2.com/greenliving/90-of-meat-sample...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • DemonChild 2012/03/26 02:41:37
    DemonChild
    True they do, but the FDA doesn't approve of organic, old-fashioned farms!
  • Muskoka DemonChild 2012/03/27 00:35:16
    Muskoka
    This was about RETAIL SALE PRODUCTS, not organic and old fashioned farms.
  • ed 2012/03/25 00:06:50
    ed
    and where are those inspectors?
  • Muskoka ed 2012/03/25 00:12:44
    Muskoka
    +1
    out to lunch.
  • ed Muskoka 2012/03/25 00:25:09
    ed
    +1
    it figures
  • Picasso's Cat 2012/03/24 15:29:14
    Picasso's Cat
    +2
    Hell, fecal matter aside, if you ever went through one of those processing plants and viewed how they operate, you would never eat any meat again.
    That's why you won't find tours in those plants, because they are so grose to watch, and the sanitation standards are mind boggling to see!
    So grab your fishing pole and get your own meat, "fish", then at least you know what you got is fresh, and no one took a dump on it on the way to your dinner plate!

    eat fish  not furr and feathers
  • lm1b2 2012/03/24 14:43:05
    lm1b2
    +1
    Thats because the Federal government does not have enough inspectors to inspect all of the Slaughter Houses,and never has! Congress has never given the FDA enough money,or authority to do their job!

News & Politics

2013/05/25 14:18:23

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals