Apr 23, 2008 04:51PM GMTApril 23, 2008 16:51:57
Question • Politics - Other

Question Stats

13 answers
22 comments
raves +4  
Share This Question
If we could shrink the earth's population to a village of precisely 100 people, with all the existing human ratios remaining the same, it would look similar to this:

If we could shrink the earth's population to a village of precisely 100 people, with all the existing human ratios remaining the same, it would look similar to this:?

57 Asians
21 Europeans
14 from the Western Hemisphere
8 Africans

52 would be female
48 would be male

70 would be non-white
30 would be white

70 would be non-Christian
30 would be Christian

89 would be heterosexual
11 would be homosexual

6 people would possess 59% of the entire world's wealth
All 6 would be from the United States

80 would live in substandard housing;
70 would be unable to read
50 would suffer from malnutrition

1 would be near death
1 would be near birth

1 would have a college education
1 would own a computer
Add Image Add Video
resize

* these fields are required to answer

I agree to the SodaHead TOS and Privacy

Loading Loading...
Sort By: Raves | Date Comments
  • raves +1   [-] by Lykos posted Apr 25, 2008 11:49PM GMTApril 25, 2008 23:49:44
    Lykos reply

    Answered Wow. That really puts things in perspective! It made me think...

    moderated...
  • raves     [-] by MadHatter posted Apr 24, 2008 12:01AM GMTApril 24, 2008 00:01:17
    MadHatter reply

    Answered Interesting, but not surprising. It made me think...

    moderated...
  • raves     [-] by Christopher posted Apr 24, 2008 12:16PM GMTApril 24, 2008 12:16:39
    Christopher reply
    hmmm... I wonder how current it is - and how it would/has changed if it isn't. The only thing that makes me think it's more current than 30 years old is the reference to a computer.
  • raves +1   [-] by Lykos posted Apr 25, 2008 11:50PM GMTApril 25, 2008 23:50:36
    Lykos reply
    moderated...
  • raves     [-] by Christopher posted Apr 26, 2008 02:25AM GMTApril 26, 2008 02:25:41
    Christopher reply
    I'm in good company - who are the other 9???
  • raves     [-] by Lykos posted Apr 28, 2008 05:42PM GMTApril 28, 2008 17:42:06 (edited)
    Lykos reply
    moderated...
  • raves     [-] by Smokey posted Apr 23, 2008 11:15PM GMTApril 23, 2008 23:15:37
    Smokey reply

    Answered Whatever. I don't think.

    I would probably be the ruler of the village, and I'd make sure that everyone make love to populate the earth again. Heck, we need someone to pay taxes. :)
  • raves     [-] by Ed© posted Apr 23, 2008 09:02PM GMTApril 23, 2008 21:02:27
    Ed© reply

    Answered Wow. That really puts things in perspective! It made me think...

    I've seen this before at least 5 times in business lol
  • raves +1   [-] by Chartreuse Hussein Dog ~COB posted Apr 23, 2008 07:16PM GMTApril 23, 2008 19:16:49
    Chartreuse Hussein Dog ~COB reply

    Answered Interesting, but not surprising. It made me think...

    We don't fully appreciate what we have, do we?
  • raves +1   [-] by Jackie G posted Apr 23, 2008 05:11PM GMTApril 23, 2008 17:11:00
    Jackie G reply

    Answered Interesting, but not surprising. It made me think...

    - good information. We, in US, rave about everything we do not have adnauseum (not that we are perfection by any stretch) What we rarely think about is how much we have in relationship to the world population; we just want more. I dunno if that is really bad or good - sure makes us push the envelope when it comes to striving for success and gaining possessions. Very interesting!
  • raves +1   [-] by Dave posted Apr 23, 2008 05:05PM GMTApril 23, 2008 17:05:20
    SodaHead is online! Dave reply

    Answered Interesting, but not surprising. It made me think...

    Sure reduce the 545 people who control the 300 million of us down to a manageble size.
  • raves +1 -2 [-] by Jake posted Apr 23, 2008 05:01PM GMTApril 23, 2008 17:01:48
    Jake reply

    Answered Interesting, but not surprising. It made me think...

    to be honest the 11 homos wouldn't last long
  • raves +1   [-] by Christopher posted Apr 23, 2008 05:07PM GMTApril 23, 2008 17:07:07
    Christopher reply
    hateful bigot
  • raves     [-] by Jake posted Apr 23, 2008 05:09PM GMTApril 23, 2008 17:09:20
    Jake reply
    I just mean, from reproduction stand point, they won't
  • raves +1   [-] by Christopher posted Apr 23, 2008 05:12PM GMTApril 23, 2008 17:12:55
    Christopher reply
    ok. Thanks for clarifying. But let me just say that the use of the word "homos" doesn't quite lead the reader in the direction you intended. It's not exactly a "welcoming" term.
  • raves +1   [-] by Chartreuse Hussein Dog ~COB posted Apr 23, 2008 07:12PM GMTApril 23, 2008 19:12:43
    Chartreuse Hussein Dog ~COB reply
    "from reproduction stand point, they won't"??????????????????
    If I'm not mistaken, most homosexuals are the offspring of 2 heterosexual parents.
  • raves     [-] by Christopher posted Apr 23, 2008 07:23PM GMTApril 23, 2008 19:23:09
    Christopher reply
    I was wondering if someone might pick that up!

  • raves +1   [-] by SAM posted Apr 23, 2008 04:57PM GMTApril 23, 2008 16:57:36
    SAM reply

    Answered Wow. That really puts things in perspective! It made me think...

    1 would own a computer?? hmm....
  • raves     [-] by Christopher posted Apr 23, 2008 04:58PM GMTApril 23, 2008 16:58:49
    Christopher reply
    hehehehe .... silly
  • raves     [-] by SAM posted Apr 23, 2008 06:47PM GMTApril 23, 2008 18:47:40
    SAM reply
    What!>? Want to fight for it ;)
  • raves +1   [-] by Christopher posted Apr 23, 2008 07:23PM GMTApril 23, 2008 19:23:56
    Christopher reply
    what I want to know is how does the one person get a college education if no one is qualified to teach
  • raves     [-] by SAM posted Apr 23, 2008 11:07PM GMTApril 23, 2008 23:07:04
    SAM reply
    You are right! I never thought of that!