YouTube refuses to remove Mohammed movie clips - Telegraph: Agree?
Heisenberg
2012/09/13 19:27:22
|
|
|||||
|
108 votes
|
|
82% | |||
|
24 votes
|
|
18% | |||
TELEGRAPH.CO.UK reports:
YouTube will not remove a film clip mocking the Islamic Prophet Mohammad that
has been blamed for anti-US protests in Egypt and Libya, but it has blocked
access to it in those countries.
Read More: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/95400...
Top Opinion
-
Billyk75 2012/09/13 19:30:00
If you're an Atheist who wants to insult religion and suppress the beliefs of the majorities, you can find out about God's judgment when you die.
-More so than the moral-less Atheism that promotes homosexuality, genocide, and religious suppression that we have put into place in the United States government, public schools, and legal systems. Muslims attacked our country to cleanse our Atheist immorality; the Qur'an forbids the Muslims from leaving their culture and interacting with "outsiders of Islam" unless they are cleansing an area of its immorality. Our immorality and intervention in the Middle East, such as removing their religious laws in substitution with our Atheist laws caused them to become our great enemies. Back in the Cold War, when we had Reagan and Christian laws, they were our allies against the Godless Communists, but we changed, not them.
"As a Christian myself, I don't see ANY similarities with the theocracy of Islam."
-Are you a true Christian who believes in the Holy Bible? Don't you remember when God sent Moses to cleanse and conquer the immoral Amorites in Deuteronomy?
"You kinda need to read the book before you drink their koolaid."
-I have read the entirety of the Holy Bible and ex...
-More so than the moral-less Atheism that promotes homosexuality, genocide, and religious suppression that we have put into place in the United States government, public schools, and legal systems. Muslims attacked our country to cleanse our Atheist immorality; the Qur'an forbids the Muslims from leaving their culture and interacting with "outsiders of Islam" unless they are cleansing an area of its immorality. Our immorality and intervention in the Middle East, such as removing their religious laws in substitution with our Atheist laws caused them to become our great enemies. Back in the Cold War, when we had Reagan and Christian laws, they were our allies against the Godless Communists, but we changed, not them.
"As a Christian myself, I don't see ANY similarities with the theocracy of Islam."
-Are you a true Christian who believes in the Holy Bible? Don't you remember when God sent Moses to cleanse and conquer the immoral Amorites in Deuteronomy?
"You kinda need to read the book before you drink their koolaid."
-I have read the entirety of the Holy Bible and excerpts of the Qur'an.
"ALL MUSLIMS BELIEVE IN SHARIA LAW SUPERSEDING ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT."
-I wish that were true, but look at Saudi Arabia and its violations of Sharia Law. You are correct that most maintain a theocracy as they were commanded to. Better than our method of allowing Atheists (only 1.6% of Americans) to bully all monotheistic believers (81% of Americans).
-Then why did the vast majority in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Bahrain, Syria, Algeria, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, and Sudan risk their lives against brutal police forces and armies to specifically state that they wanted Sharia Law?
"Democracy and Islam are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE."
-So far in practice, but that isn't ideologically necessary. The Qur'an doesn't directly oppose Democracy.
"at worst you get a boot on the neck and a sword at the throat of anyone who knows that Islam is a murderous pedophiliac cult and speaks out about it's tyranny."
-That can happen democratically. If they do become a real democracy, you can count on the majorities voting for that.
-A Republic can be democratic; the key is, "Are the politicians doing what the majority of citizens want?"
"We've never established a state religion."
-Not in technical terms because it was against the views of the founding fathers who desired the freedom of religion; they wanted it to protect Deists (which many of them were), Jews, and Catholics. However, Christianity has been the driving force for our legislature, philosophies, and policies.
"mush less made that religion our complete basis for the structure of law, as it is in the Islamic theocracy."
-Wrong! From the conception of the United States until JFK created a "secular government," all of our laws were based in Christian origin. Two basic examples would be:
Sexual Ethics: Adultery, Bestiality, and Homosexuality were (some still are) punished in the American legal system.
Capital Punishment: The Hebrew method of humane execution for great crimes has been employed since Jamestown in 1607.
"If that is what those countries want then fine. However any/all "humanitarian aid" we give these countries should cease and desist entirely. And I'm talking completely. including private donations. It's like RICO. Any support ends up aiding terrorists in some fashion."
-I agree there.
-Not exclusively, but many Asian countries did not have them until they learned it from the West. Since it was first a Jewish/Christian law; I must give the credit to Christianity/Judaism.
"They're a universal moral concept that exist in societies. "
-Fortunately every country adopted them eventually, but Eastern countries only got them after they learned it from the west. Despicably, most of those laws have been abolished in modern history; somehow people fail to see all of our new moral problems that have been the resultant.
"many of these concepts can be traced back to the code of Hammurabi"
-Except for being universal laws which are well enforced, our legal system has little to no resemblance. Look at their laws and tell me some of the same laws.
"Doesn't mean we as a society are divorced from God"
-With Obama's legislature, the U.S. government has become very anti-Christian/Jewish. Take a look: http://www.wallbuilders.com/l...
-Not only that, but more so on what constitutes illegal behavior. Our moral code (or at least original moral code) has a much closer basis to the Biblical laws than Hammurabi's code.
"I still maintain you can be a fine American citizen and celebrate our freedoms and not be divorced from God. But I agree the left is doing what it can to eliminate that possibility."
-From where I sit, the American government broke up with God in 1962 when public prayer in school was illegalized. Then divorced when we legalized homosexual intercourse in 2003. Finally, the U.S. has spit in the face of God and attempted to legalize homosexual marriage.
It's not hardly YouTube's place, to decide which videos are appropriate or not, but rather, the viewer who should decide which videos they choose to watch.
Where does the path of "censorship" end? With the government censoring everything except for pro-government propaganda?
Why don't those lazy, savage Muslims, do a better job themselves, defending their pathetic false religion, that is, if that's even possible? They choose to pretend "offense" for choosing to watch, but are too pathetic and lazy to upload a rebuttal, or to even use the Comments feature to point out any supposed errors the videos may have made? Do we need any more proof that Islam is false, other than the bad behavior of its adherents, and that they appear either unwilling or unable to defend their false religion of violence?
Sure, maybe we ought to respect people's religions, but then, shouldn't they respect ours? Seems like that might need to go both ways? Well unless we really are talking about savages, looking for an excuse to stir something up?
Muslims 0
Christians 0
Jews win!
The only people that murder more are atheists and liberals pretending to be Christian.
By the way, how many people killed in abortion clinic bombings in the last 10 years?
The Sikh temple killer was no Christian but nice try liberal.
And in case you haven't heard, there are some good Christian apologists, who go to great lengths to explain our faith. But then, they never make a good explanation, as to why so many Christians, follow tradition of man, rather than the 4th commandment?
9-11 was an inside job. If so, maybe somebody might want to explore, whether some "abortion clinic bombing" might also have been an inside job, some trick of the government, to pass more unjust "laws." I mean it is a logical question to ask. Most Christians aren't like that. In fact, just the opposite. So many seem to be outright leftist in their politics, or simply don't even care to take much of a stance, one way or the other. But are Muslims like that? Anywhere there are Muslims, there always seems to be turmoil and violence, and the...
And in case you haven't heard, there are some good Christian apologists, who go to great lengths to explain our faith. But then, they never make a good explanation, as to why so many Christians, follow tradition of man, rather than the 4th commandment?
9-11 was an inside job. If so, maybe somebody might want to explore, whether some "abortion clinic bombing" might also have been an inside job, some trick of the government, to pass more unjust "laws." I mean it is a logical question to ask. Most Christians aren't like that. In fact, just the opposite. So many seem to be outright leftist in their politics, or simply don't even care to take much of a stance, one way or the other. But are Muslims like that? Anywhere there are Muslims, there always seems to be turmoil and violence, and the world is getting sick and tired of their wicked behavior.
But so few people even bother, to search out diligently, the truth.