SodaHead Celebrates Green Week

Submit News News

Michael Jackson's Autopsies, Family Secrets and Lies

- SodaHead revealed yesterday that heroin was the cause of Michael Jackson's death. The Jacksons don't want this info public and are taking precautions to keep it under wraps, including allegedly authorizing a third autopsy.

According to our source, the family was denied a request to move the body to a different facility for the second autopsy. Had it been moved and conflicting results were found, this would give cause for an inconclusive report, keeping the true cause of death unknown. Since their plan was foiled on the second autopsy, the family pushed for a third - this time moving the body to a new location so they can dispute the findings in the original reports, says our source.

It's no coincidence that a memorial planned for this weekend was canceled and a new funeral set for Tuesday. Thousands of disappointed fans hoped to pay their respects at the public memorial at Neverland, which was widely reported though the family now claims was never confirmed. Was it all a sham to buy time for a third autopsy at the expense of Michael's fans?


Break this news on:

... Read full article »
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Top Comment
  • +22 raves Michael July 03, 2009 00:16:55
    Michael
    I typically stay out of these conversations, but please know we at SodaHead are not here to make outrageous claims or make up stories for popularity. We have news and information that has not been reported. We believe it to be absolutely true, otherwise we would never publish it. We have been told many other Jackson exclusive news and have not reported it....all of which has come to fruition. We feel the source has been verified and credibility established. I am personally a big fan of MJ's and this should in no way reflect on his musical genius!
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • hillbilly Patti July 03, 2009 12:45:34 (edited)
    hillbilly
    And Satan loves sub-humans like your hero micheal
  • Patti hillbilly July 03, 2009 16:06:46
    Patti
    he is not my hero just a great musician and dancer that does not deserve such ignorant remarks. did u ever hear RIP. P stands for peace. Let it be.
  • hillbilly Patti July 04, 2009 00:38:39
    hillbilly
    For the record lets get one thing straight Micheal Jackson was not a musician he was a singer. The only thing Micheal ever learned how to play was a radio.As for being a dancer that is certainly a matter of opinion also, sure grabbing your crotch in the presence of children some might call that talent NOT
  • Patti hillbilly July 04, 2009 01:47:04
    Patti
    singing falls under the musician category. They have singers in the bands. And he was extremely talented. Jealousy does not become you. and him grabbing his crotch like men do? ALL men. There is always some guy including professionals adjusting crotch. Again RIP to MJ. Now if you dont like that, um, tough.
  • +1 raves
    Kat n Mc hillbilly July 03, 2009 07:11:47
    Kat n Mc
    KEEP BEING A HILLBILLY RACIST LOSER BITCH!!
  • +1 raves
    hillbilly Kat n Mc July 03, 2009 12:44:50
    hillbilly
    Keep supporting an obvious know child molester, you must be one too
  • Patti hillbilly July 03, 2009 16:08:31
    Patti
    that is funny. got out of both charges but money hungry ppl that change their original accusations repeatedly is a sign of lies and greed. Do u know about those two terms. Lies. GREED. Yea its out there just in case you misinformed
  • Ann hillbilly July 04, 2009 06:48:41
    Ann
    Amen, he was just a cracked out junkie assed pedophile who happened to be a talented song writer. But he was a freak show. His doctor's license had expired, MJ was a junkie, a sex offender, broke, and God knows what else. No one should be singing his praises. If it were an average Joe, people would be spitting on him.
  • Terry hillbilly July 03, 2009 14:49:15
    Terry
    So you would leave your child with a known child molestor, is that what you are saying?
  • hillbilly Terry July 04, 2009 00:42:47
    hillbilly
    What the hell are you talking about, certainly not, nor would I in any form support one, like Micheal Jackson.
  • SexiKitten July 03, 2009 00:30:16
    SexiKitten
    eeeek i knew that family seemed off
  • tayler SexiKitten July 04, 2009 06:24:03
    tayler
    are all of yu out of yer minds whos bashin him god let him rest in peace...yu have nothin to do with tht mans life...we dont even know the story behind all of tht...so gosh stop bashin someone who has moved to a better place and grow up really!
  • Swaps July 03, 2009 00:29:35
    Swaps
    Illegal drugs are so readily available. Wonder who the dealer was. A memorable sale for him.
  • Michael... Swaps July 03, 2009 01:56:36
    MichaelJacksonLIVES
    bet it was the dad.
  • walter2008 July 03, 2009 00:27:02
    walter2008
    How many fans, and how much is it costing them?
    It's just one less freaky pedophile breathing good air.
  • +22 raves
    Michael July 03, 2009 00:16:55
    Michael
    I typically stay out of these conversations, but please know we at SodaHead are not here to make outrageous claims or make up stories for popularity. We have news and information that has not been reported. We believe it to be absolutely true, otherwise we would never publish it. We have been told many other Jackson exclusive news and have not reported it....all of which has come to fruition. We feel the source has been verified and credibility established. I am personally a big fan of MJ's and this should in no way reflect on his musical genius!
  • +7 raves
    Kenyon Michael July 03, 2009 01:34:21 (edited)
    Kenyon
    No Michael it is not that you are making claims up or not but when a source is not named it makes it sound more like the National Enquirer than let's say a more reputable place of information. Now no disrespect but I don't come here for entertainment news but more for discussion. If I want entertainment news I go to TMZ.
  • +2 raves
    Michael... Kenyon July 03, 2009 01:56:02
    MichaelJacksonLIVES
    Any 'source' who GIVES a name is a. full of it or b. planted as a diversion. No one with any inside info would reveal it and allow their name to be known... unless they want to be slapped with a big fat lawsuit for violating the confidentiality agreements they sign before going anywhere NEAR a celeb of that caliber. If a name is given that's a red flag for BS.
  • +1 raves
    Kenyon Michael... July 03, 2009 13:46:03
    Kenyon
    So then if some one is slapped with a big lawsuit then the only way they can be sued is if it is not true to begin with which makes my point.
  • +1 raves
    Michael... Kenyon July 03, 2009 18:53:02
    MichaelJacksonLIVES
    Ha, not exactly. People who violate confidentiality will be sued. Liars (named sources) who are planted to throw the media off the trail will be cashing their checks :)
«« First « Prev ... 87 88 89 90 91 92 ... 93 Next » Last »
or
Cancel