Yes or no: Is good grammar a turn-on?

by Curmudgeon Posted 2012/09/22 03:17:35

Read More

16 votes
Read all 18 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes, it is!	11 votes	69%
	I could care less...	4 votes	25%
	I have another thought...	1 vote	6%

Add a comment above

Linkums 2012/09/22 03:28:09

I have another thought...

+4
It's more like bad grammar is a turn off and good grammar is just expected.
>> See Replies

More polls by Curmudgeon

FortunaVeritas 2012/09/24 03:27:12

Yes, it is!

Though bad grammar and spelling are more repulsive than good grammar and spelling are attractive.

reply
NotTargetMaterial 2012/09/22 07:31:53

I could care less...

+1
No. Saving money is.

reply
ilstarwars 2012/09/22 06:09:53

Yes, it is!

+3
Because I am more attracted to smart people, which inevitably makes bad grammar a turn off.

reply
Dryth 2012/09/22 06:01:50

Yes, it is!

+3
More specifically, a firm grasp of the english language is a turn on. I'd likely appreciate more someone who can toy with the english language in a way that I know they are intentionally circumventing the rules of grammar either to make a point or just to be funny. :P

reply
rk to Dryth 2012/09/22 16:01:55

+1
I enjoy the Verbal fisticuffs but do not type fast enough to justify the grammatically correct posting.

reply
Dryth to rk 2012/09/22 16:14:02

+1
I type pretty damn fast, but I don't think that matters. The important part is just being quick on your metaphorical tongue.

reply
rk to Dryth 2012/09/22 23:19:37

+1
Some, multitask. I do. Most of the blogs are typed while working on important activities. Sodahead is simply a distraction.

reply
doctorwhofan~Tatae~BN-4 2012/09/22 04:44:49

Yes, it is!

+2
Or at least bad grammer is a turn-off.

reply
Kat 2012/09/22 04:20:07

I could care less...

+1
But I prefer to be able to converse with people with good grammar

reply
☆stillthe12c☆ 2012/09/22 04:14:32

I could care less...

+2
As long as I can understand them, I have no problem.

reply
NotTarg... to ☆stillt... 2012/09/22 07:34:45

+1
God bless you good sir.

reply
☆stillt... to NotTarg... 2012/09/22 16:09:57

+1
God Bless You as well

reply
Linkums 2012/09/22 03:28:09

I have another thought...

+4
It's more like bad grammar is a turn off and good grammar is just expected.

reply
Ville Elo-Squiggles\(>.<)/ 2012/09/22 03:20:38

Yes, it is!

$Ville Elo-Squiggles\(>.<)/$

+4
for me bad grammar is bit of a turn off so Yes..

reply
rk 2012/09/22 03:19:51

I could care less...

+2
Ain't any things that I kant stand

reply
Okie Lady to rk 2012/09/22 15:48:30

+1
Shouldn't you have said "cain't" instead of "kant?"

reply
rk to Okie Lady 2012/09/22 15:59:25

+1
Waz u problm homy wit mi rap

reply
Okie Lady to rk 2012/09/22 16:09:40

+1
just your spelling! We say "cain't" not "kant"!

reply