0bama's eligibility - even Canada knows our laws better than our own people and legislators!
"Marco Rubio was born in the US, which makes him a US citizen. His
parents were not US citizens at the time of his birth. Therefore, Marco
Rubio is not a natural born citizen and not eligible for the office of
President or Vice President.
Although not defined in the Constitution, Article II, Section I,
Clause 5 specifically requires, not just citizenship, but natural born
citizenship.
The Supreme Court binding precedent in Minor vs. Happersett (1874) provides the Constitutional definition of natural born citizenship.
The Court in Minor did make a direct holding that Mrs. Minor was, in
fact, a US citizen. The Court established her citizenship by defining
the “class” of “natural-born citizens” as those born in the US to
parents who were citizens. The Court included Virginia Minor in that
class, thereby deeming her to be a US citizen. They did this by
specifically avoiding the 14th Amendment and by specifically construing
Article II Section I, Clause 5.
When the Court held that Minor was a citizen under Article II Section
I because she was born in the US of citizen parents, that definition
became national law. Therefore, Minor supersedes all other sources on
this point. It is a direct Constitutional interpretation and definition.
That holding still stands. Minor vs. Happersett has never been superseded. Never.
There is no ambiguity.
The United States is now poised before a crossroads in history.
The Republican Party has a choice, to embrace again a government of
the people, by the people and for the people or choose the path of
political expediency and maintain the corrupt status quo.
If they choose the former, the American people will overwhelmingly fall in behind them to a Republican victory in 2012.
If the Republican Party chooses the latter, we will stand our ground and fight to take back our government."
Read the rest of the story here. We now have Russia and Canada knowing more than our own citizens about OUR laws. What a disgrace to America!
Obama’s ineligibility: Marco Rubio can’t be President or Vice President - Lawrence Sellin Tuesday, September 20, 2011
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/40510
Top Opinion
-
BUCCANEER~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/03/10 21:13:17
+6Oh your legislators know the laws all too well,they just value their lives too much!
So what's in it for the Dems to vet someone like that? Why would finding out ANYTHING disparaging be in their best interest? The only Dem that had a vested interest in doing so was the Hillary Team. And guess what? Hillary's vetting originated the whole concept of "Birther"... it was Hillary's researchers that first brought up the possibility that Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama, was not born here. It was Hillary's team that was also slapped down by her own party and cowered back to let others continue their research of the issue.
If the Justice had stopped here, there would be no dispute as to what a "natural born citizen" is and it would have been settled for all time. He did not and continued in the same paragraph with the next sentence as follows:
" Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts." The case continues as to voting rights for citizens.
That next sentence (Some authorities.....) obliterates the clean definition of 'natural born' - so, it means we still do not have a clean definition. Because it has never been cleanly defined, even with this SC, no one should be beating the drum of who is or who...
If the Justice had stopped here, there would be no dispute as to what a "natural born citizen" is and it would have been settled for all time. He did not and continued in the same paragraph with the next sentence as follows:
" Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts." The case continues as to voting rights for citizens.
That next sentence (Some authorities.....) obliterates the clean definition of 'natural born' - so, it means we still do not have a clean definition. Because it has never been cleanly defined, even with this SC, no one should be beating the drum of who is or who is not a natural born citizen
In order to have a clean deffiniton, Congress would have to make a law and that law would have to stand the test that would surely come . I doubt seriously they ever will.
See these: http://naturalborncitizen.wor...
http://beforeitsnews.com/stor...
There are plenty more of them as well.