5 Reasons Why Obamacare is in FACT Unconstitutional, Despite the SCOTUS Decision
brtndr
2012/06/29 17:32:30
6/29/12
Now, you're probably saying to yourselves, "HEY, who is this guy to tell the lawmakers and the Supreme Court that they're wrong on the Constitutionality of the Affordable Health Care Act? No one elected him to represent any state or district!! He doesn't sit on a bench wearing a black robe while listening to complex legal arguments!! Who does this guy think he is??"
All true, I don't have a law degree or even studied law in college, but it doesn't matter when you have a general working knowledge of the Constitution. A 5 year old could explain to John Roberts, and the rest of the Supreme Court, why the Affordable Healthcare Act is SOOOO, UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
1. The Obamacare individual Mandate is a direct tax which is unconstitutional under Article 1 section 9:
No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.
2. It violates State's right since the Federal Government does not have the Constitutional Authority to take over Healthcare as stated in the 10th Amendment outlined in the Bill of Rights.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
3. This mandate is involuntary servitude or slavery to the big banks and the insurance industries.The 13 Amendment states:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
4. It benefits certain industries in a crony capitalist or a monopoly system is illegal in the Constitution under Article 1 section 8:
No Preference shall be given any Regulation or Commerce or Revenue to ports of one State over another; nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.
5. Justice Kagan is not supposed to hear this case because of conflict of interest. The reason is; she was apart of drafting and passing the Affordable Healthcare Act. State Attorney's could, and should, invalidate the SCOTUS ruling on Obamacare on the bases the Kagan didn't recuse herself as the law prescribes.
Like I said at the top of this article, "I don't got one of those fancy black robes or law degrees" But, as you can see, it doesn't take much of an education to understand how the Affordable Healthcare Act is in fact "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" when you can read something, including the Constitution, and actually understand the words that you're reading.
Read More: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitu...
Top Opinion
-
mich52 2012/06/29 19:54:26
+15You can make up any facts that you'd like we already know that Conservatives don't understand what facts really are.. Whether its stupidity or ignorance on Conservatives part ObamaCare is Constitutional.. I suggest you get a life and stop being a useless member of society....
In order for Justice Roberts to do the "Right Thing" he has to have legal Constitutional grounds (and the other 4 Judges) that the Affordable Care Act is permitted by the Constitution. As I have pointed out in this posting, and in many replies to my posting, the 5 Judges have ignored several Articles, Sections and Clauses to the Constitution, along with a few amendments to the Bill of Rights that clearly state, why the ACA is in fact unconstitutional.
Your reply is more in the nature of, a personal opinion, rather than a legal argument of Constitutional Law as to why the SCOTUS decision was the right one. On that note, let me answer with......
Justice Roberts and Mitt Romney don't represent my views. I never supported them and never will. While I do agree that the Republic Party has a lot of Neo-Cons in conservative clothing at the top. However, there are a few Republicans in the Senate and House's in the State and Federal government that do represent the actual principals of a Constitutional Republic that conservatives are supposed to support, but keep getting bamboozled by these fake conservative Neo-Cons that the establishment Rhino Party keeps promoting.
Unfortunately, the Democratic Party does the same, an...
In order for Justice Roberts to do the "Right Thing" he has to have legal Constitutional grounds (and the other 4 Judges) that the Affordable Care Act is permitted by the Constitution. As I have pointed out in this posting, and in many replies to my posting, the 5 Judges have ignored several Articles, Sections and Clauses to the Constitution, along with a few amendments to the Bill of Rights that clearly state, why the ACA is in fact unconstitutional.
Your reply is more in the nature of, a personal opinion, rather than a legal argument of Constitutional Law as to why the SCOTUS decision was the right one. On that note, let me answer with......
Justice Roberts and Mitt Romney don't represent my views. I never supported them and never will. While I do agree that the Republic Party has a lot of Neo-Cons in conservative clothing at the top. However, there are a few Republicans in the Senate and House's in the State and Federal government that do represent the actual principals of a Constitutional Republic that conservatives are supposed to support, but keep getting bamboozled by these fake conservative Neo-Cons that the establishment Rhino Party keeps promoting.
Unfortunately, the Democratic Party does the same, and supporters on the left are just as Bamboozled by the leaders of their party, as the conservatives are on the right. I would support a Democratic candidate if I thought they would protect my rights and liberty's as an individual that the Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights and the Constitution recognizes, and is designed to protect.
But, when we have 97 Senators passing the NDAA, and a Democratic President signing the bill, that gives the government the legal protection to secretly arrest, imprison and torture citizens on the mere "suspicion" of being a terrorist, and held indefinitely without any access to legal representation.
When you have a Republican President establishing a TSA goon squad at airports harassing everyone, then expanded with a Democratic president to include Full Naked Body Scanners and groping peoples private parts. Then I'm done with both parties. But, I do believe that the principles of the Republican Party is the eventual way out of this ever increasing Police State and endless foreign wars.
And, when you have both Republican and Democratic administration shipping guns south of the border that ends killing thousands of Mexicans and American ICE and Border agents. And, the DOJ and White House try to cover it up by exercising Executive Privileged. Then, I'm switching my vote to Independent candidate Gary Johnson this November.
That's my personal opinion on the subject.
NOPE, what I'm arguing is that there are quite a few Articles, Sections and Clauses to the Constitution and Amendments to the Bill of Rights that clearly state why the SCOTUS ruling on the Affordable Care Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Despite their phenomenal encyclopedic knowledge of Constitutional Law. A 5 year old with a general working knowledge of the Constitution and Bill of Rights can see how the Affordable Care Act is in fact Unconstitutional.
If Britain’s fascist/corporatist healthcare system is a benchmark for what we can expect from the Affordable Care Act? Then you can expect the same as Britain's version of Universal Affordable Health Care.
And, you'll be paying the mega rich 1% of insurance companies that are owned, and controlled, by the 1% of the mega-rich private international banks like Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs for your loving Liverpool Care Pathways healthcare. (Congratulations)
If you are for this disgusting law. Then you certainly are looking for a handout so you spare me....Dude
"Please master Obie! I need healthcare. I am to stupid to take care of myself."
Showing people who were no doubt payed to hold signs is not impressive.
You are acting like ...
But since you are so concerned about Romnies Great Great GrandFather. Why arn't you concerned about Obama's Father Obama Opiyo, had five wives, including two who were sisters. His grandfather, Hussein Onyango, had at least four wives ...Oh the hypocrisy
http://www.thegatewaypundit.c...
The President only meet his father a few times and was raised by his mother and her side of the family .... just knock it off or just admit it ... you are afraid of the African American President.
Typical, going for the race card when the argument is lost.
And continue to let the insurance companies screw over the republicans as they want to. I think the republicans should be dropped from their insurance if they get ill, or be denied insurance for pre existing conditions, etc. And just plain not have them worry about this bill at all.
Vote GOP, good luck with your health. Vote Dem and you can live, by a bill that regulates the crooked insurance companies and allows you to be treated fairly. Make a choice... GOP or DEM?
I also think all the tea baggers should lose their medicaid, medicare, food stamps and vets benefits. Cut all these peoples taxes... cut them from the programs too... and let's just have an experiment.
But I am sure you feel all Cons deserve to die a horrable death, so tha you can help spead peace love and happiness thooughout the land of shepple.
You post shows the true mentalitly of a liberal, agree with me or die, as an american you don't have the right to disagree with any thought a liberal has.