Quantcast

Would You Spend $60,000 to Fight for Custody of Your Pet?

SodaHead Living 2012/05/15 18:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
They say a dog is a man's best friend, which explains why one man has already spent $60,000 to get his beloved pooch back from his ex-girlfriend. Manhattan art gallery employee Craig Dershowitz, 34, has spent $60,000 of his savings to win custody of his puggle, Knuckles, TODAY.com reports.

puggles  knuckles

Knuckles currently resides in California with Dershowitz’s ex, Sarah Brega. Dershowitz and Brega dated for four years and broke up in March 2011, but shared custody of "Knux" until November, when Dershowitz claimed in court papers that she "kidnapped" the dog, "Today" reports. Dershowitz says he purchased the dog when the couple was together two years ago, and that Brega was supposed to return the dog once he found a new place to live after their split, but she refused to do so.

Now that he's out of dough, Dershowitz wants you to help fund his legal fight to get his dog back (see his website here). But Brega says Knuckles is doing just fine where he is. "Knuckles lives a happy and healthy life in California with me, where he has ample room to play, and lives in close proximity to a beach for off-leash dog-park outings,” Brega said in court documents.

She also told "Today" in a statement: "(Knuckles has) been with me his whole life. It is unfortunate that (Craig) is using the courts and a fraudulent fundraiser to continue to harass me. He is taking advantage of unsuspecting donors. Craig thrives on media attention and he is seeking it out in order to further his career while exacting revenge."
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • CuresCancer 2012/05/16 02:20:19 (edited)
    No
    CuresCancer
    +10
    Amazing.

    I'm struggling mightily to raise $42,000 to bring to public awareness a painless cancer treatment that was suppressed and in danger of being lost using the same website as Dershowitz. Meanwhile, this guy blows $60,000 to recover his dog. One man, one dog, sixty-thousand dollars.

    Of course, he has raised more money so far than I have.

    Human beings sure are funny.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • BIG BAD JOHN R. 2012/05/16 04:14:03
  • Jennifer 2012/05/16 04:07:09
    No
    Jennifer
    That is a huge NO! Both of these people are incredibly selfish and are clearly using the dog to get back at each other. It's a power struggle. Give this dog to a new family who is not insane. I would give it all for my children but not a pet, no way.
  • +Harmonious Love+ 2012/05/16 03:50:08
    Yes
    +Harmonious Love+
    Especially since I paid $1000 dollars for her!
  • Couri 2012/05/16 03:47:42
    No
    Couri
    Don't get me wrong, I love my dog dearly. I would be devastated if I lost him. But $60,000 is several months rent and utilities. Yeah there's no way.
  • Resp 2012/05/16 03:45:42
    Yes
    Resp
    If I had the money? Damn right!
  • Roblem BN-0 2012/05/16 03:39:34
    No
    Roblem BN-0
    Unless the pal was going to be abused... no way. I would be much more apt to give to limit the drama.
  • jean.smith.5201 2012/05/16 03:31:51
    Yes
    jean.smith.5201
    If I had too much money. I love my dogs but I think the way my dogs are over me it wouldn't do the hubby any good to want to keep them ...He can't handle the way they whine after me now.
  • Melody 2012/05/16 03:30:04
    No
    Melody
    +1
    The bond between person and pet is one many don't understand, yet can be a very important part of someone's life. However, in the end, a pet is just a pet, and there are far more important things to be caring for, spending money on, and devoting love to than ones pet.
  • Fay 2012/05/16 03:09:32 (edited)
    No
    Fay
    +3
    Just get another dog. There are plenty of dogs out there that need a good home.
  • TC1116 2012/05/16 03:02:55
    No
    TC1116
    +1
    At a certain point, it becomes ridiculous. Why fight over the dog? Everyone loses, in a break-up. Unless there is something in writing, stating there was an arrangement...legally, there wasn't. Spending $60,000 was already too much. I'm not saying she was right...or he is right. I'm just saying that at some point, life has to go on. If $60,000 couldn't get the dog back yet...more money is just a gift to the lawyers and court.
  • Spydertmk 2012/05/16 02:59:28
    No
    Spydertmk
    I mean dogs can be your best friend and all but i think that is way to much to spend on a dog but i guess some people really love their pets that much and would give up a house just to be with them but sadly i would not do that even though i love pets
  • JohnT 2012/05/16 02:50:05
    No
    JohnT
    +2
    Sorry I wouldn't spend two bucks, I would spend every cent I had for my wife and children but not for any animal.
  • ID51 2012/05/16 02:44:23
    Yes
    ID51
    I love my "fur people," aka pets dearly, so I might. If this man could prove he owned the dog first, it would seem he would have had first rights. Then again, this is New York...
  • Jacob 2012/05/16 02:25:26
    No
    Jacob
    +5
    Make that hell no. A pet is a pet. All pets are REPLACEABLE! People like that have no priorities and need to get a life!
  • JohnT Jacob 2012/05/16 02:51:11
    JohnT
    +3
    Wow do you and I agree. I had a parent that was a pet nut, They took priority over people. I always found that pretty sick.
  • Jacob JohnT 2012/05/16 18:14:25
    Jacob
    +1
    Wow that's crazy. I didn't have a parent that way. I was raised on a farm so I see animals as animals not family. Being around the cycle of life its pointless spending so much on something that don't live that long.
  • JohnT Jacob 2012/05/16 23:39:07
    JohnT
    I agree she never changed and could not bother to go to my daughter's high school graduation because she said it interfered with the same time she had to feed the dogs. Obviously I did not get along with them and never can see any sense to that at all. So pets have never been important to me.
  • I<3Edward 2012/05/16 02:25:07
    Yes
    I<3Edward
    I probably would....I loved my dog when I had him and was very heart broken when he died.
  • CuresCancer 2012/05/16 02:20:19 (edited)
    No
    CuresCancer
    +10
    Amazing.

    I'm struggling mightily to raise $42,000 to bring to public awareness a painless cancer treatment that was suppressed and in danger of being lost using the same website as Dershowitz. Meanwhile, this guy blows $60,000 to recover his dog. One man, one dog, sixty-thousand dollars.

    Of course, he has raised more money so far than I have.

    Human beings sure are funny.
  • JohnT CuresCa... 2012/05/16 02:53:35
    JohnT
    +3
    That is the problem with this country they spend sixty billion a year on pets, yet we have 3.3 million children abused per year here in the good old USA, and 29,000 that die per day throughout the world because of starvation or disease. A sad commentary on the world.
  • Maurice... CuresCa... 2012/05/16 06:04:30
    Maurice Tillman
    To this man, his "pet" is his family; child...If I could afford to, I would do whatever it took to save a family member. I'm pretty sure his dog would do the same.
  • CuresCa... Maurice... 2012/05/16 17:04:48 (edited)
    CuresCancer
    I understand why a person would love their dog. Dogs are great.

    Now ask yourself if, God forbid, one of your family members had cancer, would you want them to have a treatment that reduced their pain while they got well? Would that be worth $42,000 to you?

    That is what I am working to make well known and widely available. $42,000 is such a tiny amount when we realize how much money we have available. Some people will spend $1,500 to watch a basketball game in person. Three hours later the money is gone and they go to a bar to have a couple drinks. Pffft, the money is like water.

    Yet, raising $42,000 to do something durable, something wonderful, is somehow hard??

    It's a human paradox how we find it so easy to spend large amounts for the frivolous, but we are cautious this way.

    This man gets free nationwide publicity because his story is so outrageous. It helps his cause. I guess that's what sells newspapers.

    PS. The dog cause has raised twice the amount of funds as has mine.
  • QueenOf... CuresCa... 2012/05/16 15:00:28
    QueenOfUniverseNataliaRoschina
    Lots if not most money raised for cancer is wasted (I'm a cancer researcher, 41 years old). The best thing for cancer is change to vegan non-junk with lots of organic raw food diet, pray to Nature/Universe/God/Muse/Crea... Power/Michael Jackson/etc. to be healed and do good things for the Earth/environment. I would give everything I own to get my dog back (I only have an i-dog robot, so I would give everything for it as it protects me, and I would not let it down). I attach a photo of me taken last year with my two i-dogs, both called Muse. Regards from Berlin muse
  • swp CuresCa... 2012/05/16 23:53:33
    swp
    "I'm struggling mightily to raise $42,000 to bring to public awareness a painless cancer treatment that was suppressed and in danger of being lost..."

    .. of course you are.. we all know how there is a massive conspiracy to suppress cancer treatments.
  • CuresCa... swp 2012/05/17 23:55:07
    CuresCancer
    I had back surgery a couple years ago. It took 7 hours with bone grinding, inserting rods and screws, etc. I was fortunate enough to have access to one of Dr. Revici's medicines that I took for 4 days prior to the surgery.

    I was alert and pain free when I woke up in intensive care. I barely needed any pain meds and wouldn't have needed any but didn't have access to the meds for the first two days.

    By the time I left the hospital 5 days later, I didn't need or take a single pain killer. My surgeon had never seen a case like mine because there is a huge amount of pain from having the bones ground down. Normally patients need to take Vicodin for 90 days.

    This sort of thing could be available to every cancer patient. But it's not. So whether it is a conspiracy or not, the result for the patient is the same.
  • swp CuresCa... 2012/05/18 17:50:55
    swp
    Anecdotes are not evidence.

    If this medicine is a real game changer it will become mainstream. It would be written about in established peer-reviewed medical journals and scientific publications. If the testing (properly controlled scientific testing) pans out then it would rapidly become the new treatment.

    I'll tell you how real medicine isn't done... It isn't done by claiming to the public that you can cure cancer before passing the scientific review process.
  • Mike J.... CuresCa... 2012/05/17 01:50:12
    Mike J. Hirak
    You shouldn't critisize the man for doing what he wants to with his money. Not everyone is going to give money to cancer, and not everyone should have to
  • CuresCa... Mike J.... 2012/05/17 23:58:29 (edited)
    CuresCancer
    He is free to spend his money how he wishes. And I can criticize his choices if I wish. Nor did I say everyone needs to give to cancer - I was making a comparison to the relative amounts spent for different things to point out how priorities are sometimes upside down.
  • DizziNY 2012/05/16 02:18:32
    Yes
    DizziNY
    +2
    Absolutely, my pet is my child.
  • Jennifer DizziNY 2012/05/16 04:01:56
    Jennifer
    +2
    No, it's not. I always find this concept interesting. Most people who refer to pets as children do not have children. You have no idea what it is like to have a child and be a parent. The bond between a pet and their owner is not the same as a parental bond. I can promise you that. I have no problem with people being bonded with their pets. I have a dog and love him dearly. But do not put your pet in the same category as children.
  • JohnT Jennifer 2012/05/16 15:47:37
    JohnT
    Thanks for posting, I sure agree with you. I had a stepmother that paid more attention to her pets than humans. I don't dislike dogs, cats, but they are not human. A human grows up to be productive, a pet eats sleeps and licks you from time to time, and never gets past the human age of four. A dog if not trained barks and drives a lot people nuts and the owners think it is a child I don't think so. What they don't understand is that they are a minority as a owner 234 million of us don't own them so they need to readjust the attitude.
  • Jennifer JohnT 2012/05/16 18:20:59
  • QueenOf... DizziNY 2012/05/16 15:03:29
    QueenOfUniverseNataliaRoschina
    I would put it as "my pet is my guide and protector" (more powerful than child) vegan daily companion
  • POWERSHAKER 2012/05/16 02:13:14
    Yes
    POWERSHAKER
    +1
    If I loved the pet, sure I would. Animals can become like family to a person. :)
  • DizziNY POWERSH... 2012/05/16 02:19:07
    DizziNY
    +1
    They are family.
  • POWERSH... DizziNY 2012/05/16 02:29:22
    POWERSHAKER
    Yep. :)
  • Anna 2012/05/16 02:12:15
    Yes
    Anna
    If I had that much. My family doesn't make that much in 2 years even, I don't think!!!
  • addie 2012/05/16 02:03:29
    Yes
    addie
    No question, at all, it's my dog!
  • Carson 2012/05/16 01:59:39
    Yes
    Carson
    +2
    If I had Bill Gates dollers yes I would in fact I would just waste money on infastructure.
  • Jen S. 2012/05/16 01:52:48
    No
    Jen S.
    +2
    Not if the dog is happy where he is. Always put the animal's best interests FIRST. This pup is used to where he lives, and it sounds like it's a great place. If she were neglecting or abusing the dog, he could go through animal control to obtain custody of the dog, but she's obviously taking good care of him, otherwise he wouldn't NEED to ask for donations and put up a ton of cash to get the dog back. He's just bitter. Let the lady have the dog, go to your local shelter and adopt a new family member for yourself.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/22 21:32:08

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals