Angry neighbors beat rapist as security cam rolls. Is beating justified?

Jose Carrasquillo is in stable condition after an angry mob of neighbors beat the crap out of him when they realized he was wanted for viciously raping an 11-year old girl in their neighborhood. ... Jose Carrasquillo is in stable condition after an angry mob of neighbors beat the crap out of him when they realized he was wanted for viciously raping an 11-year old girl in their neighborhood. police say they weren't in the wrong for releasing a detailed description and photo of Carrasquillo, who has 17 prior arrests, to the neighbors of the little girl. Were the neighbors of the raped little girl right to beat up Crrasquillo?

(more)
Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.
No, neighbors were NOT in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.
I think Jose Carrasquillo...
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Question Stats
Top Comment
  • +3 raves The Simmering Frog June 03, 2009 23:14:28

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.



    Beat the crap out of the bastard!
View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • [-] Jerimiah August 23, 2009 02:17:49

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    As wrong as attacking someone can be, I feel that in this case it was justified. I would have done the same, this man viciously raped an 11 yr old girl. I think that he's lucky they didn't end up killing him. The pedophile got what he deserved.
  • [-] Sodaman June 11, 2009 04:28:03

    I think Jose Carrasquillo...

    If they caught him in the ACT of raping her: MAYBE! But, if it was after the fact, they should have made a citizens arrest. Beating him to a pulp is just plain OVERKILL! They should have held him for the police.
  • [-] andrea June 05, 2009 23:43:34

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    honestly if they were not there he would still be roaming the streets and maybe thinking of doing that to someone else. so it is fantastic to get another perv. off the street.
  • [-] Splashie June 05, 2009 23:37:02

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    By golly, we have too much of this happening nowadays.

    And what happens, these sex offenders are allowed out of prison in a couple of years, just to do it all over again.

    If communities stick together, these sick offenders would think twice before committing such a crime!

    It's a very scary time to be raising children and something needs to be done! They don't have the freedom that I had as a child.

    In the neighborhood that I grew up in, everyone chipped in and helped.

    Bottom line, I believe communities should stick together and be active, let offenders of sex, drugs, etc. know that this behavior will not be tolerated!
  • [-] papag38 Splashie June 11, 2009 00:46:09
    Congress is going to pass a law that says if you hit one of these pedifiles it is a hate crime and you will go to prison and he will roam the streets.you better check with your Senator or Pelosi and Bama they are the ones who want this law passed
  • [-] mare June 05, 2009 15:35:03

    I think Jose Carrasquillo...

    i can TOTALLY understand them wanting to beat the shit out of him- that doesnt mean they should- hell prolly get enough of that in prison
  • [-] Formulabruce June 05, 2009 03:39:28

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    well, if they knew he was guilty, he will get beat in jail anyway
  • [-] BigwayneO June 04, 2009 15:12:10

    No, neighbors were NOT in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    No, Lawfully any way No, Pretty simple.
  • [-] papag38 BigwayneO June 11, 2009 00:46:58
    You better hope it 's not your kid then.
  • +1 raves [-] HOLLYWAY June 04, 2009 15:03:37

    No, neighbors were NOT in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    Unfortunately raping ll year old girls will get you beaten both in or out of jail .But it's not right to beat someone for a crime they may have committed. It's not up to us. It's vigilante. There has to be a trial and the punishment is up to the justice system. Otherwise you could be accused,judged and hung in the street by an angry mob.
  • [-] papag38 HOLLYWAY June 11, 2009 00:47:27
    oh well
  • [-] HOLLYWAY papag38 June 11, 2009 02:08:18
    He has priors and he probably had it coming. I wonder if they were sexual assault related because if they were I want to know why he was on the street in the first place.I just watched the movie Gran Torino with Clint Eastwood. I was very surprised how good it was and how poignant. About a neighborhood with Chinese Americans and gang stuff. I give it four stars.Check it out.
  • [-] papag38 HOLLYWAY June 13, 2009 01:43:25
    After working in two different State systems,nothing suprises me about Sex offenders being let out early and now in some states they don't have to register so the police have no idea where they are,This new Hate Crimes bill that the Democrats are doing their best to make a law protect the Pedifile on the streets from any reprocussions form the familys of the child who was raped.If you beat the hell out of them you are charged with a hate crime and they can sue you and you can end up in prision for your actions,I will check out the Movie because I like Eastwoods acting,Some how the people of this country have to tell the courts to follow the laws as they are set and not make up thier own laws to go easy on offenders,if they are not stopped you are going to see a lot more of this and when people have finally had enough you are going to see a lot of these prediators killed instead of beat up because if you are caught you will go to prision either way,It is a shame the way this country is going.
  • [-] HOLLYWAY papag38 June 13, 2009 02:51:50
    That's why we the people have to stick together and abide by the principals that are at the core of this country. It's never been easy but we are Americans and we have to be true to our constitution.
  • [-] papag38 HOLLYWAY June 13, 2009 15:19:25
    You are right but the peoples problem is not following the law it is getting the courts to follow the law and no reright it every time they think its not the way they want it to read,and the more liberals that are appointed to the courts the more that this problem will happen.
  • +1 raves [-] ladypuppylove June 04, 2009 14:17:46

    No, neighbors were NOT in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    If he did it yes whip his ass because the government will do nothing
  • +1 raves [-] *Ash*~In Conor&Murphy I Tru... June 04, 2009 11:44:04

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    abso-fucking-lutely because chances are the law won't serve him the justice he deserves.
  • +1 raves [-] tink1985 June 04, 2009 05:58:46

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    If it were my daughter, i'd have to be pulled off that sick idiot before I killed him. Those neighbors had every right, he was a threat to everyone in the area.
  • +1 raves [-] Chelsea June 04, 2009 04:46:22

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    good for them!
  • +1 raves [-] HeliAce June 04, 2009 04:13:24

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    Phh... With 17 prior arrests you know he is guilty. Beat him up some more.
  • +1 raves [-] alegra::Anti-Choice:: June 04, 2009 02:49:10

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    I strongly believe that anyone who tries to or takes the innocence of a child should be drawn and quartered.
  • +1 raves [-] wyotech June 04, 2009 02:22:03

    I think Jose Carrasquillo...

    Should have been beat to death. He will be once he gets behind bars.
  • [-] Wardian June 04, 2009 00:38:29

    No, neighbors were NOT in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    I like the idea of these neighborhoods policing themselves, but not beating on suspects. They could have served the community much better if the detained the suspect for the police, without the beating. They should all be charged with battery, Who made them judge, jury, and executioner.
  • +1 raves [-] papag38 Wardian June 11, 2009 00:48:48
    you better hope that it was not your kid then
  • [-] Wardian papag38 June 12, 2009 00:43:09
    Please, I hope someday your kid is not accused of a crime, and some vigilantly gang beats the hell out of him. No, it dose not matter if he's/she's guilty or not, it only matters that the neighborhood is safer. While in the hospital, you both can watch the award ceremony, given for the "hero". Give me a %$(*^# brake!
  • [-] papag38 Wardian June 13, 2009 01:52:15
    For some reason you seem to want to go easy on the offender and have the family turn the other cheek,you have to understand that the new hate crime bill if made into law will protect the pedifile and if he is hurt in any way by a member of the chiilds family,that member can go to prision for protecting his loved ones.I have worked in two different State Syatems and these people are the lowest of the lowest and a lot of them never finish their sentence because they are killed in the prision.
    They are not talking about some one who they think done it ,the person they are talking about was seen doing the crime and it was found out latter that he had done the same thing before and the system let him free,I know what you are saying but in this case its a shame that they did not waste him.
  • [-] Wardian papag38 June 13, 2009 17:22:38
    They could have been mistaken, this kid could be someone who just looked like him, or his brother.
    We are talking about forgoing the judicial system, and supporting vigilantism. This is not the answer. We need to reform the system we have, it works well if followed. There is too much bureaucracy, and too many liberal judges. The police unions are to strong, and these mayors are entrenched with power. They surround themselves with appointments of supporters who will "play Ball". As citizens we need to educate ourselves, and vote in competent leaders who will do the work of the people, before it;s to late.
  • +1 raves [-] papag38 Wardian June 17, 2009 18:35:06
    I have to agree with everything you have said,including that it could have been someone other than the Rapists,but this time he was caught in the act and the liberal judges that you talk about would probably slap his hands and put him back on the streets again to commit another crime.They need to find out who the judge was the last time they let him go and remove him from the bench and just maybe that would make a difference but as long as there is the good ole boy systems that willl never happen,I agree the people need to vote in competent leaders but we should ave thought of that wnen they voted in Bama,because that was the biggest mistake this country has ever made,as we look at who we have to vote for today just how many of those that you see are not scared to run for office.
    you and I may both see vigilantism before this congress is over and that will be a shame but the people have had enough and they are mad and tired.
  • +1 raves [-] Reverend Muerte June 04, 2009 00:34:18

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    I would have torn that motherf*cker apart with my bare hands. I've beat the life out of rapists and child molesters while I was locked up, I'd love to do it again
  • [-] ctuagentdown June 04, 2009 00:06:55

    No, neighbors were NOT in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    but if they got the right guy more power to them.
  • +1 raves [-] dfm June 03, 2009 23:43:02

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    i would have to
  • +1 raves [-] momacita33 June 03, 2009 23:38:06

    No, neighbors were NOT in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    no, of course they were not in the right to do that, but i guess i woulda been right there with them beating the hell out of him, right or wrong
  • +2 raves [-] Eddie June 03, 2009 23:23:56

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    I hate child rapists. I think he should have gotten worse.
  • +2 raves [-] Katy June 03, 2009 23:22:39

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    Normally I would say 'innocent until proven guilty'. But....the guys had 17 other offenses, even if by some chance he actually didn't rape that girl....ya know he did something to deserve an ass whoopin'.
    I'd've helped those neighbours. Swing away.
  • +3 raves [-] The Simmering Frog June 03, 2009 23:14:28

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.



    Beat the crap out of the bastard!
  • [-] papag38 The Sim... June 13, 2009 02:08:07
    This Cardnial spoke against crimes against the people,but at no time did he speak about the Priest who RAPED young boys in their churches and also of how many Preist he helped hide and transfer so they would not be charged with a crime.
  • [-] Dammit Yammit June 03, 2009 23:11:52

    I think Jose Carrasquillo...

    Is a lucky man for the time being. and somebodys bitch later. have fun boys!!
  • +1 raves [-] Cappy Town June 03, 2009 23:05:19

    No, neighbors were NOT in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    Innocent until proven guilty. It's called civilization; join it.
  • [-] OhioCri... Cappy Town June 03, 2009 23:18:45
    and if that had been your little girl, sister, wife/gf or mother that had gotten raped would you still feel the same way???
  • [-] judypatudy June 03, 2009 23:02:20

    Yes, neighbors were in the right to beat up Jose Carrasquillo.

    neighbors beat jose carrasquillo

Community Activity

or
Cancel