10 Reasons to BAN GAY Marriage.......
|
|
|||||
|
4 votes
|
|
19% | ||
|
14 votes
|
|
67% | ||
|
3 votes
|
|
14% | ||
1) Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester and air conditioning.
2) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.
3) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.
4) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn’t changed at all like many of the principles on which this great country was founded; women are still property, blacks still can’t marry whites, and divorce is still illegal.
5) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of marriages like Britney Spears’ would be destroyed.
6) The only valid marriages are those which produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn’t be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren’t full yet, and the world needs more children.
7) Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.
8) Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That’s why we have only one religion in America.
9) Children can never succeed without both a male and a female role model at home. That’s why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.
10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven’t adapted to cars, the service-sector economy or longer life spans.
Top Opinion
-
We should allow homosexuals to marry whom they wish....
+3If you don't like gay marriage than don't go to a gay wedding. Don't do a gay person's taxes.... Other than that, you won't know who is married and who is just shaking up.
Besides.....I could have sworn that marriage was about love....NOT just sex.
"because sexual deviance is wrong"
Which is your reason why gays should not get married. So if that holds true then heterosexual couples who partake in sexual deviance in the same sense should not be allowed to marry.
If you make a statement you have to deal with the logical outcome of what you say.
However you still have dodged the other half of my argument. If heterosexual couples have deviant sex just the same as homosexuals. Then according to what you are saying, they have no right to be married.
Because.........deviant sex is WRONG! Which is your point on why homosexuals cannot be married. Thus, neither should heterosexual couples who do the same acts as homosexuals.
One: Marriage has NOTHING to do with having sex. It's about two people who share a relationship of love, trust, devotion and desire to be with each other on a plane beyond just SEX.
" The idea that heteros participating in deviant acts would require evidence that they are participating in such deviant acts"
Then I would ask you to provide evidence of a married homosexual couples committing deviant acts. The fact is, swingers, couples who enjoy anal sex, couples who hold multiple marriages with polygamy ALL contribute to DEVIANT sex. Thus, according to you, should not be allowed to marry.
Second.
"Without heterosexual sex people would not be able to be here."
Your statement is not entirely true. You seem to forget that their are many married couples that cannot conceive children. What of them? Secondly we can now allow a women to carry a child to full birth through a test tube. So once again SEX is does not even have to be an option.
As a matter of fact. I would go so far as to say, that couples who cannot have children. Then interact with each other sexually without intent to create new life are inadequate candidates to be married. Seeming that their sex lives are purely DEVIANT and only derives from pleasure.
I mean honestly, homosexual sex is derived from pleasure, wi...
One: Marriage has NOTHING to do with having sex. It's about two people who share a relationship of love, trust, devotion and desire to be with each other on a plane beyond just SEX.
" The idea that heteros participating in deviant acts would require evidence that they are participating in such deviant acts"
Then I would ask you to provide evidence of a married homosexual couples committing deviant acts. The fact is, swingers, couples who enjoy anal sex, couples who hold multiple marriages with polygamy ALL contribute to DEVIANT sex. Thus, according to you, should not be allowed to marry.
Second.
"Without heterosexual sex people would not be able to be here."
Your statement is not entirely true. You seem to forget that their are many married couples that cannot conceive children. What of them? Secondly we can now allow a women to carry a child to full birth through a test tube. So once again SEX is does not even have to be an option.
As a matter of fact. I would go so far as to say, that couples who cannot have children. Then interact with each other sexually without intent to create new life are inadequate candidates to be married. Seeming that their sex lives are purely DEVIANT and only derives from pleasure.
I mean honestly, homosexual sex is derived from pleasure, without the intent of creating new life, RIGHT!?
I hope you do see the slippery slope you are walking on, be careful not to fall on your face.
"The fact that homosexuality is a sexually deviant act just as pedophilia is a sexual deviant act"
Comparing homosexuals to pedophiles or necrophilia is an ignorant argument, secondly, your statement is not a FACT it's your opinion.
Pedophilia involves seducing minors or all out rape on unsuspecting Children, there are mental repercussions of having a child that has been sexually abused. Homosexuals are two damn consenting adults. So drop this ridiculous argument. Oh and as far as necrophilia, you still don't have two consenting adults. One dead, one alive.
The other side of the coin is, that the same acts that homosexuals commit, heterosexuals can do the exact same acts.
"The fact that homosexuality is a sexually deviant act"
If someone says that they are a heterosexual only means they are ATTRACTED to the opposite sex. Homosexual, attracted to the same sex. As I pointed out above, heterosexuals can perform the EXACT same acts homosexuals perform, which you call deviant. So another ignorant point.
"Actually my statement is entirely true, because PRIOR to current modern science sex was required to procreate and it does take both a male and female to create a child. "
You see what you did there? Prior to...... you defeated your own point. Basically stating that, "We used...
"The fact that homosexuality is a sexually deviant act just as pedophilia is a sexual deviant act"
Comparing homosexuals to pedophiles or necrophilia is an ignorant argument, secondly, your statement is not a FACT it's your opinion.
Pedophilia involves seducing minors or all out rape on unsuspecting Children, there are mental repercussions of having a child that has been sexually abused. Homosexuals are two damn consenting adults. So drop this ridiculous argument. Oh and as far as necrophilia, you still don't have two consenting adults. One dead, one alive.
The other side of the coin is, that the same acts that homosexuals commit, heterosexuals can do the exact same acts.
"The fact that homosexuality is a sexually deviant act"
If someone says that they are a heterosexual only means they are ATTRACTED to the opposite sex. Homosexual, attracted to the same sex. As I pointed out above, heterosexuals can perform the EXACT same acts homosexuals perform, which you call deviant. So another ignorant point.
"Actually my statement is entirely true, because PRIOR to current modern science sex was required to procreate and it does take both a male and female to create a child. "
You see what you did there? Prior to...... you defeated your own point. Basically stating that, "We used to have to rely on sex to procreate."
So your statement is NOT ENTIRELY true. Especially if your going to sit there and say, first, that it is solely dependent on sex, then transform your argument to, it used to have to be that way. So my point still stands. Your statement is not entirely true.
"Also even using modern science it still requires both a male and a female, even if sex is not involved."
This was not my point. My point was sex was not necessary to reproduce. Not that it didn't involve opposite sex's.
"I disagree with you idea since the fact that some couples are unable to procreate merely is a way to help control population. Their life is not Deviant, they are doning nothing that is deviant unlike homosexuals. "
Several things on this one. There is homosexuality found in nature. Which would actually make it a natural phenomenon. I would also argue that it is entirely possible that it is a form of evolutionary population control as well. Just a more natural form of it.
As far as them doing something that isn't deviant, once again. Heterosexual couples can commit the same deviant acts. As well as heterosexual couples that cannot reproduce, neither can homosexual couples. So your two points are counter productive. Another ignorant counter argument.
"I am not on a slippery slope, I merely appreciate the idea of not allowing deviant scum to ruin our nation."
You see, their is a fine line.....a slippery slope as I said before. You sliding right down it. I thought that I was arguing with someone who was just AGAINST homosexuals being married. But with this last statement, you compare people, actual living breathing human beings. That have feelings, love, compassion, minds of their own to SCUM. You are not against it, your just a classic definition of a BIGOT.
You think so highly of yourself to be able to look down on others for what they do with their lives? Your way of life is just absolutely superior to all other forms of life. A form of nihilism. Which, your type of bigotry and nihilism can only be found in one place. Religion. Your profile doesn't say much on your religious persuasion, however you clearly show the classic signs of a religious bigot.
So, good luck with your bigoted ways. Maybe one day, if god does exist you will give birth to a child that is a homosexual. Then you can really live by what you preach. Instead of parroting bigot talking points without any real substance.
You are superior
You are the man
You are just sooo amazing as an individual that I should just listen to your nonsense and just accept it.
Your arguments may work well with people who already think like you. But to others, you come across as an arrogant albeit ignorant person.
Good luck to you and your continued service. But realize that you are fighting for ALL americans, not just the ones you agree with.
Good luck and stay save.
— Christopher Hitchens, God is not Great
If you are wanting it to be left up to churches than you support federal legislation allowing gay marriage. You are even more extreme than me because I feel it should be left up to the states. But go you! Maybe the feds should make the call for all 50 states
That is way more worse than how I imagined the laws... If what your saying is true than the argument about ruining the word marriage is null and void and this argument boils down to gay ppl that are married being discriminated against.
why is it libby you can not show a single law banning gay marriage? oh yes because not a single law bans the marraige of gay couples