Question Celebrities

Should the court have given Britney Spears back her visitation rights?

raves +15   by OK Magazine
Should the court have given Britney Spears back her visitation rights?
Add Image Add Video
resize

* these fields are required to comment

I agree to the SodaHead TOS and Privacy

Loading Loading...
Top Comment
raves +6   by Bill

Answered You bet!

I think she should at least get supervised visitation with her children.
view thread
Sort By: Raves | Date 1 2 Next » Last » Comments
  • raves     [-] by harleymom4mcr

    Answered Hell to the no!

    If she is not going to clean up her act she does not deserve to see her kids. And it does not look like she is going to. If they let her see them now she will think she does not have to straighten up they will let her see them any way.
  • raves     [-] by jenna

    Answered You bet!

    Despite the media I believe she loves her boys more than anything
  • raves     [-] by imht4u

    Answered You bet!

    She is their mom...and why the heck does he want thoses kids...he does not want his other kids he had with all the other women...I mean really...he is in it for the money, not the love or protection of those kids. He is the one driving Brit to the point of insanity. I think he should never had got the kids...nor should he ever be allowed to go near her or those kids again...HE IS A HORRIBLE, DEAD BEAT DAD THAT IS IN IT FOR THE MONEY AND FAME. LOSER! LOSER! LOSER!
  • raves     [-] by Wendy

    Answered You bet!

    britney isn't the best mom but she is the baby's mom. i don't see the court taking the kids away from other far worse mothers.
  • raves     [-] by Scott

    Answered You bet!

    If she learns to live by the court's guidelines. I know, its hard for her to understand that she has to be like "everyone else".
  • raves +1   [-] by Butch Cassidy

    Answered You bet!

    Abuse is good for children...it builds character.
  • raves +1   [-] by Scott
    Put them on a farm, give em' a good day of ranchin and they be straighter than the fence in the back 40.
  • raves +1   [-] by .[†].alley923.[†].

    Answered You bet!

    It's not realy fair to her,
    i think its a bit mean, just because its her, c'mon wld u like it if u made a few mistakes, then your child/ren were taken away from yooh, THEN you were told yooh cant see them?
    xx
  • raves +1   [-] by jacobtree

    Answered You bet!

    After she goes goes through therapy. Child at this age need a mother and father.
  • raves +1   [-] by matton

    Answered You bet!

    they are her kids
    it is not healthy for the state to step in on family issues.
    the kids minds are effected by this.
    no government in family except as a last resort.
    her family should be kicking her butt!
  • raves +1   [-] by Zero

    Answered Hell to the no!

    Not yet...truly she needs to be evaluated by a doctor first....and counseling second...both should. However as a mother..I cannot even imagine having my children taken away ..from me...this is tragic.
  • raves +1   [-] by Sólrún

    Answered You bet!

    I just feel for her =( She deserves better and I just hope that her life is going to be better and all that =}
  • raves +1   [-] by brady969

    Answered Hell to the no!

    Not until she's been clean for 90 days. Mistakes can also happen with supervision if you are on drugs. It won't kill her or her kids to be away for 90 days...it's for the best!
  • raves +1   [-] by ARMENTHIA

    Answered You bet!

    I would agree with "Supervised" visitation.
  • raves +1   [-] by BearBeaver

    Answered Hell to the no!

    She needs to get help.
  • raves +1   [-] by Arleen

    Answered You bet!

    with court appointed supervision..The children need to know their mother didn't abandon them
  • raves +1   [-] by whatever

    Answered Hell to the no!

    I am afraid that until Britney grows up a bit she should not be around children. As much as I like sneaking a peak at her boobs and snatch i do not think that she should be allowed to have kids until she cleans up her act.
  • raves     [-] by Yung Boom

    Answered Hell to the no!

    Shes A Fuccin Wreck
  • raves +1   [-] by jackie

    Answered Hell to the no!

    i dont think either one of them should have them kids they are both idiots seriously he is just as bad as her he just isn't getting caught
  • raves +1   [-] by iM iN L0VE WiTH A REAL MAN

    Answered Hell to the no!

    why? look at what she's done to her children.. she doesn't really deserve anything, all she's doing now is tryna get attention, and i don't like the way she's going about raising her child... i say hell to the no man, if you want something, you have to earn it, and it's not the right time for her right now, so that's my opinion. im out! peace_platinum people!
  • raves +1   [-] by jeaves1711

    Answered You bet!

    every mother has a right to see her children, sure britney has messed up a bit recently, but it happens to everybody so who are we to point the finger and judge?
  • raves +1   [-] by Tell_it_like_it_is
    We are sodaheads and that's what we do.
    LOL
  • raves +1   [-] by Angel

    Answered You bet!

    moderated...
  • raves +3   [-] by Angel41

    Answered Who cares?

    I think they should take her, O.J, Paris Hilton, and Lindsey Lohan and to a remote island. Drop them off...AND NEVER GO BACK TO GET THEM!!!
  • raves +1   [-] by Delphine

    Answered You bet!

    She have done mystake but I think the children have to see their mother, I say yes not for her but for them
  • raves +2   [-] by amoretpax

    Answered Who cares?

    why does this matter?
  • raves +2   [-] by BrownEyedGirl

    Answered Who cares?

    I'm inclined to say Hell to the no, but I'm at the who cares point now even more.
  • raves +1   [-] by Piglet

    Answered You bet!

    All children need their mother!
  • raves +1   [-] by Samuel[raccoon]

    Answered Who cares?

    Forget Britney
  • raves +1   [-] by iM iN L0VE WiTH A REAL MAN
    LMFAO!! that's hilarious..
    but true tho.. tru tru! good man.. good!
  • raves +4   [-] by Nance

    Answered Hell to the no!

    Not till she gets her act together enough to remember she has children; and to put them first instead of doing whatever she wants and acting like a spoiled brat. Who's the child here?
  • raves +1   [-] by Veeka

    Answered Who cares?

    My opioion is that she should have acted right toward her children w hen she first had them just because you are a star that does not mean that u can mistrear your child and get away with it. She has to earn them back.And they need to moniter K Fed i dont mean any harm by it but they just need to.