55 MPG is Going to Cost Us
This will be third time, actually.
The first time was back in the late 1970s, when Chrysler rolled over
like a mortally wounded battleship – to a great extent because it wasn’t
able to turn a profit selling the cars it had anticipated the market would want – but was stuck trying to sell cars the government told Chrysler it wanted. Cars that met the first round of federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)
standards, which stipulated 27.5 MPG at a time when the typical
American car was as large as the current-era’s largest cars, with a big
V-8 under the hood instead of something Toyota Corolla-sized, with a
four under the hood. The Japanese at that time made nothing but
small, four-cylinder cars – so Uncle handed Toyota, Datsun (Nissan now)
and Honda an artificial leg up in the market – while kicking Chrysler, et al, in the soft parts.
It’s true the American cars of that time were not of primo quality.
And it’s true the first round of Japanese imports were also just good
little cars that sold on the merits. But it’s also just as true that
CAFE imposed ruinous costs on the domestics, who were forced to
prematurely retire entire vehicle platforms (and engines) long before
the investment in designing, tooling and so on had been amortized (paid
off) over the course of these vehicles’ otherwise natural life cycle. It
almost killed Chrysler – which was (and still is) the weakest of the
Big Three, with fewer resources to fall back on. But it also hurt GM and
Arguably, they never fully recovered – and staggered through the ’80s
and into the ’90s, with too many brands (GM, especially) and a business
model that didn’t mesh with the realities of the market – the government manipulated
market. CAFE – the original law – provided an artificial incentive to
mass produce the kinds of vehicles GM, Ford and Chrysler had been
building back in the ’70s – big, heavy, with powerful V-8s – only now
they rode higher off the ground and were marketed as “SUVs” – which were
not required to meet the (much stricter) 27.5 MPG CAFE standard for passenger cars.
For “light trucks, the CAFE standard was 22.5 MPG. But when the real
estate bubble popped and Wall Street collapsed in ’08 and gas prices
suddenly soared to $4 a gallon, GM, Ford and Chrysler were left holding
Actually, American taxpayers were left holding the bag – for
the subsequent bail-out of these “too big to fail” companies, who found
themselves in the economically impossible position of trying to please
their customers and placate the government at the same time –
and turn a profit doing it. This dynamic has been getting worse and
worse ever since the first major interferences in the car market
happened in the late 1960s.
Well, the stage has been set for what may prove to be the final
implosion of the car industry. Caesar – oops, President Obama – has
“finalized” his decision that CAFE will be upticked from the merely
outrageous (by economic and engineering standards) 35.5 MPG in 2016 to
the economically catastrophic 55 MPG – average – by model year 2025. (See here for Ca
The Great Law Giver – who apparently also holds the title of Chief
Engineer – saith this will “save Americans $8,000 a year.” He does not
telleth them, of course, what it will cost.
There are exactly two 2013 model non-hybrid cars on the market that
meet – just barely, or not quite – the pending 35.5 MPG CAFE edict that
goes into effect only three years from now (and that’s only two short model years from now): The Scion iQ (37 MPG; see here
for an in-depth story about it ) and the Smart car (36 MPG). They are
microscopic in size – the iQ, all of ten feet long, end to end; the
Smart having room for just two people.
These cars – call them Obama Cars – are the kinds of cars all of us can expect to be driving within the next few years.
Oh, there are also hybrids like the Toyota Prius. But while the 2013
Prius does manage to pass the 2016 bar of 35.5 MPG, even it falls well
short of averaging 55 MPG. The Chevy Volt electric car easily passes
muster on CAFE – but it also costs $40,000.
And the rest? Into the crusher they go. Visualize, if you can, the
fallout that will attend the premature obsolescence by government fiat
of not just a handful of car types but of 90-plus percent of the car
models on sale right now. Almost every 2013 model year vehicle you can
name (including every truck) is destined for either a major
refit/overhaul years before it would otherwise have happened – or
outright cancellation. There is no other way. Perhaps Augustus does not
realize this, but one cannot simply decree, make it so.
Well, one can so decree. But it won’t be free.
Cars that average 35.5 MPG (and 55 MPG) are certainly possible from a
technological/engineering standpoint. But there will be costs. Tremendous
costs. There will be costs associated with the engineering R&D;
necessary to achieve this. There will be costs in the form of eating the
ruinous losses that will attend the mass early retirement of virtually
every type of vehicle currently in production. There will be costs in
the form of reduced crashworthiness (as cars are made lighter to try to
make them more fuel efficient) and performance – or both, as the car
companies try to satisfy conflicting – and to a great extent,
irreconcilable – requirements. And of course, there will costs in the
form of diminished choices for consumers – and at their unwilling
A car can be very economical. Or it can be inexpensive. Or it can
deliver good performance. Or it can be very safe. It is very hard – if
not impossible – for it to be all these things at once.
Someone is going to have to pay for Caesar’s 35.5 MPG car – and then his 55 MPG car.
Whom do you suppose that will be?
That’s right. As consumers, we’ll “save” $8,000 on gas. But we’ll also probably pay at least $8,000 more for the car itself. New technologies don’t just pop into existence, notwithstanding the endlessly arrogant conceit of the imperator.
They have to be conceived, designed and engineered. This requires some
money, usually. And it will require especially clever – and very likely,
not-free – engineering to reconcile the demand for a 55 MPG car that’s also a reasonably safe car. One that passes muster with Caesar, that is.
A 2013 Prius costs $24,000 to start. Do you suppose, with all the
costs discussed above folded in, plus inflation, that the Future 55 MPG
Prius will cost the same? Or is it reasonable to expect it will cost more.
Probably, it will cost a great deal more.
What will happen when buyers decline to buy – because they can no longer afford?
Ah yes, my little chickadee. Then, as taxpayers, we will
pay. We will pay either in the form of grotesque subsidies (a preview
being the $40,000 GM Volt and the $32,000 Nissan Leaf, each of which
transfers a $7,500 per car bar tab to the American taxpayer) or we will
pay to bail out the automakers when they capsize yet again. Which is sure to happen when they start offering up the $30,000-plus “economy” cars decreed by the gilded one.
Is it not magnificent? Is he not great?
Throw it in the woods?
News & Politics