Would You Pay for HBO, Showtime or Other Pay Channels a la Carte?
Fef
2012/08/01 18:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
88 votes
|
|
50% | |||
|
31 votes
|
|
18% | |||
|
58 votes
|
|
33% | |||
Cable companies require subscription to their packages before you can subscribe to an individual pay channel such as HBO or Showtime. Would you want to bypass the cable company's package and subscribe to a single pay channel for a monthly fee? Or do you like having other channels offered by the cable companies like Bravo, Real TV, the History Channel, etc?
Alyssa Rosenberg writes for ThinkProgress:
Alyssa Rosenberg writes for ThinkProgress:
The biggest argument people who support the cable business model—or think it’s inevitable and immutable—make is that a lot of channels would go out of business if consumers had to select them individually from a menu rather than getting them as part of a bundle that subsidizes their production.
Read More: http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2012/07/31/612261/...
Top Opinion
-
KaelynnRose 2012/08/01 00:41:56I want a cable package... but I don't want those channels!+5I don't watch much television. I don't watch many movies either. That would require me to log off the internet. You wouldn't want that now would you? LOL






















I would probably get things like Bravo, The History Channel, TLC, the movie channels, etc.
Really, though, I agree with Rosenberg. We'd lose variety. Let's keep it like it is.
so many home shopping network, food channels. that should buy choice.
But yes....the model cable companies use is not one that serves their customers as much as their channel contractors!
In my case, it was cheaper to get the package which included some channels I did not want - - then to buy just the channels I wanted!
Go figure!