Oct 12, 2008 06:26PM GMTOctober 12, 2008 18:26:07
Question Entertainment - Other

Question Stats

529 answers
1,118 comments
raves +40 -1
Share This Question

Do you believe in hunting?

Add Image Add Video
resize
Loading Loading...
Top Comment
raves +9   by 1tenthAngel

Answered I...

would only hunt for food...not for pleasure.. hunt food pleasure
view thread
Sort By: Raves | Date 1 2 3 4 ... Next » Last » Comments
  • raves +1   [-] by poicat

    Answered I...

    I believe if you are hunting for food it is right...If it is for "sport" SHAME on those who partake.....
  • raves +1   [-] by ClarissaClaire

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    It's been done for centuries- only know when everything is provided for people- does anyone have a problem with it. If you kill something, however, you better fucking eat it.
  • raves +1   [-] by betz

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    Quite honestly I don't want an overabundance of deer running through my yard. Bring on the ol' tenderloin. I'm hungry!!!!
  • raves +1   [-] by gryphon1

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    We have the responsibility to practice stewardship. Animals are part of the food chain, just as humans are when we venture into their territory. However, hunting and fishing should not just be for sport. I know many people who are so poor hunting is the way they put food on the table. I would never take that away from them.
  • raves +1   [-] by angel (: *PONED*

    Answered I...

    would not huntt.......... but if i were starving yeaaah most definately but i would feel horrible =/
  • raves +1   [-] by Luna

    Answered I...

    I believe in hunting animals for food and people for sport.
  • raves +1   [-] by Jordan

    Answered I...

    depends
  • raves +2   [-] by TransistorQ1

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    Just lead them a little less......
  • raves +2   [-] by LRM

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    But I'm a vegetarian. I don't have a problem with other people hunting if they eat their kill afterward.
  • raves +1   [-] by Hevs

    Answered I...

    If it's done for food and not for sport (ie fox hunting) then I have no issue with it. Shooting an animal to eat it is probably more humane than the current methods used in many slaughter houses to produce your every day hamburger.
  • raves +1   [-] by buddy

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    trying to find out when and how i am going t die
  • raves +2   [-] by mr.crabs

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    if it wasn't for hunting we wouldn't be here
  • raves +1   [-] AntiBush replied to mr.crabs
    guess that all depends on WHAT the person was hunting, eh? :)
  • raves +2   [-] by mckij26

    Answered I...

    I absolutely believe in hunting as a source of food. True hunters are a source of pride for this country.
  • raves +1   [-] by meg

    Answered No, its horrible and unfair.

    but only if you dont need it
  • raves +2   [-] by leeinFairbanksAlaska

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    Hunting is a necessity here in Alaska...moose is one the top meat here in the central and southern part of our state and caribou is the prime meat in the north. That is why the pipeline had to be built a certain way so that they could migrate to their feeding and calving grounds. The native people use every part of the animals, from the head on down..and it is mighty tasty too!! I always said that the original Alaskan were the best fed peoples on earth with the meat we get to the salmon,,yumm..yumm!!
  • raves +2   [-] by Paul Revere

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    Just wait until after the election. If things go the way I think they will, hunting will be a great way to avoid the lines and ration cards.
  • raves +1   [-] by Unfulfilled

    Answered I...

    Humans are much more of an agricultural society than they are hunter-gatherers. I can appreciate our trophic level, but I just don't think hunting comes very natually to developed societies like our own.
  • raves +3   [-] by darpar

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    I don't hunt myself. I don't like guns, but I certainly do not have the right to tell someone else not to do something they enjoy. Several of my family members (male and female) are hunters and go to the upper peninsula every year. They do not always get anything, but really enjoy the opporotunity to just spend the time together.
  • raves +2   [-] by kim

    Answered I...

    I would also hunt just for food. hunt food
  • raves +2   [-] by new mexico

    Answered I...

    I hunt and have hunted all my life, just as my father and grandfathers. We have always hunted for food not horns.Ask may hunters out there if they have a great respect for thier harvest and you will find that they do.I know it is hard for some to believe but there is a certian sadness when the hunt comes to and end, after all it was a life which was ended.That is where the respect comes in to play, from hunter to the hunted.I know a lot of us have a bad rap out there, but the majority of us hunt with respect for not only our prey, but for others and for the conservation of our environment.
  • raves +1   [-] by Rain(Teddy)

    Answered I...

    think its cool only for survivle like not really something to find pleasure in more like something that if you have no choice then it has to be done. And to be honest its not a belife hunting's a right and if given the choice i'd rather not exocise set right ever in life unless it was my only means of getting food. Even then my rule is if its a carnivor dont eat it dont even look at it like its food because its in the same place as you, both are hunters and shouldnt kill and eat hunters. So that means, no sharks, wolves, dogs, whales, squid (is iffy b/c its a predetor but it also food for bigger animals), tiger (yes people eat tigers), ect
  • raves +2   [-] by Josh

    Answered No, its horrible and unfair.

    Personally, I wouldn't like being killed for fun.
  • raves +1   [-] by shamshad

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    as long as is we don't send animals to endangered specieces list and don't harm any body eles'freedom or rights
  • raves +4   [-] by Mrs. V

    Answered I...

    I think some people like game. I know people in Colorado who simply do not buy beef. They hunt elk, deer, and other wild game. Many of these animals must be thinned to prevent overpopulation and disease. Some of these animals have wasting disease and must be tested by the state before they can be consumed. Take black bear for example. Too many will cause them to encroach on human territory, thus making them unafraid of humans. I know it seems cruel. I personally do not hunt, but I have gone with a friend as an observer. Elk are a nuisance to cattle farmers. They break down fences, eat up stores of hay, gore cattle, etc. In Evergreen, Co. it is not uncommon to see a herd of Elk in town.
    Remember, there haven't always been stores and butchers to which you could run to for groceries and meat. Pioneers relies solely on hunting and many like the tradition.
    The hunting party I was with, donated ALL the meat to the poor. The processor in Denver processes for free the meat, then donates to the needy.
    By the Way, Elk tastes a lot like beef or buffalo. And it is very, very lean.
  • raves +4   [-] by OldManMonty

    Answered I...

    Hunting is a part of my life and has been for generations. My children hunt with me. We respect and thank nature for each gift. We waste nothing. We take only what we need, nothing more. We are at our best as a family when we hunt. I can't think of any other activity that does that. Oh yea, I'm a city boy and we have vacationed all over the world and had a ball too. Hunting is serious, somewhat dangerous and it demands all of your attention. Those things keep us clear headed and in touch on a pretty high level. I'm happiest when in the field.
  • raves +3   [-] by outlaw

    Answered I...

    Love to hunt. It is a lot of fun to get into the chase of a deer. They are pretty frigin smart. If I could I would hunt on every continent, and hunt down some really challenging animals. I love it.
  • raves +4   [-] by Peter Quan

    Answered I...

    would only hunt to survive, but if it was to hunt criminals then just pass me a sniper rifle
    hunt survive hunt criminals pass sniper rifle
  • raves +1   [-] by Rod

    Answered I...

    I don't "believe in" hunting! I think it's okay. Not for me though. I'm a city boy. My hunting consists of going to the grocery store, and searching for a good cut of meat! However, I live in a community where hunting is huge source of income. It would be a disaster if people suddenly stopped hunting here.
  • raves +3   [-] by greta1

    Answered I...

    love animals but believe others who hunt with licenses do have the right to hunt.
  • raves +3   [-] by Aj

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    Hunting is classic
  • raves +1   [-] by bo_is_bs

    Answered Yes, we are higher up on the food chain, we have every right to kill animals.

    Vera Baker was purportedly sidelined from her duties after Senator Obama’s wife, Michelle, became convinced that he had developed a personal friendship with her.
    The allegations were initially circulated in August, just two weeks before the convention at which Obama finally beat his opponent for the Democratic Party nomination, Hillary Clinton.
    The woman, now 33, vigorously denies the vicious and unsubstantiated gossip.
    And some Washington insiders suggested that she was the victim of an 11th-hour attempt to smear Obama by die-hard Hillary supporters.
    But now the rumors have resurfaced, suggesting that they may be coming from elements in the Republican Party.
    1) It’s not just a silly little rumor.
    2) It will break in some form shortly. The question is how prestigious an outlet breaks it. (PS, at best, it won’t be that prestigious, at least at first, but there’s a lot here so when someone finally touches, there is a good chance of an Edwards-like “Oh yeah, we were working on that too” pile-on.) Fire is being held as those who know the story try to get someone of import to break it; if they pass, it will be flooded out through secondary channels.
    3) The story has a Fred Baron. Not The Fred Baron. But actually– an even better Fred Baron. The woman is .
    Vera Baker was purportedly sidelined from her duties after Senator Obama’s wife, Michelle, became convinced that he had developed a personal friendship with her.
    The allegations were initially circulated in August, just two weeks before the convention at which Obama finally beat his opponent for the Democratic Party nomination, Hillary Clinton.
    The woman, now 33, vigorously denies the vicious and unsubstantiated gossip.
    And some Washington insiders suggested that she was the victim of an 11th-hour attempt to smear Obama by die-hard Hillary supporters.
    But now the rumors have resurfaced, suggesting that they may be coming from elements in the Republican Party.
    1) It’s not just a silly little rumor.
    2) It will break in some form shortly. The question is how prestigious an outlet breaks it. (PS, at best, it won’t be that prestigious, at least at first, but there’s a lot here so when someone finally touches, there is a good chance of an Edwards-like “Oh yeah, we were working on that too” pile-on.) Fire is being held as those who know the story try to get someone of import to break it; if they pass, it will be flooded out through secondary channels.
    3) The story has a Fred Baron. Not The Fred Baron. But actually– an even better Fred Baron. The woman is “working” in the Caribbean drawing a salary from…. uhhh… let’s say from someone who is a big, shiny part of the dirty Chicago political machine. And it makes no sense that she’s doing her supposed “job,” for which she seems unqualified anyway, in the Caribbean, of all places. It’s unclear how she could possibly do this job at all, never mind from the Caribbean. And she’s been there for at least a year. (At least.) This isn’t some sabbatical or few months’ of “work” on an island paradise.
    4) This woman was a major, big-time fundraiser. She raised x millions of dollars for various Democratic interests (connected to Obama) and then opened her own shop in DC. Since she was (as any fundraiser does) getting a cut of the take, this was a lucrative job. But she, for reasons unfathomable, suddenly shut the shop down and decamped to a little Caribbean island. And somewhere along the line got a “job” from her own Fred Baron. Which conveniently put her far away from Obama, Michelle, and the media.
    5) Within hours of the Daily Mail article breaking, she called the Illinois hq of the Obama campaign. They wouldn’t talk to her.
    Some people in Chicago claim she was Obama’s Finance Director for his 2004 Senate campaign. FEC Senate campaign records show she was paid a pretty penny as “Finance Director”.
    However, people familiar with Obama’s 2004 Senate campaign say Claire Serdiuk was Obama’s Finance Director. Looking through everything we can see online for that 2004 campaign, Claire Serdiuk is consistently listed as the Finance Director - because that’s what she was.
    There’s no mention of Vera Baker…but Vera Baker was paid as the “Finance Director” too.
    And then, suddenly, Vera Baker was relocated to New York.
    Right around the time Michelle Obama got incredibly angry about something. We know it was hard to tell, because Michelle’s angry about something on a good day…but this was EXTRA angry.
    And then, even more suddenly, Vera Baker was relocated to the island of Martinique, where she remains.
    We hear it’s lovely there. They get lots of sunshine on Sundays. Paradise. A lovely place to read between the lines and ask lots of questions. All reporters should go there and feel inspired.
    Does anyone else get the impression the media doesn’t want to report on people like Vera Baker until after the election — and that both the Clinton and McCain campaigns have been unable to force them to do otherwise? Do you ever get the feeling reporters sit around, perhaps on top of piles of stories they choose not to report, asking each other, “You don’t really want McCain to win, do you?”.
    Of course they don’t.
    The piles make better chairs than stories. “We’re all so comfy!”
    That’s why you’ve never heard of Vera Baker…and most likely won’t in the next three weeks.
  • raves +1   [-] by ~brown eyed gurl~