Jun 17, 2008 05:46PM GMTJune 17, 2008 17:46:07
Question Relationships - Other

Question Stats

40 answers
83 comments
raves +6  
Share This Question

Who would Jesus vote for if he was alive today?

I personally see Jesus as a peace loving Hippie.
I think he would be a democrat or not vote at all.
What do you think?
Add Image Add Video
resize
Loading Loading...
Top Comment
raves +4   by irish~AAA~erin go bragh

Answered He would not vote at all

free love!!!
view thread
Sort By: Raves | Date 1 2 3 Next » Last » Comments
  • raves     [-] by TTT

    Answered He would not vote at all

    I would think he would refrain from voting, simply because Jesus is supposed to represent faith, truth and love, and none of our politicians represent either...
  • raves +1   [-] by DocOdeliC

    Answered He would not vote at all

    Jesus was a true anarchist.....
    Anarchy: a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.
    PS He IS alive today- in each and every one of us!
  • raves +1   [-] by Mindlesspartyhack

    Answered He would not vote at all

    First of all, He is alive!
    Second, if He were here now, there wouldn't be an election, since He would be the King.
  • raves +1   [-] by concerned

    Answered He would not vote at all

    he would not vote ...he would teach you the word of god ...
  • raves +1   [-] by (Deep_Thinker)

    Answered He would not vote at all

    Or he would get god to be prez. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GOD!!!!! GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO JESUS!!!!!
  • raves +1   [-] by TxAggie93

    Answered He would not vote at all

    why vote? he already knows the outcome
  • raves +1   [-] by StarrGazerr

    Answered Someone else

    I'm not sure who he would vote for, but I know who he wouldn't...

    vote
  • raves +2   [-] by BabeeRock

    Answered He would not vote at all

    I think Jesus would be more concerned with the Middle East then our country's next President
  • raves +1   [-] Angel replied to BabeeRock
    good answer
  • raves +4   [-] by irish~AAA~erin go bragh

    Answered He would not vote at all

    free love!!!
  • raves +3   [-] by Angel

    Answered Someone else

    Someone that would be perfect for the job...
  • raves +1   [-] by sugarymilk

    Answered He would run for president himself

    not sure about that one
  • raves +1   [-] by bolrog

    Answered He would not vote at all

    moderated...
  • raves +2   [-] by RedFox

    Answered Someone else

    his heavenly father
  • raves +1   [-] by doc

    Answered Someone else

  • raves +1   [-] by Seuskeeper

    Answered Someone else

    He would vote for God.
  • raves +1   [-] by Malibulorie

    Answered He would not vote at all

    I think he would stay home on election day!
  • raves +2   [-] by Daisy

    Answered Someone else

    ron paul

    Ron Paul!
  • raves +4   [-] by Smokey

    Answered Someone else

    He'd VOTE for MANKIND. Didn't he die on the cross for us? Man, what more do people want?
  • raves +3   [-] by ZEKE

    Answered Someone else

    He would not vote... He is not political.... if he had to vote he would for GOD the Father.... vote political vote god father
  • raves +2 -1 [-] by scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule

    Answered Liz this is a blasphemous question!

    Since you don't have "other" for an answer, I have to pick this one. he wouldn't vote for anyone because "he" doesn't exist.:):):)
  • raves +3   [-] Seuskeeper replied to scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule
    I do not like your answer either but how does it fit into one of the downrave reasons?
  • raves +2   [-] scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule replied to Seuskeeper
    Because as soon as my opinion differs from others, especially SOME of these Fanatical Religious Nutjobs it's an automatic DR.:)
  • raves +2   [-] Seuskeeper replied to scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule
    You have a right to believe what you want to believe and the fanatical religious nutjobs as you refer to them also have that same right. I guess I would be classified as a nutjob since I too am a Christian, but I do not intend to force my christianity onto someone.
  • raves +1   [-] scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule replied to Seuskeeper
    Did I refer to you in any Way, shape or form as a "fanatical religious nutjob"?????? I have talked with MANY god fearing/believing people on this site and MOST of them are very considerate to my belief, likewise, I do the same. The one's that can't carry on a conversation without spewing all their babble on how I'm going to Hell because I don't believe in god are the one's I'm referring too.
  • raves +2   [-] Seuskeeper replied to scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule
    No, I was just making sure that I didn't deny my christianity, I know you didn't mean me.
  • raves +1   [-] scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule replied to Seuskeeper
    :)
  • raves +2   [-] irish~AAA~erin go bragh replied to scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule
    oh you should go to the who created god poll then!!! it started out with thoughtful answers and the nut jobs found it and are destroying it!
  • raves +1   [-] scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule replied to irish~AAA~erin go bragh
    I'm not sure if your comment is agreeing with me or being sarcastic???? I apologize, sometimes it's hard to figure out the meaning of what is being said just by reading type.lol:):):)
  • raves +2   [-] irish~AAA~erin go bragh replied to scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule
    i was deadly serious!!!!you would be in your element then(sarcasm) for the last sentence!LOL LOL
  • raves +1   [-] scarecrow-Aus Cattle Dogs rule replied to irish~AAA~erin go bragh
    I've been on quite a few of the god(Notice lower case "g"), that ever