Quantcast

0bama's eligibility - even Canada knows our laws better than our own people and legislators!

Annette 2012/03/10 21:02:51
Part of the text from a recent article from Canada Free Press. This should open the eyes of many of the people who still think 0bama is so legal.
"Marco Rubio was born in the US, which makes him a US citizen. His
parents were not US citizens at the time of his birth. Therefore, Marco
Rubio is not a natural born citizen and not eligible for the office of
President or Vice President
.


Although not defined in the Constitution, Article II, Section I,
Clause 5 specifically requires, not just citizenship, but natural born
citizenship
.




The Supreme Court binding precedent in Minor vs. Happersett (1874) provides the Constitutional definition of natural born citizenship.




The Court in Minor did make a direct holding that Mrs. Minor was, in
fact, a US citizen. The Court established her citizenship by defining
the “class” of “natural-born citizens” as those born in the US to
parents who were citizens. The Court included
Virginia Minor in that
class, thereby deeming her to be a US citizen. They did this by
specifically avoiding the 14th Amendment and by specifically construing
Article II Section I, Clause 5
.




When the Court held that Minor was a citizen under Article II Section
I because she was born in the US of citizen parents, that definition
became national law. Therefore, Minor supersedes all other sources on
this point. It is a direct Constitutional interpretation and definition
.




That holding still stands. Minor vs. Happersett has never been superseded. Never.




There is no ambiguity.




The United States is now poised before a crossroads in history.




The Republican Party has a choice, to embrace again a government of
the people, by the people and for the people or choose the path of
political expediency and maintain the corrupt status quo
.




If they choose the former, the American people will overwhelmingly fall in behind them to a Republican victory in 2012.




If the Republican Party chooses the latter, we will stand our ground and fight to take back our government."

Read the rest of the story here. We now have Russia and Canada knowing more than our own citizens about OUR laws. What a disgrace to America!

Obama’s ineligibility: Marco Rubio can’t be President or Vice President - Lawrence Sellin Tuesday, September 20, 2011

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/40510

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Adakin Valorem~PWCM~JLA 2012/03/13 00:58:27
  • Annette Adakin ... 2012/03/13 03:12:11
    Annette
    +1
    The 14th Amendment does not apply to the president. The 2nd Amendment does, and he has to be a "natural born citizen" - born of TWO- got that "2" American citizen parents! Thanks, because people NEED to learn the constitution!
  • Andy 2012/03/12 15:10:39
    Andy
    Why didn't the Dems and Reps vet Obama 4 years ago?? Was there fear of him and Soros at that time??
  • Adakin ... Andy 2012/03/13 00:57:13
    Adakin Valorem~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    Andy, why would the Dems want to vet their 'star-child'? Young, attractive, dynamic...and best of all he "looks BLACK!"

    So what's in it for the Dems to vet someone like that? Why would finding out ANYTHING disparaging be in their best interest? The only Dem that had a vested interest in doing so was the Hillary Team. And guess what? Hillary's vetting originated the whole concept of "Birther"... it was Hillary's researchers that first brought up the possibility that Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama, was not born here. It was Hillary's team that was also slapped down by her own party and cowered back to let others continue their research of the issue.
  • Andy Adakin ... 2012/03/13 03:41:51
    Andy
    +1
    She stopped the process... as she figured she would lose the nomination, and wanted a job in his cabinet... personal interest over the best interest of the USA!!
  • Adakin ... Andy 2012/03/14 00:37:03
    Adakin Valorem~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    also remember that it was Hillary that was the one with the political 'baggage'... not the star-child. It was Hillary that could see the writing on the wall that her history was not going to allow her to move forward within her own party beyond that point for which she had achieved.
  • Andy Adakin ... 2012/03/14 22:10:53
    Andy
    +2
    Like I said...saving her career
  • Annette Andy 2012/03/13 03:13:33
    Annette
    The only one who vetted him was Pelosi, and she signed off on him twice. Nobody challenged her on it, and it is that simple. The States took her word for it.
  • Andy Annette 2012/03/13 03:43:06
    Andy
    +2
    WOW... how many of us trust Pelosi now... oh that's right, never did!!!
  • Annette Andy 2012/03/13 03:14:59
    Annette
    Also, It was Hillary Clinton who first raised the issue of 0bama's ineligibility. It appears they simply bought her off.
  • Andy Annette 2012/03/13 03:48:56
    Andy
    +1
    Can I say... Fraidy Cat
  • Jackie G - Poker Playing Pa... 2012/03/11 16:14:32
    Jackie G - Poker Playing Patriot
    "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

    If the Justice had stopped here, there would be no dispute as to what a "natural born citizen" is and it would have been settled for all time. He did not and continued in the same paragraph with the next sentence as follows:

    " Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts." The case continues as to voting rights for citizens.

    That next sentence (Some authorities.....) obliterates the clean definition of 'natural born' - so, it means we still do not have a clean definition. Because it has never been cleanly defined, even with this SC, no one should be beating the drum of who is or who...

    "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

    If the Justice had stopped here, there would be no dispute as to what a "natural born citizen" is and it would have been settled for all time. He did not and continued in the same paragraph with the next sentence as follows:

    " Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts." The case continues as to voting rights for citizens.

    That next sentence (Some authorities.....) obliterates the clean definition of 'natural born' - so, it means we still do not have a clean definition. Because it has never been cleanly defined, even with this SC, no one should be beating the drum of who is or who is not a natural born citizen

    In order to have a clean deffiniton, Congress would have to make a law and that law would have to stand the test that would surely come . I doubt seriously they ever will.
    (more)
  • Annette Jackie ... 2012/03/11 16:22:14
    Annette
    +2
    I disagree due to the following sentence: "As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first." As to this case there have been doubts- but NEVER to the first. There were also sections of the Minor vs Happerssett case that were scrubbed where it defines even more clearly the indeed, the child of two American citizens is considered "natural born". The person who did the scrubbing couldn't take all of what he would have liked to out of the original document.
  • Jackie ... Annette 2012/03/11 16:30:29
    Jackie G - Poker Playing Patriot
    I understand, but he is saying that there are no doubts about the first to be sure, he is not saying that the other is not correct also, only that there have been doubts. It can mean only one thing: one definition does not stand alone. If it had meant that, it would have said it. If it does not say it, it does not exist and until there is another ruling or a law passed; it remains undefined.
  • Annette Jackie ... 2012/03/11 16:56:34 (edited)
    Annette
    That is was in the scrubbed out portion, and it is the part that is missing, because in that, the statement that natural born means a child born of two citizens of that country is expressly stated.
    See these: http://naturalborncitizen.wor...
    http://beforeitsnews.com/stor...
    There are plenty more of them as well.
  • FairLady 2012/03/11 04:40:50 (edited)
    FairLady
    +5
    I do believe that the legislators do know the laws, but for some mysterious reason don't want to deal with Obama's mob.
  • Annette FairLady 2012/03/11 04:43:37
    Annette
    +5
    That could very well be, and there will be so much work to try to undo everything this jackass has done to date - it is a nightmare to think about.
  • FairLady Annette 2012/03/11 04:46:43
    FairLady
    +4
    Annette, it may take years and probably more than one president to clean up this mess after BO.
  • Annette FairLady 2012/03/11 04:49:22
    Annette
    +3
    No kidding! What a head ache, but this is a migraine that definitely needs to be gotten rid of.
  • FairLady Annette 2012/03/11 04:52:30
    FairLady
    +3
    You got it sweetie. His mob is like cancer tumor that needs to be out ASAP.
  • Annette FairLady 2012/03/11 04:54:19
    Annette
    +2
    I know! - sigh!
  • rockndo... Annette 2012/03/11 09:26:42 (edited)
    rockndoctor
    +1
    If he's removed from the White House everything that has become law becomes null and void. It doesn't exist and didn't exist. Quo Warranto. It's what's been done in the past before BHO that needs to be undone, going all the way back to the 14th amendment. Remember the list I sent you with the items that need to be repealed.
  • Annette rockndo... 2012/03/11 16:23:21
    Annette
    And you're right. It will be one hellacious undertaking, but it really needs to be done.
  • jr 2012/03/11 03:23:23
    jr
    +4
    It is because our media is corrupt and Canada's is not. They do not have the big 0 breathing down their neck
  • rockndo... jr 2012/03/11 09:30:53
    rockndoctor
    +2
    I agree our media is corrupt and it is complicit.
  • Dagon 2012/03/11 02:20:19
  • Beccy 2012/03/11 02:16:51
    Beccy
    +4
    tHE whole world laughs at us because we lack so much knowledge
  • Phyl *I... Beccy 2012/03/11 05:02:39
    Phyl *In God i Trust*
    +1
    I agree with you on that.
  • BUCCANEER~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/03/10 21:13:17
    BUCCANEER~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    +6
    Oh your legislators know the laws all too well,they just value their lives too much!
  • RG BUCCANE... 2012/03/10 23:02:49
    RG
    +6
    Exactly! You said a mouthful there, and true, as we see the threats and bodies pile up over this issue.
  • Annette BUCCANE... 2012/03/11 04:45:06
    Annette
    +2
    I have said that from the beginning - there is something holding many of them hostage somehow, because not all of them can be this complicit with what is going on.
  • rockndo... Annette 2012/03/11 09:20:53
    rockndoctor
    +1
    All the men are complicit because they are all most likely 33 degree Masons, members of the council of foreign relations, and/or bildeberg group. The women are member of the council of foreign relations. Remember the New World Order power structure I sent you.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/07/29 00:50:48

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals